The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 25, 2014, 05:32 PM   #1
sig220mwxxxx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2011
Location: Marshall, Texas
Posts: 104
Handloading for the 32 s&w long

I would like to load for the 32 s&w long cartridge. I seem to remember either reading or hearing somewhere that it is best to use softer rather than hard cast bullets when doing so. Can any of you shed any light on this?
sig220mwxxxx is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 06:18 PM   #2
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
The hardness of cast bullets that are used for this cartridge depends more on the velocity and pressure of the rounds than the caliber.
Factory equivalent rounds would be in the 750f/s range, but reloading data shows other bullet/powder combination up to over 1000f/s.
So, it's not a universal truth that all .32s would use the same hardness of bullet.
And there's bullet diameter fit to barrel to consider.
It depends on the load, like any other caliber.
Here's some recommendations:
http://www.reloadammo.com/32swlong.htm
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”
g.willikers is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 06:38 PM   #3
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Unless you're trying to push the bullets to .32 H&R velocities, in an appropriately strong firearm, there's no need for a hard bullet in .32 S&W Long. Harder alloys may actually cause significant leading problems, where softer alloys would not (plus, it's a waste of tin and antimony, since it isn't necessary).

BHN 7-9 is perfectly fine for moderate loads in .32 S&W L, and I can't think of a single application that would require anything over BHN 10.5 (a bit softer than wheel weights).

Softer alloys are more easily deformed to fill the grooves of the barrel and seal the bore; whereas harder alloys may be too hard to be deformed by the pressures encountered in .32 S&W L.

Unfortunately, there aren't many sources for relatively soft .32 caliber bullets. Off the top of my head, the only ones I can think of that are generally readily available are from Hornady and Magtech.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 07:43 AM   #4
Magnum Wheel Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
I have some Lapua soft lead hollow based wad cutters that I used for 32 H&R mag low pressure loads... not sure if those are still available ??? but they worked well...

I see they are still available...

http://www.midwayusa.com/find?sortby...earchscope=all
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust...
Magnum Wheel Man is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 09:03 AM   #5
FlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,723
I use a flush-seated Magnus 98 gr. wadcutter (their #204) over 1.8 gr of W231 for Bullseye competition in my Walther GSP-C Expert. I don't know the hardness of the alloy that Magnus uses, but it's proven to be a dependable and very, very accurate load.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
NRA Certified Instructor: Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, PPIH, Metallic & Shotgun Shell Reloading; RSO
Pemigewasset Valley Fish & Game Club
FlyFish is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 01:17 PM   #6
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Quote:
I have some Lapua soft lead hollow based wad cutters that I used for 32 H&R mag low pressure loads... not sure if those are still available ??? but they worked well...

I see they are still available...
That's right. I forgot about Speer and Lapua.
I think Remington offers them occasionally, as well. But, I wouldn't plan on seeing them any time soon. They have other priorities.

Rim Rock Cast Bullets also offers a few .32 caliber bullets at BHN 12. It's a little harder than I would prefer, but not ridiculous like the BHN 18-22 "hard cast" bullets that almost everyone else pushes.

I know there are a few other semi-custom cast bullet companies out there that offer softer alloys, but, right now, I can't think of their names or whether they offer .32s.

I, personally, use the Hornady 90 gr HBWC when I'm not casting my own (BHN ~10) or using jacketed bullets. .....The Lapua wadcutter is probably a better bullet.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 05:57 PM   #7
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Quote:
I would like to load for the 32 s&w long cartridge. I seem to remember either reading or hearing somewhere that it is best to use softer rather than hard cast bullets when doing so. Can any of you shed any light on this


I am firing commercial cast bullets in my 32 S&W L which the caster claims are 13 BHM. I do not remember leading with these bullets. I went through a case of Aquila 32 S&W L ammunition which had very soft bullets and it leaded something awful. In my experience, very hard cast bullets lead at low pressures, others can explain why, but you don’t need “hard cast” bullets in the 32 S&W L.

For my 32 S&W L, I decided to load at 2.5 grains Bullseye with a 100 grain bullet. Three grains did nothing evil, but was so much faster than factory ammunition, that I decided not to press the issue.


Code:
S&W No. 3 Hand Ejector  3.25" barrel

98 LRN  Aguila Factory					
19-Mar-06 T = 51 °F
							
Ave Vel =	665.9						
Std Dev =	17.52				 		
ES =	69.38				 		
High =	697				 		
Low =	627.6				 		
N =	32	
Horrible leading. 			 		

100 gr LBBFP .313"   2.25 grs Bullseye SS Brass WSP		
19-Mar-06 T = 51 °F	
						
Ave Vel =	693.3					
Std Dev =	20.71			 		
ES =	103.9				 		
High =	721.8				 		
Low =	617.9				 		
N =	32				 		
Elevation good, Windage left,  Mild recoil							
							
100 gr LBBFP .313"   2.5 grs Bullseye SS Brass WSP		
19-Mar-06 T = 51 °F
							
Ave Vel =	768.2					
Std Dev =	16.97			 		
ES =	62.06				 		
High =	807.3			 		
Low =	745.3				 		
N =	17				 		
Elevation good, Windage good, Mild recoil, prefer this to 2.25 grain load							
							
100gr   LBBFP.313" 3.0 grs Bullseye WSP R-P brass	
4-Feb-06 T = 44 °F
						
Ave Vel =	861					
Std Dev =	14.83				 	
ES =	57.83			 	
High =	889.6			 	
Low =	832.1				 	
N =	31	
			 	
no leading, easy extraction, rounded primers,  sharp recoil
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old June 27, 2014, 11:07 PM   #8
JawjaBoy
Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2013
Posts: 56
I have used the 100 gr. RNFP from Missouri Bullet Company which is 12 BHN and they worked very well in my old Arminius snubbie .32 S&W Long and my late uncle's H&R .32 H&R Mag. Leading was minimal in both. Definitely not enough to worry about.
JawjaBoy is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06456 seconds with 8 queries