The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 26, 2011, 08:37 AM   #26
kadima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Posts: 190
Beg to differ, about the K31.
It was never shot in a battle, this is true, but in the true spirit of "Si vis pacem para bellum" it was one or more K31 (or K11) in each Swiss home that allowed the Confoederatio to remain free during IIWW....

K.
kadima is offline  
Old January 26, 2011, 09:00 AM   #27
Tikirocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 909
Quote:
It was never shot in a battle, this is true

Exactly ... in my view it's not a battle rifle or a rifle in the same class as those fielded by the Allied and Axis combatants of WW2; it didn't feature.

Tiki.
__________________
The Lee Enfield forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewforum.php?f=27
Surplus Rifle Forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php
Tikirocker is offline  
Old January 26, 2011, 09:25 AM   #28
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
If you want to shoot them, add an M-1 Carbine, the ammo is reasonable.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old January 26, 2011, 09:37 AM   #29
jsmaye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 616
Quote:
...I don't really class the K31 as a Milsurp ... as it was not used by a combatant nation and never really saw dedicated action - it's a nice target rifle, but not really a legit battle rifle...
A distinction without a difference - it is a milsurp because it is a military surplus.
__________________
No matter how big and tough you are, when a two-year-old hands you a toy phone you'll answer it.
jsmaye is offline  
Old January 26, 2011, 09:55 AM   #30
Tikirocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 909
Quote:
A distinction without a difference - it is a milsurp because it is a military surplus.
Many collectors of WW1 and WW2 Military surplus don't class it as a legitimately tested battle rifle. As a matter of semantics, it can be claimed that it is ex military and therefore a Milsurp. Closer examination of the issue reveals that it didn't serve with the same distinction as the main battle rifles of the Allied and Axis forces of either WW1 and WW2 and that is why the distinction can be, and often is made. So yes it is a Milsurp ... but the term Milsurp for many collectors is synonymous with rifles that saw service with a major combatant.

Tiki.
__________________
The Lee Enfield forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewforum.php?f=27
Surplus Rifle Forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php
Tikirocker is offline  
Old January 26, 2011, 09:58 PM   #31
simonkenton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 891
The best milsurp rifle?

Swedish Mauser, hands down.
simonkenton is offline  
Old January 26, 2011, 10:06 PM   #32
Cheapshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
Quote:
"the greatest battle implement ever devised" by General George S. Patton,
M1 Garand

That being said, and considering the relatively high cost I would say for a beginning collector any of the afore mentioned lower priced rifles are good starters.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING!
Cheapshooter is offline  
Old January 29, 2011, 01:16 AM   #33
Ignition Override
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Location: About 20 nm from the Big Muddy
Posts: 2,887
Milsurplover: If you can shoot well with the old open sights, you can buy a really good/exc. Yugo 24/47 Mauser, or 48 for about $200-250. The surplus ammo should still be about .25/rd., as it was last spring.
A company now advertises that their rear scope mount requires no (perm.) alteration for a short scout scope.

GregM:
I missed your comments earlier about the "Jungle Carbine".

You had 'stolen my thunder', and finally saw where you state that it is also your favorite rifle.
Just in case you are not too far, visits to my brother's outdoor club by Evansville always includes an Enfield #5 and the SKS.

Last edited by Ignition Override; January 29, 2011 at 01:25 AM.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old January 30, 2011, 12:31 AM   #34
Volucris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Posts: 293
For cost vs performance easily the K-31 or a Swedish Mauser in 6.5 Swede.

Garands are wonderful rifles but they are still very expensive from people being too proud of labels.
__________________
"From my cold, dead hands!" - Charlton Heston
Volucris is offline  
Old January 30, 2011, 09:03 PM   #35
Glenn Bartley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Posts: 283
I have a Mossberg M44, in .22LR, that was a military issued trainer and which I bought from the CMP as military surplus. Most people do not think of a rifle in .22LR as milsurp, but if they were military trainers then indeed they are milsurp. As for the M44, it is a great rifle, accurate as a tack driver, and was not that expensive. I do imagine though they have gone up in price more than a little bit since I got mine several years ago.

I also have a couple of Mosin Nagants - one M44 and a 91/30, a Yugoslavian SKS, and a Yugoslavian M24/47 in 8mm Mauser. M24/47 is pretty accurate and a strong rifle. I like it a lot. All are great rifles. I also owned a couple other SKS's and another Nagant M44 but sold them. Those are the milsurp rifles I can speak to through ownership. Of all of them, the Mossberg M44 is by far the best quality rifle and the best shooter.

I would like to pick up a decent Enfield, bought a couple but returned them to the dealer because the crowns were badly scraped, sure would like another in nice shape.

As for the best overall, I have not tried enough of em yet to be able to answer and any answer I could give would be very subjective to personal likes and dislikes.

All the best,
Glenn B
__________________
When I look in the mirror, I am happy to see, some of that nine year old boy, who used to be me.
http://ballseyesboomers.blogspot.com/

Last edited by Glenn Bartley; January 30, 2011 at 09:14 PM.
Glenn Bartley is offline  
Old January 30, 2011, 09:09 PM   #36
.300 Weatherby Mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2008
Posts: 1,777
No love for the Arisakas on the accuracy front?? My type 38 is scary accurate... My remington built Mosin Nagant m91 is really accurate and only the M39 Finn is comparable in the Mosin Family...
.300 Weatherby Mag is offline  
Old February 2, 2011, 10:45 AM   #37
sirsloop
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2011
Posts: 376
1903a3... awesome awesome rifles!!
sirsloop is offline  
Old February 3, 2011, 12:46 PM   #38
finloq
Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2010
Posts: 73
Wow! Favorite (in my collection)?

History:
1895 Chilean M95 Mauser
1939 Soviet (Finnish capture) Tula Mosin 91/30
1917 LSA Enfield No.1 Mk. III

Accuracy:
1945 Long Branch Enfield No.4 Mk.I*
1954 Spanish FR8
1954 Romanian Mosin M44
1954 HRA M1 Garand

Just Plain Neat:
1945 Fazakerly No.5 Mk.I
1907 Soviet (Czech rework) Izhevsk Mosin 91/38
1942 Sako (1898 Sestroryetsk) Mosin M39
1904 Hopkins & Allen 12guage
__________________
"Self-realization. I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, "... I drank what?"
finloq is offline  
Old February 3, 2011, 02:19 PM   #39
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
Quote:
it was one or more K31 (or K11) in each Swiss home that allowed the Confoederatio to remain free during IIWW....
That and being a manufacturing center for the Third Reich.

If we eliminate the K-31 then would we have to do the same thing to the Swedish Mauser?
What counts as enough military use?
The 6mm Lee Navy saw some limited use. Nothing like the Krag and the Krag was limited to a brief war and police actions. The French MAS 49 didn't see much action.
If we go back to the black powder age there are several rifles that only saw colonial action (keeping the natives in their place).

Personally I think the Swedish Mauser should be near the top of any list of quality milsurps. We should base our opinions on the quality of the rifle not that is chanced to be involved in a conflict.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old February 3, 2011, 03:34 PM   #40
Tikirocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 909
Quote:
We should base our opinions on the quality of the rifle not that is chanced to be involved in a conflict.
Nobody has questioned the quality of the K31, on the contrary, what is in question is its legitimacy as a battle proven rifle within some circles of collecting and shooting communities. There is no room for straw men here ... the issue has nothing to do with quality, but rather legacy.


Tiki.
__________________
The Lee Enfield forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewforum.php?f=27
Surplus Rifle Forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php
Tikirocker is offline  
Old February 3, 2011, 05:28 PM   #41
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
Tikkirocker this is from the OP

Quote:
I want to get your opinions of what the best milsurp would be in terms of accuracy, availability, ammo cost and how easy it is to find, and spare parts assuming the rifle is too expensive to just replace if it breaks.
And here's you.

Quote:
the issue has nothing to do with quality, but rather legacy.
Imho the OP intended this thread to be about quality, not legacy, hence my post.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old February 3, 2011, 05:59 PM   #42
Tikirocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 909
Err no ... here's me ...

Quote:
Get em all, one of each ... that's where my collection has gone but my main area of interest is the Enfield rifles. I have out shot scoped modern rifles from the off hand position at 200 yards at my range using my 1942 Lithgow No1 MkIII* using irons ... much to the chagrin of those further down the line. No problems with accuracy and Enfields, I load my own ammo as well.

( I don't really class the K31 as a Milsurp ... as it was not used by a combatant nation and never really saw dedicated action - it's a nice target rifle, but not really a legit battle rifle )

Tiki.

My comments regarding the K31 were an aside, I was making a distinction since the OP may want a rifle that has a proven combat record, both practically and historically speaking. As I said ... no room for straw men here.

I also stated get em all, because many collectors I know have rifles of just about every type - including yours truly. Any rifle can be accurized with care and attention and parts and ammo can be found for all of them as well. The answer to the OP's question is 'how long is a piece of string?'. I gave my two penneth.

If you can't abide differing views you may want to direct your replies to someone else.

Tiki.
__________________
The Lee Enfield forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewforum.php?f=27
Surplus Rifle Forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php

Last edited by Tikirocker; February 3, 2011 at 06:05 PM.
Tikirocker is offline  
Old February 4, 2011, 12:37 AM   #43
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
Quote:
If you can't abide differing views you may want to direct your replies to someone else.
I thrive on disagreement. I am personally a very disagreeable person

You seem to have a similar trait.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old February 4, 2011, 05:07 AM   #44
Tikirocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 909
Quote:
I thrive on disagreement. I am personally a very disagreeable person

You seem to have a similar trait.


Well now, it appears we've found a common trait - perhaps we can be friends after all ...

Tiki.
__________________
The Lee Enfield forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/viewforum.php?f=27
Surplus Rifle Forums - http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php
Tikirocker is offline  
Old February 4, 2011, 10:33 AM   #45
LtMiller
Junior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2011
Posts: 3
The best milsurp rifles

If you have the means, collect them all; if your shooting, consider your ammo expenses, esp. exotic calibers. I started collecting them a few years back, but finally, accepted my mistake; I should have collected M1s and M14s, the real battle rifles, and they are a beauty, and a joy to shoot at the range or in the field, plus 30-06 and 7.62x51 are easy to reload. I started teaching a batch of youths to become riflemen using .22s; they are now ready for the M1A (M14 clone), this Summer. These 2 rifles are my life (my partner) and I will be sharing them to this future riflemen. Part of the lesson will be the M14 receivers, I have in my collection, that was destroyed by our government. It will brings tears to a grown man seeing these so-called paperweights. I am really out of topic, but we need to save these rifles from destruction.
LtMiller is offline  
Old February 7, 2011, 04:22 PM   #46
The Earl o Sammich
Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2011
Posts: 26
No respectable collection would be complete, or even off to a good start for that matter, without an M1 Garand. They can be had relatively cheaply right now through the DCM/CMP. Join a club, shoot a match or 2 and you can buy one through the mail. If you really interested in collecting get you Curios and Relicts FFL. It costs $30 bucks and you can do it through the mail. Forms are down loadable off the internets for free. Now anyone can send you a any weapon that is over 50 years old and has collector value through via common carrier. I've bought Colt 1911 through the mail. The first time you don't have to pay an FFL for a transfer you've made your money back.
The Earl o Sammich is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 10:33 AM   #47
rr2241tx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2007
Location: The Great State of Taxes
Posts: 267
Since you already have 91/30s, Finn M-39. Find out what the M-N really could have been. Check out MG42's aperature sight leaf and front sight set too. Cannot beat 7.62x54R for price and versatility.

But, you need to get your 03 and basically get one or three of all of them. Just keeping up with all the ammo gets to be a hobby of its own.
__________________
rr2241tx
rr2241tx is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 02:51 PM   #48
bassfishindoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2010
Posts: 166
This is a completely personal decision. I have a few milsurps. My favorites are the US Army milsurp rifle as I love the history that goes along with them. I currently have a M1 Garand and US Remington 1903A3. I still need a Krag, 1903, 1917, and M1 Carbine. When that is accomplished I will try to get one of each of the different manufacturers. Also, if I ever get the money, I would love one of the few M14s that managed to make it to civilian hands!
__________________
2LT United States Army
NRA Life Member
GOA Life Member
East Tennessee State University Quillen College of Medicine
bassfishindoc is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 05:23 PM   #49
hikingman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 301
Best value for the dollar? A walnut K31 with above average stock and VG+ barrel (inside), matching numbers across the rifle-including the bolt!
A soldier's tag would make a nice bonus...
__________________
NRA Life Member
hikingman is offline  
Old February 14, 2011, 07:06 PM   #50
Bamashooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2010
Posts: 1,860
1903 Springfield
Mosin Nagant 91/59
Hungarian M-44
Thats what I have. I would one day like to add a FN Mauser and an M1 Garand
Bamashooter is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10626 seconds with 8 queries