The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 21, 2009, 02:02 PM   #1
musicman
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2006
Posts: 25
Reason for new nipples

I've noticed a number of posts that talked of buying Tresco nipples, and wondered if there is anything better about aftermarkets like these? Thanks for the education, John
musicman is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 02:54 PM   #2
FrontierGander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
are these the brass looking nipples? If so, the one i bought lasted maybe 60 to 75 shots. I had to replace it as 4 of the 5 threads on the nipple Broke off

get yourself a good stainless steel nipple.
FrontierGander is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 02:55 PM   #3
Indian Outlaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2008
Location: Behind a computer
Posts: 100
They are called "Treso," I believe. I haven't used them, but many people love them.
Indian Outlaw is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 03:24 PM   #4
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
All the revolvers that I shoot have Treso nipples on them. They are an Ampco bronze material that are more uniform is shape and have a smaller flash hole than stock nipples. The smaller flash hole reduces blowback when the charge is ignited, and the uniform shape optimizes the cap/nipple combination used. I've got hundreds of rounds fired through my revolvers with Treso nipples and the only ones that had to replaced were mushroomed cause the hammer was hitting them. Once I dressed the hammer properly, the problem went away.

How did your nipple(s) only last 60-75 shots frontiergander?

Now, if you're talkin a single shot rifle or pistol, YMMV.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 04:10 PM   #5
FrontierGander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
the threads on the nipple basically just broke right off. This was on my cva mountain stalker. I checked out the drum threads and the are all clean. This nipple failed,

FrontierGander is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 06:55 PM   #6
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
Defective nipple??? It happens. You should get hundreds, if not thousands of shots through it before it fails. Send it back for a replacement & see what the supplier says.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce

Last edited by Fingers McGee; April 21, 2009 at 11:36 PM.
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 11:16 PM   #7
FrontierGander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
i threw it out. I am using the stainless steel, knight 'hotshot?" nipple and the spitsfire nipple on my 2 sidelocks now.
FrontierGander is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 11:28 PM   #8
joelberg
Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Posts: 41
Where do you buy these nipples at? I've just got stock and they seem to be working quite decently, but I'd be interested in "upgrading"
joelberg is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 11:35 PM   #9
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
http://www.possibleshop.com/s-s-nipples-cb.html
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 06:47 AM   #10
CaptainCrossman
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2009
Posts: 381
I put new stainless nipples on my 1858 Remington Navy Arms repro, about 15 years ago. The originals were soft and mushroomed, and the caps wouldn't go on anymore. Since then I've had zero problems with caps/nipples- also the caps stay on the nipples better, they are slightly larger in size.

Other than being soft/mushrooming out, the other reason to change nipples is a more correct size, so they hold the cap without falling off- and also for a smaller charge hole inside, so the blast of firing the gun, doesn't blow the hammer back. Last time I shot my Colt 1851, it was blowing the hammer back to badly, it cycled the cylinder to the next chamber, and the hammer was resting half way on the next chamber's cap.

Years ago, while shooting a short-barrel 1851 Navy "Sheriffs" model, I experienced hammer blowback so severe, it cycled the gun to next chamber and fired it again automatically, like a semi-automatic.

I pulled the trigger once, it went "boom-boom" and 2 shots were fired.

This is a perfect example of improper half-aszed engineering, or lack of engineering, by the foreign mfrs. The guns should have stainless nipples from the factory, with the proper charge hole size to prevent blowback, and there should be no cap jams- not in guns costing $300-$400.

the American shooter/consumer has let these overseas mfrs. get away with murder, and when word finally gets around just how bad the quality of these guns is, their sales are going to suffer. They need to wise up, and fix some things. They've been shipping a lot of junk guns, for a long time.

BTW the stainless nipples I put on the 1858, were sold by a company called "Uncle Mikes"- but I don't know if they still carry them- they were a SUPERIOR product, way better than the Italian installed nipples

http://www.gunaccessories.com/UncleMikes/holsters.asp
CaptainCrossman is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 07:00 AM   #11
Indian Outlaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2008
Location: Behind a computer
Posts: 100
the American shooter/consumer has let these overseas mfrs. get away with murder, and when word finally gets around just how bad the quality of these guns is, their sales are going to suffer. They need to wise up, and fix some things. They've been shipping a lot of junk guns, for a long time.

I am pretty impressed with my Cimarron/Uberti forged frame Remington. The lines are sharp, the timing is good, the cylinder gap is fine, and the screws are hard (believe it or not). Also the new grip shape is an improvement over that of the older cast frame Remingtons. Sure, the cylinder steel is soft, and so I loosened the bolt/trigger spring screw a third of a turn to lessen the force of the bolt striking the cylinder (a trick I learned from the "Old Coots" on the Voy BP forum). I'll probably thin the spring a bit for a more permanent solution. All in all, though, this is the best Italian cap & ball Remington I've handled, and that includes the fine Lymans from the 70's. Perhaps Beretta has lit a fire under Uberti's derriere.
Indian Outlaw is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 07:00 AM   #12
azsixshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Location: Pinckney, MI
Posts: 657
Quote:
Reason for new nipples
Because you are sick of your current girlfriend?
__________________
"Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We're evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that." --Saul Tigh
http://sargesrollcall.blogspot.com/2...s-no-more.html
azsixshooter is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 06:03 PM   #13
AdmiralB
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 88
I'll probably buy replacement nipples at some point, but not for performance reasons...it'll be because the nipples on my guns - all Ubertis, all made in 2007 or 2008 - have nipples that are at least three different sizes.

Each gun (or replacement cylinder) has nipples of uniform size, but the sets vary quite a bit. Some hold Remington #10s fine, most are so small that the caps have to be pinched substantially.
AdmiralB is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 06:16 PM   #14
musicman
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2006
Posts: 25
Many thanks to all. A good way to get an education. John

By the way, you should have seen the look I got when I told my wife I had to have a nipple wrench. It really went down hill when I said the one I got was too big and I had to have a smaller one!
musicman is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 06:25 PM   #15
FrontierGander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
just tell her... I said nipple WRENCH not nipple WENCH.
FrontierGander is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 06:52 PM   #16
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
What a set-up!

"Yuck, it's Peter's!! Now bring Stewie a better nipple & wench!"






Last edited by arcticap; April 22, 2009 at 07:30 PM.
arcticap is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08566 seconds with 8 queries