September 30, 2010, 09:26 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
|
California shot ?
Just wondering what the rules are for lead shot on trap & skeet ranges in CA. I know it's steel only for hunting.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain |
September 30, 2010, 10:11 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2008
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,281
|
The only reason you have to use steel is for water foul, and thats so you don't poison yourself. Ducks eat whats at the bottom and lead sinks. The duck eats the lead, you eat the duck and, well, you get the idea.
Yes, lead is perfectly acceptable. If you can't use it, its the range's rules and no one else's.
__________________
There is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people. |
October 1, 2010, 01:13 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
|
I beg to differ, the rifleer isn't quite up to dateā¦
It should be noted, California has a large lead free hunting area to protect condors. For now, lead it's still legal for upland game within the non-lead zone. For more info see: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/hunting/condor/ San Francisco's Pacific Rod and Gun Club requires non-toxic shot. I stopped by there several years ago, and non-members are required to purchase their shells at the Field House. |
October 1, 2010, 07:04 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
|
re:the rifler
Quote:
Years ago, a friend of mine was duck huntig at a refuge. A warden was coming around to check everyones ammo to make sure it was all nontoxic. Anyway, when it was his turn he stood up. He was at the waters edge and as he stood, several rounds that were in his vest pocket fell out, landed in the water, and sank. It was a total accident. The LEO fined him for having lead shot in his possession. The Warden assumed the shells that fell in the water were lead shot, he was trying to get rid of them by throwing them in the water. MY friend got a lawyer to fight this. I haven't spoken to this guy in a few years. So, I don't know the outcome of his case. But the point is, this is one area of hunting laws you don't want to muck around with. |
|
October 1, 2010, 09:09 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,607
|
It depends. Some ranges allow lead, but most require steel. Ask beforehand.
|
October 1, 2010, 06:20 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2008
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,281
|
Thanks for the correction. I recently took a hunter safety class and thats what was explained to me. I was just repeating what my instructor said, but everyone makes mistakes.
__________________
There is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people. |
October 1, 2010, 11:18 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
|
re:therifler
Quote:
|
|
October 1, 2010, 11:32 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
|
the rifleer,
Glad to help. If your hunter safety class was like most, the instructor had a boat load of info to teach and a limited amount of time. Not long ago, there was a thread from a safety instructor, IIRC, he wasn't a shotgun guy. He wanted to know what the likelihood of one of his students encountering an old gun with a Damascus barrel -- he was trying to decide how much time to spend on the typical Damascus barrel warning. From you post, it's obvious, your instructor spent the time to explain the reasoning behind the migratory water fowl protection laws; but, at the expense of making you aware of other California specific non-toxic requirements. |
|
|