May 1, 2019, 08:24 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,295
|
Quote:
|
|
May 1, 2019, 08:38 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,293
|
In my life I have never seen a “life or death” situation but I have seen two negligent discharges. Fortunately both were in to the dirt.
As for “who advocates the Israeli/Mossad draw”... oddly enough it’s the Israeli police forces and the Mossad. O.0 |
May 1, 2019, 08:45 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
|
Quote:
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness |
|
May 1, 2019, 09:09 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,293
|
I am not a professional. I suspect many commenting are also not.
What you suspect could be changed to what you know by reading about it. |
May 1, 2019, 09:19 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Quote:
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
May 1, 2019, 09:26 PM | #31 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
|
Quote:
You don't have to be a professional to understand the reasons behind people that choose not to carry Condition 3. If you want to personally carry Condition 3, it's really of little concern to me. When you start calling people that point out the potential drawbacks of Condition 3 "mall commandos" then yeah I'm going to make a comment because there are plenty of people that are certainly not "mall commandos" that have explained the drawbacks. There's no getting around the fact that carrying concealed versus carrying in a military capacity is different in terms of the likely threats faced (of course that depends on the role for either person). There are ways to interpret that difference. One way is to say that the likelihood of needing that firearm is much smaller so it makes sense to not have as ready access to the firearm in exchange for a reduced risk of a discharge. Another way is to say that unlike a soldier where that are at times front-lines and rear controlled areas, as a concealed carrier knowing when and where you will be in danger is not always a given. You may not have the advanced warning to put your pistol into a ready to fire state and you also have the added complexity of drawing from concealment versus drawing from a readily accessible holster. You also likely don't have a primary weapon such as a rifle, shotgun, etc. That might make you conclude that you need even more ready access to the firearm. Quote:
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness Last edited by TunnelRat; May 1, 2019 at 09:48 PM. |
||
May 1, 2019, 09:43 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2016
Location: Rural PA
Posts: 1,639
|
Quote:
__________________
22lr, 20 gauge, 8mm Mauser, 35 Remington, 30-06, 5.56x45/223, 9mm, 380acp |
|
May 1, 2019, 09:59 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
|
Quote:
If someone wants a safety on their pistol I don't consider him or her an idiot. Lots of people do differently than myself. I don't consider them all idiots. What they do doesn't really matter to me frankly. Rifles have safeties, shotguns have safeties. Somehow with training people remember to disengage them. While those firearms often don't have the internal drop safeties of modern pistols and are more readily accessible if being carried, people survived for a long time using safeties on pistols. Not every one of them died, not every one of them was an idiot. The same applies to striker fired pistols without safeties. Pick a system and train with it. When I shot DA/SA predominantly, decocking became second nature and I trained so that the first DA shot wasn't problematic. Heck I remember training at SIG when all the instructors had were P-series hammer fired pistols as the P320 hadn't been released yet. Somehow the instructors and the rest of us survived. Last edited by TunnelRat; May 1, 2019 at 10:04 PM. |
|
May 1, 2019, 11:57 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,312
|
AD's
Glock AD seem to come in different flavors. The takedown procedure has led to a couple. In our area, a trooper shot a tort lawyer in the butt (justice?) while demonstrating the takedown of his issue Glock in a shop. The obstructed trigger/holster is another, be it holstering, or a loaded, loose pistol in temp storage. Dorking with the factory trigger with an aftermarket wonder trigger led to another in my area.
DA/SA pistols are done. While a DA/SA was new idea in 1940, the striker fired pistol has now arrived and is not going away. I'll add that I have seen quite a few people who knew better, trained people, fail to decock under stress then reholster or relocate/navigate a barricade or location, resulting in an AD. The decock lever, springs, struts, slots they run in, all add parts and complexity and openings for grit as well. Note that the military's new striker fired pistol the M17/M18, will have an external safety. |
May 2, 2019, 06:57 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
Did you know that most ND's happen with unloaded guns? Do you have any idea why that is called Israeli carry? It has nothing to do with high speed low drag commandos...... At the end of WWII when the UN set up Israel they were surrounded by enemies, similar to today...... They were desperate for arms, they got all kinds in all kinds of conditions. some unsafe to carry loaded. So, instead of trying to train all people all the different types of guns they opted to just have them carry with an empty chamber. When I carry a 1911 or similar gun I carry it cocked and locked, or condition 1, wherever I am. When I carry a Glock its loaded and chambered, when I carry a revolver the cylinder is loaded, I don't own one that is unsafe to do so. Condition 3 is for neophytes and others who cannot safely carry their pistol the correct way. Never been a Ninja but I was in the Army for a spell and a cop for over 30 years, not to mention a lifelong competitive shooter and hunter.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
May 2, 2019, 07:17 AM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
Quote:
|
|
May 2, 2019, 07:39 AM | #37 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 1,475
|
Quote:
Glock leg, what a giggle..Lotsa gun owners(millions??), other militarys, scads of law enforcement have figured out this and other 'striker' models..the military can too. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Raven Vanguard
__________________
PhormerPhantomPhlyer "Tools not Trophies” Last edited by USNRet93; May 2, 2019 at 07:56 AM. |
||||
May 2, 2019, 08:42 AM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
Quote:
|
|
May 2, 2019, 08:47 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,293
|
Much respect for those here with military or police service; and that is what I was attempting to express- I am not claiming what is right for professionals, I am not claiming what is “right” for anyone.
I am suggesting that for those without sufficient training and are carrying “administratively”, Condition 3 is safer. None in the chamber. As we have discussed, the chances I will be attacked by a cougar are infinitesimally small so I take it as a light hearted joke when people mention cougar attacks. Or bear attacks in the lower 48. Carrying a pistol while carrying a shotgun seems silly to me, unless it’s deer season or they don’t like picking pellets out of squirrels. Seems to me it’s faster and more powerful to close the action Of the shotgun. I was just reading that the qualification standards for Israeli military and police for pistol is 1.2 seconds... holster to fire. Condition 3. Standard issues may be the usual Glocks, Jericho, or FN. You fellas do what you feel safe with, but this is a thread about Bubba shooting himself in the leg. It seems more people shoot themselves negligently than are attacked by cougars and bears combined. |
May 2, 2019, 08:59 AM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1, 2001
Posts: 10,223
|
The most dangerous gun in your hands, is one youre not familar with, and didnt take the time to bother to learn.
There are only a couple of basic handgun action types, so its not unreasonable or undoable, to have one of each, and practice regularly with them. I think youre going to find if you spend some time with each of them, to actually learn to shoot and handle them properly, most all of the negative impressions you might have had, just melt away. Its like anything else, self-induced ignorance really just hurts you. Glocks are no more unsafe than anything else. The only way they would be, is if you are unsafe with them. Same as anything else. |
May 2, 2019, 09:06 AM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2015
Location: coastal NC
Posts: 645
|
Quote:
|
|
May 2, 2019, 09:09 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
Quote:
|
|
May 2, 2019, 09:29 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
|
|
May 2, 2019, 09:49 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
There is nothing new in this thread. Why should it continue?
Closed.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
|