The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 16, 2017, 11:01 AM   #1
nanney1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 24, 2017
Posts: 239
.44 magnum SD?

OK, I've read that the .357 magnum can be painful to shoot and that if you ever had to shoot indoors without ear protection, you can risk permanent hearing damage. And if shot outdoors, temporary hearing damage.

So, wouldn't the same thing hold true for a .44 magnum whether it was for SD or large predator defense? I don't know. Also, where does .44 special fit in this question about loudness?
nanney1 is offline  
Old December 16, 2017, 11:09 AM   #2
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,341
Shooting most any SD/HD handgun indoors will give a degree of permanent hearing damage. Bigger the boom, bigger the degree of damage. .44 special makes the same size hole in a human and will do a similar amount of wound damage with substantially less noise and recoil. Shoot more than a few rounds of .357 outdoors without ear protection and the damage will not be temporary.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old December 16, 2017, 11:53 AM   #3
Doc Holliday 1950
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2014
Location: Bout as south as it gets
Posts: 1,238
Yes I agree. When I was on the Force, I shot my 4" Python without ear protection
& that was in 1970-73. My ear function suffered & I'm wearing hearing aids now.
Be young/old & stupid or be smart but if you ever have to use your 44 or 357 or whatever for protection the initial noise might scare the begees out of you & throw you off. You have to be prepared.
__________________
Shoot well and be Accurate,

Doc
Doc Holliday 1950 is offline  
Old December 16, 2017, 12:55 PM   #4
Andy Blozinski
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2013
Posts: 525
If suppressed weapons were not specified as illegal for concealed carry in Texas, I'd pack an automatic instead of my .357.
I pack a Rhino. It's not physically painful to shoot. It is loud. If I ever have to use it to save my life (or another's), I'm not thinking about my hearing. It would be nice to have the luxury of hearing afterwards if I could use a suppressed weapon.
Andy Blozinski is offline  
Old December 16, 2017, 01:54 PM   #5
Danoobie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 27, 2017
Posts: 351
Anything shot indoors will be loud.
The .357 is a little snappy, but well within the average
person's ability, IMO.
The .44 Mag is louder, with heavier recoil, perhaps a little
out of the average person's range of comfort or liking.

Hearing damage is much more likely with repeated or
constant noise sources.

OTOH, I would not fire a gun indoors, without good hearing
protection, ever, unless forced to defend oneself.
Danoobie is offline  
Old December 16, 2017, 04:41 PM   #6
Brian48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Boston, People's Republic of MA
Posts: 1,615
My Model 29 is not used for SD, but I do kept 200gr Gold Dot .44Spls loaded in it just in case I have to grab it for HD.
__________________
Proud to have served.
Brian48 is offline  
Old December 16, 2017, 05:04 PM   #7
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
The .44 was designed as a HUNTING cartridge. It was NEVER designed for personal defense usage against humans.

There are numerous reasons for this. Even Detective Harry "Dirty" Callahan of the San Fransisco PD, carried .44 Specials in his .44 Magnum S&W Model 29.
Model12Win is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 08:46 AM   #8
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
(This from a deaf person that has to wear hearing aids.)

Firing any center fire round without hearing protection will cause damage to your hearing. Depending on more factors than I care to get into here it can be anywhere from not very noticeable. Up to permanent damage, along with ruptured ear drums. Auditory exclusion may make one not notice it right then. The thing is there is still going to be some amount of damage.

Do not be an idiot that wants to see what it is like by firing one off outside without protection. It is not worth the damage to your hearing. I also advise to if you go to public ranges be a hero by buying a cheap bottle of ear plugs to put into your range bag. If you see someone that has no hearing protection. Offer them some ear plugs.

A .44 Magnum load inside would be a bad idea. Even a Special load will cause damage.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 09:04 AM   #9
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
I've been present when both a 45 ACP and 357 mag were fired indoors with no hearing protection. While I don't recommend it, neither were any louder than a 9mm or any other commonly used SD gun. If a 357 or 44 mag were what I had I'd not hesitate to use them out of fear of hearing loss. Neither would be my 1st choice either, but if you really have to use a gun for SD hearing loss is way down on the list of concerns.

That said I know of 2 LE officers who had to retire early after discharging 357 mag revolvers in enclosed areas. They suffered enough hearing loss that they could no longer pass physicals. Both of these involved cases where they were involved in a physical struggle and the gun was fired in an unorthodox position nearer their heads than normal.

Given the choice between a full power 357 load, especially from a sub 4" barrel, and a mid range 44 load I'd take the 44 load every time. I find a 240 gr load at around 1000-1100 fps to be much more pleasant to shoot and believe it to be at least as effective as a 357 mag load. You can always load up to full potential for outdoors use and hunting.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 09:14 AM   #10
CajunBass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: North Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 4,766
HUH? WHAT? Did someone say something?

Besides the constant ringing in my ears, I'm constantly having to turn up the TV to hear dialog. Music and explosions come through just fine, but what did that guy say to the medic? Forget it.

Anything fired inside is going to damage your hearing, even if as people like to say, you won't hear it in a self-defense situation. The fact that you "don't hear it" simply means that your mind blocks it out as it narrows down to focus on what is immediately important. The noise is still there, you just don't perceive it.

And finally to answer your question directly, I've never fired any of them inside without protection, but a 357 and a 44 Magnum are both LOUD even with ear muffs. I can't imagine them unprotected. The 38/44 special might not have that ear splitting CRACK the magnums do, but they're still LOUD.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16 (NKJV)
CajunBass is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 10:00 AM   #11
UncleEd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2013
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,150
In "Friends of Eddie Coyle" both book and
movie I believe the last line after a .38 Special
is fired inside a car, "Boy, that was loud!"
UncleEd is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 11:07 AM   #12
tallball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2014
Posts: 2,444
I would go for 44 special.

I had to fire a round of 357 once, outdoors, in a SD situation.

That is probably one of the reasons my hearing is so poor now.
tallball is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 12:25 PM   #13
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...shoot indoors without ear protection..." Is really as stupid as stupid gets. Even a .22 will cause permanent hearing damage. There's no such thing as 'temporary hearing damage. And a suppressor will not matter.
This is from another forum. No idea where the data came from.
https://www.m1911.org/loudness.htm
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 12:28 PM   #14
bungiex88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 14, 2015
Location: central pa
Posts: 264
My 357 is more higher pitched then my 44. I've shot outside without hearing protection with both and if I'm shooting the 357 it's always hearing protection it makes my ears ring for a couple days. Seems like the 44 is more of a deeper bass sound
__________________
Life is to short to give a darn
bungiex88 is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 02:19 PM   #15
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
Bill Jordan wrote that the 44 Magnum had too much kick for a fast follow up shot and while he doubted "anyone clobbered with this cannon" would need a second shot you might be facing multiple assailants. Facing a predator ? Don''t hunt myself, AFAIK hunters do not wear ear protection. IMHO in a SD situation the risk to hearing is like fighting without eyeglasses-you have to weight the pros and cons. IIRC it is prolonged to exposure to loud noise that is harmful.
SIGSHR is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 02:27 PM   #16
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,746
Quote:
In "Friends of Eddie Coyle" both book and
movie I believe the last line after a .38 Special
is fired inside a car, "Boy, that was loud!"
From Wiki:

Quote:
Dillon gives instructions to the young hood on how to drive out of the city to Quincy. As Dillon explains the machinations of the hit and the young hood's payoff, the drunk Eddie sleeps in the front passenger seat; using a .22 caliber revolver, Dillon shoots Coyle inside the moving car.
I thought I remembered it being a .22. When first got my model 19 and a box of Remington 357 loads I fired the first shot out of the window of my truck while way out in the country. OMG!!! That was LOUD!!! And it hurt. My HD gun is a model 15 loaded with Remington 38 caliber 158gr lead hollow points. It would be loud but doable.
ThomasT is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 03:00 PM   #17
UncleEd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2013
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,150
Ratshooter,

Thanks for the correction on "Coyle."
Perhaps it was just the movie or
more likely a bad memory all around
on my part.
UncleEd is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 03:29 PM   #18
Dufus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
I have been hearing impaired since 1969 along with tone deaf. I can't hear certain frequencies.

I have testified before that I was sitting next to an uncle in a small room when he inadvertently fired a factory round from a 4" S&W 357 Mag.

I was instantly totally deaf for a good 15 minutes. I could not hear a damn thing, even screaming.

As has been noted numerous times before this post, anything short of a pellet gun fired indoors will be detrimental to your health.

Even a 22LR in a handgun is very loud. They are loud outdoors as well.

I have to wear hearing protecting around ANY loud noise.
Dufus is offline  
Old December 17, 2017, 04:14 PM   #19
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSHR View Post
Don''t hunt myself, AFAIK hunters do not wear ear protection.
Those of us that regularly hunt with big bore handcannons do wear hearing protection. Stupid not to.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old December 18, 2017, 12:05 PM   #20
Salmoneye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
One of the reasons I sold my Contender (though I have regretted it ever since)...

Fair chase black bear in VT in 1990...Fired a round from my 10" 'Hunter' barrel in .45-70 without protection...All I 'heard' was a very loud "TING!!!"

Ears have never been the same...
Salmoneye is offline  
Old December 18, 2017, 01:25 PM   #21
black mamba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
Back on topic: if you handload, a 44 magnum DA revolver is very good SD medicine. A 180-200 gr hollow point at 1100 fps nearly duplicates the 45 ACP +P and is controllable in rapid double action shooting, while being a lot more accurate than most semi-autos.
black mamba is offline  
Old December 18, 2017, 08:41 PM   #22
JDinAZ
Member
 
Join Date: August 4, 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 23
My 44 mag turns heads in the desert. They have ear protection on also. Apparently it sounds like a cannon or something. But I carry it every day full of 240g white box and love it

__________________
R/S
J.D.
https://www.originalprecision.com/
JDinAZ is offline  
Old December 19, 2017, 11:46 AM   #23
Real Gun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 2,743
Quote:
The .44 was designed as a HUNTING cartridge. It was NEVER designed for personal defense usage against humans.

There are numerous reasons for this. Even Detective Harry "Dirty" Callahan of the San Fransisco PD, carried .44 Specials in his .44 Magnum S&W Model 29.
Not to pick bones here, but I read this and thought there are many popular guns that were never "meant for" everyday carry, especially concealed, until there was interest in shortening the barrels below 4" or any legal hunting or Canadian minimum length. There are also a number of cartridges that are in common usage that originated for some other purpose, especially military or law enforcement, where the sales numbers were there to justify and fund development. There are other guns and cartridges that seem to fit the niche of simply "build it, and they will come", gun nuts on both ends of the proposition, guys who like to blow stuff up.
__________________
Not an expert, just a reporter.
Real Gun is offline  
Old December 19, 2017, 07:23 PM   #24
otasan
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 519
I use my 6-inch S&W 629 for home defense here in VT. I use a cast 215 grain wadcutter at 1250 FPS.
otasan is offline  
Old December 20, 2017, 01:28 PM   #25
disseminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
Due to the likelihood of discharging your self defense firearm indoors, I always recommend and practice carrying only subsonic loads in whatever caliber I am carrying.

9mm: 147 HST
40SW: 180 HST
45ACP: 230 HST

In a 44 I would probably look at a 240 at about 1000 fps.

While not indoors, I have taken advanced close quarters training and learned first hand that my 357 SIG and 10mm were not good choices for self defense for me.

Subsonic loads are still loud in a closed area but the lack of a sonic boom and less muzzle blast makes a real difference.

YMMV.
disseminator is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09177 seconds with 10 queries