April 26, 2012, 08:57 AM | #2126 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
According to the Daily CallerU. S. Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich (of "ATF makes every effort to interdict weapons that have been purchased illegally and prevent their transportation to Mexico" fame) has resigned from his position with DOJ - making him the first D.C. DOJ employee (but not the last) to fall on his sword.
|
April 26, 2012, 10:45 AM | #2127 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
This is kind of strange because it doesn't seem to me that F&F is recieving that much attention. I know that can be a function of the media, but it's almost as if the F&F investigation is in hiatus.
Weich, Holder or the administration must see something coming down the pike for this to happen. |
April 26, 2012, 01:56 PM | #2128 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
Quote:
After the elections, it will either be a case of the re-elected administration throwing a few sacrifical lambs to us, and burying the issue completely, or a new administration trying to see those responsible actually face justice. And, in the case of a new administration, there will be a strong push to just let it go, as they have more important, more pressing, more current things to do, and fix. Myself, I think this is something that should be brought up (and forcefully) everytime any politicain mentions anything about our borders. With the election looming, this is the worst time to let them hide it under the rug. Of course, that's just me....
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
April 26, 2012, 03:30 PM | #2129 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Another option that Ronald Weich is running out of cannon fodder (not so USAG Holder though). There are only so many people between him and Phoenix that he can throw under the bus and most of them are gone now.
Add to that he is a political appointee and will lose his job with little warning should President Obama not be re-elected in November. If he stays, he faces several opportunities to perjure himself before Congress, only this time there will be fewer people he can blame for these unfortunate misunderstandings, since most of those people have already been blamed for the previous "miscommunications." I could see where a nice, cushy job as dean of a law school would seem attractive to him given the potential future scenarios of keeping his current job. On the other hand, Lanny Breuer is obviously either a liar or so grossly incompetent in judgment he couldn't get work as a line cook in McDonald's; but AG Holder doesn't seem to be interested in seeing him go just yet. I guess Holder is worried about his own line of cannon fodder getting thinned out too soon. |
April 26, 2012, 07:28 PM | #2130 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
re 44amp in post 2128, that's likely how the thing will go, which strikes me as all wrong.
Of course, nobody in power asked my opinion, and besides, given that I still believe 2+2=4, what do I know? Oh by the way, I don't even come close to getting a meaningful response from any of my "elected things", canned emails and boiler plate "letters" not being meaningful responses. Just like the financial aspects of The Great Recession, none of those truly responsible will ever be inconvenienced, let along punished for manifold wrongdoings. Last edited by Tom Servo; April 26, 2012 at 09:26 PM. Reason: Removed electoral politics |
April 26, 2012, 07:42 PM | #2131 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 29, 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 465
|
Quote:
__________________
Send lawyers, guns, and money... Armorer-at-Law.com 07FFL/02SOT |
|
April 26, 2012, 09:27 PM | #2132 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
I've got a sneaky suspicion that this matter will be politicized during the months leading up to November.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
April 27, 2012, 08:04 AM | #2133 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
|
|
April 27, 2012, 08:33 AM | #2134 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Holders not worried because he is aware the likelihood of something sticking to him is very remote. Holder is not concerned that a few congressman are making an on again, off again, half hearted attempt at getting to the bottom of F&F.
The professional bureaucrats in the BATFE guide the organization and give it direction. It is significant that Operation F&F originated with the professional bureaucrats in the BATFE, not the political appointees. The concept of F&F was sold up the food chain by those same professional bureaucrats. Despite bombastic sporadic rhetoric to the contrary, the US congress is not interested in reining in the BATFE. Last edited by thallub; April 27, 2012 at 08:40 AM. |
April 27, 2012, 11:30 AM | #2135 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
Was Bill Newell a political appointee?
The idea could have been hatched by anybody, but I believe the first we see of it is in documents originated from Burke... I could be wrong. I thought it might have between Dennis Burke and Bill Newell. Although we really don't know right? Dennis Burke was (is) so rabidly anti-gun I wouldn't doubt he was the mastermind. I think at the very least though there were a lot of people in the BATFE who were willing to pimp ATF out to the administration to score political points. |
April 27, 2012, 12:03 PM | #2136 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
Quote:
In the late 1970s i was a M/Sgt. in US Army EOD. Had a lot of professional dealings with the BATF. Been reluctant to tell this story to anyone for 33 years. The SAC of a BATF regional office tried to coerce me into lying to a federal judge. Acting on information provided by a snitch felon, the BATF raided the home of an outstanding citizen and took his gun collection of over 200 pieces. They also confiscated hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition. This is where i came in. To shorten the story, the BATFE claimed they turned all that ammo over to my EOD unit for destruction. That was a lie. After i refused to write a statement saying we had destroyed that ammo, the SAC showed up at my office with a CID officer i had known for many years. The SAC asked the CID officer to read me my rights. The CID man retorted: "You sob if you want the M/Sgt. informed of his rights, you do it". There was an internal BATF investigation; i was questioned by the BATF investigator. He readily admitted that a federal judge had ordered the BATF to return the guns and ammo to their owner. Some of the guns and all of the ammo was missing. i retired from the Army shortly after, moved out of the state and don't know what happened after that. if i'm on this site complaining about my instant check going tilt you will know why. Last edited by thallub; April 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM. |
||
April 27, 2012, 09:48 PM | #2137 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Posts: 550
|
Sharyl Attkisson, at CBS, reports that:"Republicans prepare contempt citation against Eric Holder over Fast and Furious". Lets hope it succeeds!
Link to CBS article: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...t-and-furious/
__________________
In my hour of darkness In my time of need Oh Lord grant me vision Oh Lord grant me speed - Gram Parsons |
April 28, 2012, 07:25 AM | #2138 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Based on the article I read, in this instance "prepare" means something like "We're getting ready to start getting ready to get ready to start thinking about whether or not we should start thinking about maybe doing something."
In other words ... don't expect to read tomorrow's headlines and see that Holder has been served. |
April 28, 2012, 07:44 AM | #2139 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
I understand from the article though the political risks involved in leveling a contempt charge.
It's almost as if the case for the contempt charge has to be tried in the court of public opinion and the accusers must prevail or face political backlash. It takes time to build support for something like that, to plan, to organize, to coordinate. From the article, it sounds like the next step after the contempt charge would be getting a federal judge to order DOJ to turn over all remaining requested documents. Could a judge also order them to turn over unredacted documents? |
April 29, 2012, 09:44 AM | #2140 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Jimmy Kimmell managed to work in a Fast and Furious reference at the White House correspondents' dinner by telling the President to "Stick by his guns... and if you don't have any, ask Eric Holder."
http://twitchy.com/2012/04/29/jimmy-...scratch-heads/ |
May 3, 2012, 11:30 AM | #2141 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Actual text is here [pdf]. Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe Last edited by Tom Servo; May 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM. |
||
May 3, 2012, 01:10 PM | #2142 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
It looks like they are gathering the votes and support needed to go ahead with the contempt citation. Considering that DOJ has still not provided ANY documents in 12 out of the 22 categories listed in the memo, I'd be surprised if DOJ starts cooperating now.
It looks to me like they are going to claim they have cooperated enough and decline to turn over any further documents and then claim the whole thing is political. |
May 3, 2012, 01:56 PM | #2143 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2009
Location: Frozen Tundra
Posts: 2,414
|
Certainly the DOJ is not superior to the House or the Senate as a institution.. The lack of subordination to the will of the people as expressed in the institution of the House and Senate is a stunning statement of how much power the DOJ feels it has.
__________________
Molon Labe |
May 3, 2012, 02:07 PM | #2144 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
It's not so much a sense of power; they think Holder is untouchable.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
May 3, 2012, 02:31 PM | #2145 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
So who would prosecute/support the contempt citation? I thought it was DOJ that performed this function. Would any of you expect the head of DOJ to enforce a citation against the head of the DOJ?
Where am I going wrong here?
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
May 3, 2012, 02:57 PM | #2146 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,747
|
According to what I think I just read, the Speaker would appoint a U.S. Attorney to handle it.
Perhaps this link will help: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2007/7/8/1731/15806 (talkleft.com)
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor “Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life......” President John F. Kennedy |
May 3, 2012, 03:54 PM | #2147 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
2 USC § 194 - Certification of failure to testify or produce; grand jury action |
|
May 3, 2012, 04:26 PM | #2148 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2000
Location: SLC,Utah
Posts: 2,704
|
Only problem being that the U.S. Attorneys work for the DOJ and, at the very least, present the appearance of a conflict of interest.
|
May 3, 2012, 10:46 PM | #2149 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
|
Great article.
Historically, the executive branch hasn't won these confrontations straight-out. IMO, because a man was killed as a result of Fast & Furious, I believe the key witnesses will testify and the unredacted documents will be shown eventually to the subcommittee. |
May 4, 2012, 09:35 AM | #2150 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Posts: 3,847
|
Re the possibility olf a contempt citation being brought against AG Holder, this arising out of DOJ stonewalling regarding Operation Fast & Furious, same would be nice to see but realistically I won't hold my breath waiting .to see said citation enacted and papers served on Holder.
I could well be wrong, but I expect that the thing will turn out more or less as follows. All this talk of the AG being cited for contempt, there were a couple of mentions of same heard on newscasts yesterday, I think that the whold miserable business will be swept under the carpet, given that The Congress lacks the guts to address this fiasco, as it should be addressed. In conclusion, I hope I,m wrong, but we shall have to await such endings as are obtained. |
Tags |
atf , fast and furious |
|
|