The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 6, 2018, 02:20 PM   #1
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
New Bipartisan Gun Bill on NICS Denials

Pro-RKBA and gun grabbers have teamed up to introduce a bill requiring the FBI to report NICS denials to state law enforcement agencies within 24 hours, as well as require the Justice Department to regularly report on prosecutions for lying on the 4473.

As some of you are aware, NICS made over 76,000 denials in 2010. Of those, 4,732 were referred to ATF field branches for further investigation. Only 62 were actually prosecuted.

The idea behind the new law is to start arresting people when they attempt to obtain a firearm by lying on the 4473 and slipping through one of the many gaps in NICs.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politic...kground-check/
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old March 6, 2018, 06:02 PM   #2
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Enforce an existing law?

What a novel idea! If you think about it, it's a sad commentary when you have to pass a law to try to get a law enforcement agency to enforce a law that's already on the books.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 6, 2018, 06:06 PM   #3
ammo.crafter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 1,967
Badges? We have no stinkin' badges.

It must be nice to have unlimited funds to play with. It's a shame, it's our money.
__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
--Thomas Jefferson
ammo.crafter is offline  
Old March 6, 2018, 07:22 PM   #4
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
On the plus side, enforcing existing law is a nice change from “The last 20 laws we haven’t enforced aren’t working. Time to pass more laws!”
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old March 6, 2018, 08:00 PM   #5
BBarn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2015
Posts: 887
I'm afraid the approvals may be causing more grief to lawful gun owners than the denials.
BBarn is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 03:57 AM   #6
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
How does this work.

Lying on a federal form is a Federal crime, how is this a State's issue?
steve4102 is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 06:52 AM   #7
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,817
For years, I've been arguing that current law needs to be better enforced before new laws should be enacted. I'll need to look at the bill, but if the article's accurate, I don't see a problem with this bill.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some.
Spats McGee is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 09:47 AM   #8
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve4102
Lying on a federal form is a Federal crime, how is this a State's issue?
State and local law enforcement has more resources to go after offenders than the Feds do. Additionally, many states have laws that mirror federal law regarding attempted acquisition of firearms by convicted criminals and/or people subject to protective orders, so this would allow state and local LE to go after offenders on state charges immediately, rather than waiting on the ATF bureaucracy to work; it cuts out the middleman, so to speak.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak
carguychris is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 09:59 AM   #9
Leader
Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2005
Posts: 27
How about a law requiring a report on the amount of false positives from background checks?
How about making the check for the same things in ALL states?
Owning a 10 round mag in NY is a felony and 100% legal in most states.
Why does writing a bad check stop you from buying or owning a gun?
Why is all mental illness a dis qualifier when 99+% of mental patients never show any form of violence?

We don't need background checks or laws that prohibit owning a gun, killing , hurting or robbing with a gun are already illegal.
Leader is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 10:03 AM   #10
Lohman446
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
Why is all mental illness a dis qualifier
Is all mental illness a dis qualifier?
Lohman446 is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 10:37 AM   #11
Evan Thomas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lohman446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leader
Why is all mental illness a dis qualifier
Is all mental illness a dis qualifier?
No, it emphatically is not, nor should be. If you read Form 4473, question 11(f) reads as follows: Have you ever been adjudicated as a mental defective OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?

To be disqualified by mental illness, a person must have been found by a court to be mentally incapable or a danger to self or others. It's not the mental illness as such that's disqualifying.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry.
Evan Thomas is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 10:40 AM   #12
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
Lohman I've never seen or heard your question addressed in any rational way. There is a big difference in mild depression that is tied to a traumatic life experience like loss of a loved one, and psychosis that causes a complete break with reality.

Who decides? A governmental bureaucrat? A medical professional with a political agenda? Local law enforcement? What sort of appeal process is in place to assure due process?

I'm all for keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and other dangerous people. Unfortunately as a gun carrying citizen, I fit that definition according to many.
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin
K_Mac is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 10:43 AM   #13
BBarn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2015
Posts: 887
With NICS in place, use of the 4473 should be discontinued. Not even sure it's a reasonable expectation for everyone to tell the truth on the form due to the 5th amendment issues.
BBarn is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 10:47 AM   #14
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
Evan it is the process for removing the right to buy or own guns that I am worried about. An ex-wife with a grudge enough? A neighbor who doesn't like my lawn grooming style? The meer suggestion of erratic behavior to local law enforcement?
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin
K_Mac is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 10:54 AM   #15
Lohman446
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
Evan it is the process for removing the right to buy or own guns that I am worried about. An ex-wife with a grudge enough? A neighbor who doesn't like my lawn grooming style? The meer suggestion of erratic behavior to local law enforcement?
The process and the impacts of the process.

For instance let's consider that I start to notice some symptoms that are consistent with schizophrenia in myself. Do I go and see a mental health professional and seek treatment knowing that such treatment MAY, with an adjustment in the laws, ban me from owning firearms?

What about depression? Are we going to trust our politicians to make an inclusive list of mental illnesses and severity we are concerned with or our judicial system sorting out those questions?
Lohman446 is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 11:06 AM   #16
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Not even sure it's a reasonable expectation for everyone to tell the truth on the form due to the 5th amendment issues.
You may consider lying on the form as a protected right, it is not. The 5th Amendment says you are not compelled to witness against yourself in a criminal case. Of course if you lie on your form you may have the opportunity to use it. That assumes you will be prosecuted...
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin
K_Mac is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 11:37 AM   #17
Evan Thomas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_Mac
Evan it is the process for removing the right to buy or own guns that I am worried about. An ex-wife with a grudge enough? A neighbor who doesn't like my lawn grooming style? The meer suggestion of erratic behavior to local law enforcement?
Did you note the underlined portion of my reply? The part that reads "by a court"? This is what is technically known as "due process."

For someone to be adjudicated mentally defective, a court must hold a hearing on a person's competence, find them incapable of handling their own affairs, and appoint a legal guardian. This isn't something that's treated casually, nor is it something which lends itself to nuisance complaints of the kind you mention. Similarly, the process of involuntarily committing someone to a mental institution requires a court to review evidence and find that the person is a danger to themselves or others. It puts a substantial burden of proof on those making the request, as it should -- depriving someone of liberty (and other rights) isn't something to be undertaken casually.

We're now seeing attempts to weaken these processes in the name of safety, and -- regrettably -- many of these proposals are coming from pro-gun people who are essentially scapegoating people with mental illness, who are far less likely to perpetrate violence than to be its victims.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry.
Evan Thomas is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 11:55 AM   #18
BBarn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2015
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_Mac View Post
You may consider lying on the form as a protected right, it is not. The 5th Amendment says you are not compelled to witness against yourself in a criminal case. Of course if you lie on your form you may have the opportunity to use it. That assumes you will be prosecuted...
I don't consider lying on the form a protected right, but I am saying it's not reasonable to expect everyone to tell the truth on the form, especially given the 5th amendment issues. I'm not sure the standard argument about the 5th Amendment only applying in a criminal case measures up to reality. It seems likely that statements given on the form could be used against someone in a criminal case at a later date. The 4473 even states as much, and you suggested it as well.

In most (all?) other criminal cases, a person will be made aware of charges against them and be given the Miranda warning so that subsequent statements will be considered admissible. Such is not the case with the 4473. In fact the 4473 seems to be a deliberate attempt to circumvent potential 5th Amendment issues.
BBarn is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 11:59 AM   #19
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan Thomas
No, it emphatically is not, nor should be. If you read Form 4473, question 11(f) reads as follows: Have you ever been adjudicated as a mental defective OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
And the question is followed by a note to see the instructions for question 11f, which say:

Quote:
Question 11.f. Adjudicated as a Mental Defective: A determination by a court,
board, commission, or other lawful authority that a person, as a result of marked
subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease: (1) is
a danger to himself or to others; or (2) lacks the mental capacity to contract or
manage his own affairs. This term shall include: (1) a finding of insanity by a court
in a criminal case; and (2) those persons found incompetent to stand trial or found not
guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility.

Committed to a Mental Institution: A formal commitment of a person to a mental
institution by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority. The term
includes a commitment to a mental institution involuntarily. The term includes
commitment for mental defectiveness or mental illness. It also includes commitments
for other reasons, such as for drug use. The term does not include a person in a
mental institution for observation or a voluntary admission to a mental institution.
https://www.atf.gov/file/61446/download
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 12:07 PM   #20
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
Your argument is flawed BB. You certainly have the right to not answer a question on the form. Lying on the form, or in court is not a protected right. I will leave further discussion to those more familiar with the nuances of the law.
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin
K_Mac is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 12:18 PM   #21
Lohman446
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
We're now seeing attempts to weaken these processes in the name of safety, and -- regrettably -- many of these proposals are coming from pro-gun people who are essentially scapegoating people with mental illness, who are far less likely to perpetrate violence than to be its victims.
To me that is the crux of the issue. Properly treated mental health issues are, like many other treated medical conditions, not a major threat to public safety. If we start removing rights from those who have sought or are seeking treatment we create untreated mental health issues because people will be hesitant to seek treatment. Untreated mental health issues are a concern.
Lohman446 is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 12:19 PM   #22
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
I certify that my answers in Section A are true, correct, and complete. I have read and understand the Notices, Instructions, and Definitions on ATF
Form 4473. I understand that answering "yes" to question 11.a. if I am not the actual transferee/buyer is a crime punishable as a felony under
Federal law, and may also violate State and/or local law. I understand that a person who answers "yes" to any of the questions 11.b. through 11.i
and/or 12.b. through 12.c. is prohibited from purchasing or receiving a firearm. I understand that a person who answers "yes" to question 12.d.1. is
prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm, unless the person answers "yes" to question 12.d.2. and provides the documentation required in
18.c. I also understand that making any false oral or written statement, or exhibiting any false or misrepresented identification with respect to this
transaction, is a crime punishable as a felony under Federal law, and may also violate State and/or local law. I further understand that the repetitive
purchase of firearms for the purpose of resale for livelihood and profit without a Federal firearms license is a violation of Federal law. (


The above is copied from the form. It makes it perfectly clear that lying on this form is a felony. Committing a felony is not protected by the 5th Amendment.
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin
K_Mac is offline  
Old March 7, 2018, 12:30 PM   #23
zipspyder
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2017
Posts: 429
It's funny how strictly enforcing the laws we currently have would solve the majority of the issues.
zipspyder is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11777 seconds with 8 queries