The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 15, 2018, 05:38 PM   #1
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
All in on a 8# jug 556-308

My shooting budget is tight, if you all were to go for a 8 pound jug of powder to feed your 308 and 556 what would it be? 308 is bolt and 556 as ar15 (if that matters). I have developed good loads for both with BLC2, IMR 4895, and IMR 4064. I shoot 1-2k or so per year of each. I know that one powder for all might be a stretch, and may be leaving some velocity and such on the table. But to spend $200 on a jug of powder to feed all (bullet weights + 2 cal) what would you go for? 4064 also works well for other cal I'm loading for, and has preformed well in the 2 aforementioned cal. Is their a powder that I'm not considering (varget or others)? Am I asking too much of one powder?

As always thanks for your input.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old September 15, 2018, 06:35 PM   #2
Bimus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2018
Location: Farmington NM
Posts: 122
I have no problems in semi autos when Winchester 748 is used in both.
Bimus is offline  
Old September 15, 2018, 07:40 PM   #3
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
Depending on the weight of the bullets , in general I'd say - 748 , Varget , 8208xbr ,
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
Old September 15, 2018, 08:35 PM   #4
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
55 to75gr in one and 150 to 180gr in the other.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old September 15, 2018, 10:09 PM   #5
Mule
Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2002
Location: Franklin County Missouri
Posts: 84
WC - 844 or WC -846 from Jeff Bartlet half the price
__________________
Shoot Safe!
Shoot Often!
Mule is offline  
Old September 15, 2018, 10:38 PM   #6
hounddawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
I am sure that all mentioned will work but I doubt any will deliver the flexibility and temperature stability than Varget does
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek
hounddawg is offline  
Old September 15, 2018, 10:57 PM   #7
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
Quote:
I am sure that all mentioned will work but I doubt any will deliver the flexibility and temperature stability than Varget does
Agreed , how ever 8208xbr only lacks on getting you max velocities . It does real well but Varget will likely edge it out . It was specifically developed to be temp stable , it may even be more temp stable then Varget . I believe 8208xbr is stable from 20* through 140* or something like that . Might even be below zero to well over 100 degrees .

So I'd drop the 748 and my first choice would be Varget with 8208xbr second .

There are so many variables to consider that have nothing to do with ballistics . Like both those powders are short cut stick powders and fill the case faster and don't throw as well as 748 . This is why I even considered throwing in H-335 as a possible choice . It is also the reason I DID NOT throw in IMR-4064 which works great in both those cartridges but fills the 223 case way to fast to where most of my loads are compressed in 223 using IMR-4064 and it throws like crap .

So your reloading procedures matter as well . If you weigh every charge then stick powder is no big deal but if you run or plan on running a progressive some day . Then a powder that throws from a powder measure more consistently may be better in the long run .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .

Last edited by Metal god; September 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM.
Metal god is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 08:38 AM   #8
Charlie98
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Location: Great state of Texas
Posts: 1,077
For the most part I would agree with what Metal God said... I've not had very good luck with stick powders (IMR's) in the .223, although they gave reasonable accuracy. I have a 20#+ stash of IMR4895 and I don't use it in .223... I just bit the bullet and bought an 8# of H335.

You might also consider something like TAC, it's a little less expensive than some of the others and I've read of good results in both .308 and .223.

OP, I would probably figure out which cartridge you load for more... .223 or .308... and pick the best powder for that cartridge that you can also use the other... until you can afford another 8# of powder for the other cartridge. I've found powder selection in .308 a little less picky vs .223, particularly for a bolt gun, so I would probably put the emphasis on .223 powder. YMMV
__________________
_______________

"I have this pistol pointed at your heart!"
"That is my least vulnerable spot."
Charlie98 is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 10:27 AM   #9
reinert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 646
First, 308Loader, I don't shoot anywhere near as much as you do, but lately, I've discovered Varget. After using IMR 4350 a lot through the years for my 6MM Rem. and my '06s, I'm using loads now for those rifles using Varget. It's great stuff. I also have been using it in my .223 and my 30-30s. All good, all around. If this stuff keeps working as it has for me lately, I'm being more persuaded that it IS the all-around, one and only propellant I'd need (IMO). I can only imagine that the .308 could/would shoot well with Varget and proper load development. I'm talking about loads used for hunting in my usage here, so one-hole, bench-rest accuracy isn't necessarily what I'm after with my hunting rifles. I have shot some of my very best 5-shot targets (100yds.) with my .223 using Varget. It's just a factory Rem 700, out of the box, and is capable of .5" groups when well rested. I'm absolutely good with that. Varget is the only propellant I use in that rifle now. Last year I dropped a good 4x4 mulie with one of my 06s using a Varget load, and that's the first time I've ever varied from my old IMR 4350 loadings. I'll use that Varget load again this year chasing mulies. I you haven't tried Varget yet, get a pound and maybe you'll be surprised.
reinert is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 10:44 AM   #10
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
Thanks for all the reply's. I might have to try the varget, I've been hearing good things about it for a while. might have to try a # before I go in on 8.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 11:58 AM   #11
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
IMR4064. It's more consistently accurate than IMR4895. At least with 168 grain match bullets.
"...might have to try a # before I go in on 8..." Always work up the load before buying anything in bulk.
"...most of my loads are compressed in 223 using IMR-4064..." Max loads of IMR4064 are compressed with most cartridges. Including .308 and .223 with all bullet weights. So are Varget loads with both cartridges and all bullet weights. Compression usually starts at less than mid range loads. Compressed loads are nothing to worry about.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 12:31 PM   #12
Road_Clam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,691
Win 748, and a close second is H4895. I've got about 37# of W748, awesome gas gun powder, and works well with lighter 147-168 gr 308 bullets.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid"
Road_Clam is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 02:58 PM   #13
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
"IMR4064. It's more consistently accurate than IMR4895. At least with 168 grain match bullets."

I have found this to be true, that's why I go through enough of it to consider an 8#er. I have been playing with it in the 223/556 and have also found some good loads there.

"I've got about 37# of W748,"

holey cow! now that's all in!
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 03:43 PM   #14
hounddawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
Quote:
Charlie_98 -

OP, I would probably figure out which cartridge you load for more... .223 or .308... and pick the best powder for that cartridge that you can also use the other... until you can afford another 8# of powder for the other cartridge. I've found powder selection in .308 a little less picky vs .223, particularly for a bolt gun, so I would probably put the emphasis on .223 powder. YMMV
Yesterday 11:57 PM
that is true, seems the less volume the pickier it is, I would pick a .223 bullet weight, find a good powder with known accurate pet loads for that weight and also works well in .308
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek
hounddawg is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 03:52 PM   #15
Average Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,323
I reload for .223/5.56 and .308/7.62x51. and I use W748 for both, have tried others, but for best metering you can't beat W748, and also has very low flash....Shoots great, and pretty accurate too.
Average Joe is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 03:54 PM   #16
Ben Dover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2013
Location: High up in the Rocky Moun
Posts: 665
WCC 844 and 846 (H335 and BLC-#2)_ are some of the very best for .223 and.308.

they're excellent for a dozen other calibres as well. I buy 8# jugs of both.
__________________
The soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as the prisoner's chains. Dwight Eisenhower

It is very important what a man stands for.
But it is far more important what a man refuses to stand for.
Ben Dover is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 04:16 PM   #17
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
I shoot 2 308 bolt guns (rem 700p and savage mod 10-t-sr) off bench with the 168's most frequently. I also shoot lots of AR15 out of two rifles one 16" and one 20" (not really precision rifles 1-2" @100). The AR's seem to eat more than the 308's due to their semi auto nature and my lack of self control. That coupled with the fact that the 308 case is two 556's in powder charge (roughly) makes it hard to gauge what I use more powder on. I think for my use, a tack driver 308 and acceptable or better 556 is the goal. My 308 loads are working well for me from 168-180, I'm happy. The 556 are still a work in progress, haven't settled on a bullet I like for both. I charge from the Hornady auto charge trickle thingy so extruded powders don't bother me too much. Even when throwing with the old dispenser and trickling up to weight I'm ok with the stick powder, its slow but it is ok. I haven't timed it yet but I would bet over a hundred rounds the old way is faster, with the over charges the auto thingy randomly tosses. but I digress... varget looks like a shorter stick than 4064, might work out better?
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.

Last edited by 308Loader; September 16, 2018 at 04:26 PM.
308Loader is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 04:24 PM   #18
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
So the WCC (western cartridge?) are pull down powders? I have no experience with them. I read some where that's how hodgdon got started, blending these powders for civilian use? lots differ greatly? I apologize for my ignorance.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 05:31 PM   #19
FITASC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,422
Varget for both; otherwise 748 for .223 and 760 for .308 with the possibility of 4064 as a good alternative.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa
FITASC is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 06:46 PM   #20
thallub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
My .223 re-loads use bullets to and including 62 grains. The heaviest bullet used in .308 is 150 grains.

Been using IMR 3031 for both calibers since 1967-68. IMR 3031 has worked very well for me. It beats W748.
thallub is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 09:38 PM   #21
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
Quote:
WCC 844 and 846 (H335 and BLC-#2)_ are some of the very best for .223 and.308.
Please correct me if I'm wrong guys but isn't the 844 & 846 the bulk grade powders . Meaning a 8lb jug of 844 may end up being nowhere close to the burn rate of the next canister grade H-335 will be . Which translates to the loads you worked up with the 844 may not transfer over to H-335 later when you buy that . You will have to do a completely new work up when you change from 844 to H-335 ???? Unlike canister grade powders where you are much more likely to have a much closer burn rate from lot to lot .

If you're going to buy the surplus stuff I'd buy much more then 8lbs . It's good stuff but I'd want to have a lot on hand so I can use the same lot for much longer then a 8lb jug would last shooting two different cartridges in multiple rifles .

If it were me I'd stick with canister grade powders to help the likelihood the loads I've already worked up will work the same or close to it with the next jug I buy , but that's just me .

As for the OP , If you are already happy with IMR-4064 , that's the 8lb jug I'd get . I see no reason to start over with all your loadings when you are already using a great powder and perfectly happy with it .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
Old September 16, 2018, 09:57 PM   #22
Bigdaddysmith
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 22, 2017
Posts: 3
I've been using Hodgdon CFE 223 for both seems to be working out well for me. I run a Anderson ar15 and a dpms oracle lr308. Aldo a Remington 700 308. I'm not a great marksman but it kills the deer and coyotes nicely. I use Hornady 75gr bthp match for ar15 for varmint control. Hornady 150gr SST for deer.
Bigdaddysmith is offline  
Old September 17, 2018, 07:13 AM   #23
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Lots of folks use the same powder for both. I don't because a "good" 308 powder is going to be very "slow" for the .223 and a "good" .223 powder is going to be at the "fast" end of suitable for a .308.
If using the loads in DI semi-auto rifles, this tends to cause gassing issues. IMHO
Mobuck is offline  
Old September 17, 2018, 08:43 AM   #24
Charlie98
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Location: Great state of Texas
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Lots of folks use the same powder for both. I don't because a "good" 308 powder is going to be very "slow" for the .223 and a "good" .223 powder is going to be at the "fast" end of suitable for a .308.
I would also tend to agree, but I've always been intrigued by the 'one powder for everything' exercise. I've since branched out... in .308 I use IMR3031 for my 16" barreled/150grn bullet loads, but have gone to IMR4064 for my 24" barreled bolt gun with 168-175grn bullets... but I could (and have) used IMR4895 for both. My primary powder for anything .223 is H335, and even though it's burn rate is right there with IMRs 3031, 8208, and 4895... and even W748, I've never tried it in .308.
__________________
_______________

"I have this pistol pointed at your heart!"
"That is my least vulnerable spot."
Charlie98 is offline  
Old September 17, 2018, 09:08 AM   #25
Bfglowkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2018
Posts: 302
Reloder 15, TAC or Varget. BLC2 as my runner up
Bfglowkey is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05915 seconds with 8 queries