May 26, 2018, 07:14 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
|
Gun Storage Laws
The family of a student killed in the Texas shooting has filed a law suit against the shooters parents. The suit claims that the parents did not do enough to keep the guns away from the shooter. Apparently, Texas currently has laws that require gun owners to take steps to assure minors cannot access their guns. Also, recently Texas Governor Abbott has stated that he is open to possibly making those laws tougher.
I agree weapons should be secured from children, but teenagers are very adept at getting around safeguards. So, I’m concerned that even adults that take reasonable precautions could be held responsible for their teen’s actions. Then part of me says, “of course they should be held responsible” but then I wonder where it ends. Anyway, what do y’all thank? Should States have laws governing the proper storage of firearms and how far should those laws go? http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/05/26...s-parents.html
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
May 26, 2018, 12:59 PM | #2 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
I note that you said the Texas law requires measures to prevent "minors" from accessing firearms. Does the Texas law define "minor"? My state has a safe storage law. It applies if there are children under the age of 16 in the residence. I believe the Santa Fe, Texas, shooter was 17. If so, my state's law would not have applied.
Don't know where the Texas law cuts off. Quote:
For example, California defines (or certifies) what's acceptable for a firearms storage container. If I buy the cheapest, flimsiest tin locker on the list and my kid (or some other party) uses a Sawzall or a crowbar to defeat my secure storage, why should I be responsible? The state said that container was secure. Last edited by Aguila Blanca; May 26, 2018 at 01:04 PM. |
|
May 26, 2018, 07:20 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
Firearms storage was the primary issue in the Heller decision. This is what SCOTUS had to say:
"Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. " DC v Heller, page 3
__________________
Time Travelers' Wisdom: Never Do Yesterday What Should Be Done Tomorrow. If At Last You Do Succeed, Never Try Again. |
May 26, 2018, 07:45 PM | #4 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
It's one thing to prohibit a person from maintaining a loaded, functional handgun in his place of residence when he is at home and may need to defend himself. That's a different matter entirely (IMHO) from storage of unused firearms when the owner doesn't need them, and perhaps isn't even at home. My state requires secure storage of firearms when there are children under the age of 16 in the home. When my daughter was under 16, I adhered to that religiously -- but that didn't prevent me from wearing a loaded 1911 in a holster on my belt when I was home. It did prevent her from having unauthorized access to my firearms. She is now 23 years old, and if she comes to visit I will continue to keep them locked up. The law doesn't require it, but she has a history of attempted suicides, and I don't wish to provide the means. |
|
May 29, 2018, 12:32 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2013
Posts: 317
|
Right now the laws range roughly from
a) loosest: culpability if a minor gets access to unsecured gun and commits a crime/harm occurs b) mid: if a minor has access even if they gain no possession and commit no crime c) strongest, and goal of gun control lobby: access by anyone except the owner, with access being outside a safe anytime not in direct control (say carried in the home). EG a guy with no kids keeping his gun on the nightstand when he not home or even when home is committing a per se crime. There is a lot of room in heller for much more egregious laws mandating safes and safety devices. he main win for gun control lobby on this if achieved is a) a shift in insurance coverage, since if it is a crime not to have the firearm in a safe, your homeowners and umbrella maybe void for any coverage of loss/harm since that loss arose out of a crime committed by the insured, and b) removing reasonable expectation tests. An owner with persons under 16, 17, 18 year old* minors in the home, adults who are prohibited in or expected to have access to the home, or adults that may have a mental health issue may currently have to keep any firearms in as safe, but if certain proposed laws are pass your reasonable expectation as to access is moot and you are per se criminally and civilly liable anytime it is not carried/in direct control or in a safe. This is all a shame since there is so much room for education campaigns on storage that is NOT about mandatory laws. I have a $65 rifle "safe" that is California DOJ approved (putatively the most stringent in the US) that could be opened with a butter knife. It is much more important that people know the conditions under which access typically occurs than making laws about boxes that can almost all be opened with screwdrivers. *(some states laws are 16, some 17, some 18, and we can expect this to be pushed to 21 in future) Last edited by TDL; May 29, 2018 at 12:38 PM. |
May 29, 2018, 12:51 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2013
Location: Albany Park, Chicago
Posts: 776
|
I agree that it is all but impossible to store firearms where a determined 17 year old can't access them. Any safe can be accessed given enough time and some tools, and someone who lives in the house will certainly have the time.
|
May 29, 2018, 01:10 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Since nobody has answered this...
Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
May 29, 2018, 03:04 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
Everyone's family situation is different. I guess it is too much to expect that people be responsible parents such as in your case. My kids had access to loaded firearms in their rooms since the age of 14. This made sense for our family situation and there was never an incident. They are now adults. Do we make a "one size fits all" type firearm storage law? Laws are only useful if people comply. Who will ensure compliance and how?
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
May 30, 2018, 09:57 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
The Texas law.
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/child-...tion-in-texas/ Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2018, 11:43 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 21, 2016
Posts: 629
|
To Barry's original question "what do y'all think" ..
I think toddlers should not be playing with box cutters or kitchen knives, as well as guns, and to leave either where they can access them is bad parenting but not necessarily a criminal act. It could be a basic mistake, ie guest loads sharp knife in dishwasher, toddler opens dishwasher and accesses sharp knife. If you are in a state where a 16 year old can posses a firearm, which at least when I was a kid I'm not sure the age was even 16 we had them before then, I do not see how you can legislate needing to lock them away. Or at least I can't see how you create a law that says you need to lock guns away from a minor if they are able to posses them legally anyway. Similarly I also draw the line with laws requiring to lock guns up when it comes to just general storage. If someone breaks into a home and steals things I see no responsibility of the owner as far as what is done with those things later. With kids in the home - well if you got a state law that says under X age they can't have guns, then there is logic to mandating security measures. But where do you draw the line? If a 15 year old kid steals a key, or sneaks into his dads bedroom and swipes a handgun from the night stand while his dad is sleeping - is that the parents fault? I don't think so. Seems like you need more around it than simply any breach of such access is a criminal act by the parents. |
May 31, 2018, 12:57 AM | #11 | |||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
The Texas law mentioned by Buzzcook in post 9 deals with criminal liability. But the OP refers to a law suit, i. e., a civil claim for monetary damages.
Tort liability if someone gets your allegedly improperly stored gun and hurts someone with it will generally be based on negligence. Negligence in law is basically: Negligence is generally a question for a jury. Basically the jury will need to decide, after all the evidence about what took place and what everyone said or did is presented whether the defendant acted as a reasonable and prudent person would in the same situation. So --
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|||
May 31, 2018, 05:12 PM | #12 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
OP's Questions was:
Quote:
Quote:
Negligence will most likely have to go to a jury. And to the OP's original question asked and answered above. I am not sure the case cited by Frank would hold up everywhere. It also has less to do with home storage. As always I don't recommend storing a loaded gun in your car but if you have to for some reason.... lock your car and if possible lock your gun up inside your car.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
||
|
|