|
The bottom line is that there is no right "if this than that answer." If all depends on being able to articulate why a reasonable person would have concluded that lethal force is necessary to prevent otherwise unavoidable, immediate death or grave bodily to an innocent.
But I think this has gone about as far as it can go.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper
|
December 10, 2013, 03:41 PM
