|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 24, 2017, 10:54 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
Rumor regarding defending statues with deadly force.
A person formerly associated with a department in tx blogged a post containing text ostensibly taken from Texas statutes.
http://www.thatsnonsense.com/legal-u...statues-texas/ He stated plainly defense against the destruction of a statue by deadly force. I believe that the laws involve only private, personal property, and that this is clearly a lie, inflammatory and possibly dangerous. Would tx lawyers weigh in and is there any point in sharing the post that debunked it?
__________________
None. Last edited by briandg; August 24, 2017 at 11:03 AM. |
August 24, 2017, 11:41 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
The article clearly states that the guy, a volunteer, reserve officer who was fired after publishing his garbage, was wrong.
There's no need to discuss some idiot's hogwash.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|