The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 9, 2011, 11:13 AM   #1
Mrgunsngear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,415
BAFTE Ruling 2011-4 (SBR)

I saw the press release about BAFTE Ruling 2011-4 about converting a pistol to a SBR and back to a pistol without getting all the SBR paperwork done. Has anyone seen this in writing? I'd like to SBR my Draco and I'd like to skip the $200 and the engraving if I can... Thanks.
Mrgunsngear is offline  
Old August 9, 2011, 11:17 AM   #2
aarondhgraham
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Stillwater, OKlahoma
Posts: 8,638
Wasn't this to accommodate the Beretta NEOS carbine kit?,,,

I read (somewhere) that this ruling was to accommodate the Beretta NEOS Carbine Kit.

Initially the BATFE had given Beretta the okay,,,
Then for some reason they backed off on their okay.

I don't really know the truth of it,,,
But I swear I read it somewhere recently.

Aarond
__________________
Never ever give an enemy the advantage of a verbal threat.
Caje: The coward dies a thousand times, the brave only once.
Kirby: That's about all it takes, ain't it?
Aarond is good,,, Aarond is wise,,, Always trust Aarond! (most of the time)
aarondhgraham is offline  
Old August 9, 2011, 11:33 AM   #3
PTK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 442
You can't get around having a 16"+ barrel and 26" OAL for a rifle, sorry. If you just pop a stock on your Draco, that would be an SBR - you'd have to extend the barrel to at least 16" as well, and make it permanent as far as the BATFE goes.
PTK is offline  
Old August 9, 2011, 12:05 PM   #4
rjrivero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,399
You can convert the pistol into a standard rifle. 16" or greater barrel, Overall length of 26" or more.

Then you can convert it back into a pistol.

YOU CAN NOT MAKE A SBR without filling out the appropriate paperwork.

Read it for yourself. ATF Ruling 2011-4
rjrivero is offline  
Old August 9, 2011, 12:56 PM   #5
Mrgunsngear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,415
RJ--thanks. That's exactly what I was looking for.
Mrgunsngear is offline  
Old August 9, 2011, 01:24 PM   #6
rjrivero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,399
You're welcome. This ruling DOES bring about a few interesting questions.

For instance, if you have a new stripped lower, can you build it into a pistol FIRST, then go ahead and build it into what ever rifle configuration you want to build it into, and then convert it to a PISTOL again??

If so, constructive posession becomes more dubious. as long as you own a pistol buffer tube, you could own short barrel uppers for any ar that you built, provided you build it into a pistol FIRST.......hmmm....

It's really quite interesting.
rjrivero is offline  
Old August 10, 2011, 06:29 AM   #7
Mrgunsngear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,415
I think you can do that based on what I read.
Mrgunsngear is offline  
Old August 10, 2011, 08:48 AM   #8
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
Here is an interesting question - given the emphasis on close proximity and "no other purpose", let's say I have multiple AR rifles and an AR pistol. I decide to convert the AR pistol to a rifle and take it to the range with me. I remove the short barrelled upper and leave it in the safe with my other ARs while I spend a day at the range.

Are my other family members now in constructive possession of an unregistered SBR because the combination of weapons remaining in the safe is only good for making an SBR since I have the pistol lower?
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old August 11, 2011, 09:52 AM   #9
rjrivero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,399
Excellent question, Mr. Roberts. As will most of this ATF stuff, it's clear as mud.

Very interesting scenario building with this new Ruling from the ATF.

How does the ATF make "rulings" anyway? Silly me, but I thought that "Rulings" were the exclusive purview of our Judicial branch of the government.
rjrivero is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07910 seconds with 10 queries