July 2, 2013, 02:50 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2009
Posts: 1,102
|
Justified in shooting?
Sounds simple but a lot of factors are at play!
I am disabled, heck a 9 year old girl could knock me over! The other nite I just missed a couple punks trying to steal my Truck! I awoke ans still sleepy didn't get dressed armed and moving fast enough to confront them! When I got up they were gone due to the front porch light coming on and the screen door noise. Now had I caaught them all I could justifilably do is hold them at gunpoint till the police got there. Unless: They moved against me to do me harm. One or both displayed a weapon. But what if they just tryed ti run? Heck I couldn't shoot. I also am in such bad shape I couldn't tackle one either! I'd have been left standing there with my Model 36 waving bye-bye! Maybe it's best I didn't get out there or someone woulda got hurt or worse! The trucks steering colum is wiped out but there's insurance to cover that Maybe God had it planned right for my sake? BPDave |
July 2, 2013, 04:17 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Call 911.
Quote:
|
|
July 2, 2013, 04:29 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2013
Posts: 779
|
Shooting someone is a life sentence, even if exonerated and ajudged "Justified". Best thing that could happen to YOU is that they run away.
Sgt Lumpy |
July 2, 2013, 04:44 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
|
Re: Justified in shooting?
|
July 2, 2013, 04:55 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2009
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 1,569
|
Can the threat of deadly force be used to detain, if the crooks don't threaten?
That's a real corker! May depend on your state and/or local laws. Makes one miss the good ol days, when the choices were simple, when you caught someone was trying to steal your horse.
__________________
A lack of planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an emergency on my part. |
July 2, 2013, 05:03 PM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,046
|
Have to disagree with most on here so far.
|
July 2, 2013, 05:45 PM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://coolice.legis.iowa.gov/cool-i...code&input=710 http://kidnapping.uslegal.com/state-....oolcL6gu.dpuf
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
||
July 2, 2013, 05:56 PM | #8 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hmmm. I am not an attorney but it is pretty evident that no one else here is either. Most of the larger libraries have copies of that state's code; I suggest going to the library (not a quickie search on "the net") and read a few of your own state's laws on homicide, murder, self defense, citizens arrest, detention after an observed felony, manslaughter, etc. You might be in for a few surprises.
Jim |
July 2, 2013, 05:58 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 320
|
You have to prove "self defense" it could get pretty grey. and get expensive and risky.
|
July 2, 2013, 06:03 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
LOL, there is nothing wrong with the internet if you look of proper sites. Going to the library isn't going to yield information any different on a particular state's code than going to the state's own website and looking up the code there.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
July 2, 2013, 06:15 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
I don't like to tell others what they should or could do but I will say that [I] will use a firearm to protect my life or the life of a family member. I will not use a firearm to capture anyone.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
July 2, 2013, 06:20 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2012
Location: Wendell, N.C.
Posts: 189
|
^^^^This!!
|
July 2, 2013, 06:39 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Posts: 527
|
IIRC, in Tx it is legal to shoot anyone if they are in the middle of committing a felony.
One story comes to mind where the home owner shoots the bad guys as they are running away, kills one (maybe both, I dont remember) and no charges were filed because the bad guys were in the middle of committing a felony. Maybe some Tx guys can jump in and confirm |
July 2, 2013, 07:44 PM | #14 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, 00 Spy,
True, and maybe I am old-fashioned, but internet searches tend to look up keywords and see only one section of the law. With law books in front of you, you can see better the interrelation of the laws and sections of the laws. It is pretty common for one section of the law to track to another, either supporting or even seeming to contradict another, and it is not easy to correlate everything you need to know using a web search. Lawyers and researchers will use on-line searches to find the pertinent laws and do the preliminary looking, but I think they will all end up with a table full of open law books. Jim |
July 2, 2013, 08:17 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
Sgt Lumpy has very wise words. He's not saying you'll go to prison forever. He's saying if you have to shoot someone you will personally live with that for the rest of your life.
He is right, the best thing that can happen to you is the punks run away and get caught before they can cause another crime. To that end, I recommend a good security camera. If you hold them at gunpoint, in some states, it may be legal (threat of force is not the same as using force). However, it is an empty threat as you can't then shoot them if they decide to get up and run away. |
July 2, 2013, 10:41 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 243
|
You have to look at your local laws.
As far as I am concerned you are justified in shooting them. But I'm only concerned as far as stating my opinion based on my personal hatred for thieves. The local law may come down on you very hard, even if they do come in and start beating the daylights out of you. Depending on where you are. You also may have to deal with their gang, their friends and family. You can imagine the 'mommy dears' whining and crying about how their innocent little babies were such good kids. So it probably would not be a good idea to shoot them (depending on your jurisdiction), even as much as I would like to see that. But check on your local self defense courses and firearms courses. dc |
July 3, 2013, 02:59 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: May 11, 2013
Posts: 99
|
I think we can all take a lesson from George Z if there are any questions about when you might not want to shoot.
Sadly the laws in this country regarding use of deadly force to protect property need to change. In many areas they are pretty much ignored anyway. Even in California I remember during the LA Riot I was in Koreatown taking photos (and I had a pistol on my belt and a shotgun in my car) and nobody was messing with the Koreans on their roofs and in front of their shops with automatic weapons. Last edited by Frank Ettin; July 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM. Reason: delete snark |
July 3, 2013, 08:39 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Then again, a bunch of people involved in such shootings are acquitted. No verdict in for the case you cite so it really doesn't apply here as due process is ongoing.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
July 3, 2013, 09:33 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Isn't there the legal defense of disproportionate of force?
Multiple young criminals vs one disabled victim, whether they are armed or not?
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
July 3, 2013, 10:18 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: March 26, 2012
Posts: 19
|
text of the statutes is not enough
Getting back to reading the law at the library. I'm not an attorney, but I have some relevant experience. A lot (most?) of the law is not in the actual statutes, but in court precedents (case law) that expand on what is in the statutes. For example, the fourth amendment (statutory law) lays out general limitations on searches and seizures by government, but it is the case law that gives you the details, such as whether police can search a container in a car, etc. In addition, you have the issue of whether a case has been appealed to a higher court and has been ruled on. Those factors determine in what places it is legal to do a certain action.
I guess my point would be that when you try to explore the law on your own, you can easily come to wrong conclusions. |
July 3, 2013, 10:33 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 117
|
I second call 911 & let the police handle it.
__________________
"Blessed be the Lord my strength,which teacheth my hands to war and my fingers to fight". Psalm 144:1 KJV Be safe: Paul |
July 3, 2013, 10:48 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 876
|
I don't think it is legal to use deadly force if the thieves are running away without your property, not even here in Texas. That you were able to run them off, save your property and not have to use your weapon is the best outcome you could have.
Let the police handle it from there would be my advise. I might use deadly force to protect my property if needed but would have to weigh the loss against the legal costs that are sure to follow. Poor George Z. has found out all about that. |
July 3, 2013, 11:04 AM | #23 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
July 3, 2013, 11:18 AM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Let's keep Zimmerman out of this.
Quote:
In the OP's case he puts himself in a potentially legally vulnerable position by going out of the house to confront someone -- especially since he has physical limitations. Often the better course would be to call 911, stay in the house, observe and prepare to be a good witness, take photographs, and be prepared to defend yourself if attacked. Let's understand the basic reality of the use of force in self defense.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper Last edited by Frank Ettin; July 3, 2013 at 07:10 PM. Reason: correct typo |
|
July 3, 2013, 07:09 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2005
Posts: 955
|
Again I ask the question. Do I have to shoot to protect life?? If you cant reply a resounding yes you should not shoot. Just that simple. You better think twice before you go out and hold some one at gun point. What are you going to do if you tell them to get down on the ground and they tell you to pound sand?? Now what??
__________________
Colt King Cobra .357 Colt Anaconda .44mag Springfield Armory .45 Double stack Loaded XD40 service XD45 Taurus 617 .357mag Smith M&P 40 |
|
|