|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 28, 2006, 03:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2006
Location: California
Posts: 441
|
largest game that can be humanely taken with a 9mm carbine?
Is a deer about a large as you should go with a full house 9mm load?
|
September 28, 2006, 03:10 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,716
|
No
I wouldn't even consider a 9mm as a potential deer round. there are 100's of better choices out there.
The .357 is marginal for deer and the 9mm is less powerful than the .357. You are looking at wounding a deer and having it die a slow death.... |
September 28, 2006, 03:19 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2005
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 212
|
Do you have anything larger???? If that is the only rifle you have you better limit your shots to bow range (like 30 yards) and the deer had better be on the small side.
Better yet, barrow something with suitable like a 30-30, .243, .270, .3006 etc. |
September 28, 2006, 03:22 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: March 20, 2006
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 93
|
Groundhogs.
|
September 28, 2006, 03:42 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
I am not sure I would choose a 9mm for any game animal. It has just barely enough muzzle energy to pierce hide and penetrate to vitals. I suppose you could take a smallish deer, but that would have to be at point blank range.
And that does not even deal with the legality of using that cartridge for game animals. Or the ethical considerations.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
September 28, 2006, 03:47 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2006
Location: California
Posts: 441
|
I also have a 7.62x39 autoloader. I am not really much of a hunter, but I am curious about the limitations of these rounds in the hunting sphere.
|
September 28, 2006, 04:17 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
|
coyote/beaver
|
September 28, 2006, 04:56 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2006
Location: California
Posts: 441
|
coyote, bingo
|
September 28, 2006, 05:44 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 953
|
coyote within 20 yards.
|
September 28, 2006, 06:27 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2005
Location: Lutz
Posts: 1,528
|
Out of your choices? Use the 7.62, keep it close, use the best hunting ammo you can find, if you hand load even better, get lots of practice. I live in Florida where the deer aren't exactly monsters. Quite a few people in my circle of aquaintances use 7.62x39 for Whitetail (again, smallish Whitetail).
If you're looking to take larger game, go spend $90 or so and get an excellent condition Mosin Nagant M38. Good hunting ammo with plenty of oomph, good enough accuracy for hunting at reasonable distances, cheap, a blast to shoot. These are very popular in the area near here for pig/brush guns. |
September 28, 2006, 06:40 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2005
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 394
|
If you use the 7.62x39, I'd say deer up to about 150 yards is reasonable if you can shoot that well. I wouldn't even consider the 9mm.
__________________
si vis pacem, parabellum |
September 28, 2006, 11:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2005
Posts: 1,276
|
Usama bin Laden...
|
September 28, 2006, 11:33 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2005
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 254
|
A canary.
|
September 28, 2006, 11:55 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: March 20, 2006
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 93
|
cockroaches?
|
September 29, 2006, 01:10 AM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 21, 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,450
|
|
October 2, 2006, 11:48 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2005
Posts: 208
|
I've taken a 200 lb russian boar with a 9mm carbine (147 grain Federal Hydrashok) with no problems.
|
October 2, 2006, 02:34 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2005
Posts: 1,177
|
shot placement
I've got a 9mm Ruger Police Carbine that shoots real well and:
a) on a calm day b) deer standing still c) +/- 40 yards I think I could confidently make a head shot and drop a deer, but there are to many factors/variables that could prevent you from being able to get such a perfect shot. Shooting +P+ hollow points at varmits such as coyote, raccons, armadillos, etc... at 50 yards or less should take them humanely. And I agree with everyone above, the 7.62x39 is a much more powerful round and will outperform the 9mm as a hunting cartridge in every way. There are numerous hollow point and soft point hunting round choices available in 7.62x39.
__________________
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. Claire Wolfe |
October 2, 2006, 04:11 PM | #18 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
|
Quote:
|
|
October 7, 2006, 07:25 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: September 9, 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 48
|
squirls,rabbits
|
October 7, 2006, 06:41 PM | #20 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 31, 2006
Posts: 1,528
|
9MM is not a hunting round and should not be used as one.
How bout ground squirrels you have them in Southern calif. |
October 8, 2006, 09:14 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,248
|
Check your State hunting regulations to find out if your 9mm carbine is legal or not. I'll bet that if your State has any kind of foot pound requirements for rifles your 9mm will fall short. My State requires 1000 ftlb of energy at 100 yards for rifles as a minimum, and I'm sure that a 9mm carbine is well under that requirment. I think you could have some fun using it on small game at close ranges but I wouldn't use it on deer.
|
October 8, 2006, 10:11 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2005
Location: Houston area
Posts: 1,823
|
You will have to check your state hunting regulations. Ethically, I'd say "possum, rabbit, skunk" but NO WAY would I shoot a deer with one.
Springmom
__________________
I will not be a victim home on the web: www.panagia-icons.net (my webpage) www.nousfromspring.blogspot.com (Orthodoxy) "I couldn't hear you. Stop firing the gun while you're talking!" Frank Drebin, The Naked Gun |
October 9, 2006, 07:54 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,716
|
I find it interesting that no one considers the 9mm out of a carbine/ rifle a viable deer hunting round but have no problem using the same round out of a pistol for self defense against roughly the same sized critters....humans..
I'm not trying to start a caliber war but I also find it odd the when you mention the .223 at the tactical side of the range and they they think it's da bomb as a round.....when you mention it to a hunter they think of prairie poodles and wood chucks - 5 to 20 pound animals.....
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. |
October 9, 2006, 08:54 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2005
Location: Houston area
Posts: 1,823
|
The scenarios (please excuse that word, couldn't think of a better, I haven't had my coffee yet) are different.
If I shoot a deer, he is trying not to be seen, and if he sees me, he's going to run. I have to shoot by utter stealth, and the ONE shot I make had better be fatal or else I run the risk of leaving a wounded deer to die of infection somewhere in the bush; If I shoot a human, it is because he is trying to kill me. One shot needs to do the deed, all right; but if I need two or three, I'm not going to take those second or third shots while he's bounding away at 20 mph, like a deer would be. So you're comparing apples and oranges. A better comparison would be using the 9 for a sniper rifle and using the 9 for hunting. I may be all wet, but I don't think ANY SWAT or sniper type folks use 9mms in their sniper rifles. If they are "hunting" a BG, they put something else in those rifles...something more like what we'd use for....DEER! HTH. (I like the 9mm for range shooting. I don't personally think it's "too little gun" for SD. I carry a .38spl a lot, and that IS essentially a 9, albeit with a VERY long case But I want that deer down and dead ASAP for the sake of the animal, so I want to use a rifle cartridge, with higher energy and more damage done, than my 9. ) Springmom
__________________
I will not be a victim home on the web: www.panagia-icons.net (my webpage) www.nousfromspring.blogspot.com (Orthodoxy) "I couldn't hear you. Stop firing the gun while you're talking!" Frank Drebin, The Naked Gun |
October 9, 2006, 09:33 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,716
|
Springmom,
I agreed with most of your assessment and opinion on the differences, IMO I would still be over gunned in a SD situation ( as long as I can handle and shoot it well ) and use just enough gun for hunting. I do find it funny that a few friends tell me all about the magical properties of their round of choice ( say the 9mm or the .223 ) and the oldtimers and hunters look at them as woefully inadequate for most hunting situations.
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. |
|
|