The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 16, 2020, 11:56 AM   #1
GaryED50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
Springfield 1842 Musket at LGS

Awesome find at my LGS. an 1842 Springfield rifled Musket. In very good condition. It was so incredible to pick up and hold this Rifle, if it could only talk and tell about its adventures and service. asking price was $1099.00
[IMG][/IMG]
GaryED50 is offline  
Old August 16, 2020, 12:30 PM   #2
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
An original? Rifled?
I know they went back and rifled a bunch of muskets. A .69 Minie ball is a LARGE projectile.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old August 16, 2020, 05:09 PM   #3
GaryED50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
An original? Rifled?
I know they went back and rifled a bunch of muskets. A .69 Minie ball is a LARGE projectile.
Surprised me too but I took a look with a bore light and its definitely rifled. it was really something to see and examine.
GaryED50 is offline  
Old August 17, 2020, 12:36 PM   #4
44caliberkid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,104
If this is an original arm in VG condition, the price is excellent, should be $2000 - $3000. If it is a reproduction then it is just discounted a couple hundred.
44caliberkid is offline  
Old August 18, 2020, 12:40 AM   #5
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
I'm leaning towards reproduction.
Rifling really wasn't in production till closer to the end of the war.
Civil war that is, so your talking 1863-64.
I was wondering if it shouldn't have been a flintlock, but upon further research the 42' was indeed percussion. The 40's were changed over from flintlock to percussion to make them 42's.
And they were indeed smoothbores.
Even my original 1861 Harpers Ferry is a smoothbore.

Still, nice find & beauty of a musket!
And one you can shoot!
__________________
When our own government declares itself as "tyrannical", where does that leave us??!!

"Januarary 6th insurrection".
Funny, I didn't see a single piece of rope...

Last edited by std7mag; August 18, 2020 at 02:35 AM.
std7mag is offline  
Old August 18, 2020, 07:55 AM   #6
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by std7mag View Post
I'm leaning towards reproduction.
Rifling really wasn't in production till closer to the end of the war.
Civil war that is, so your talking 1863-64.
I was wondering if it shouldn't have been a flintlock, but upon further research the 42' was indeed percussion. The 40's were changed over from flintlock to percussion to make them 42's.
And they were indeed smoothbores.
Even my original 1861 Harpers Ferry is a smoothbore.

Still, nice find & beauty of a musket!
And one you can shoot!
There were 14,000 of them rifled between 1856-1859.
Hawg is offline  
Old August 18, 2020, 03:44 PM   #7
GaryED50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by std7mag View Post
I'm leaning towards reproduction.
Rifling really wasn't in production till closer to the end of the war.
Civil war that is, so your talking 1863-64.
I was wondering if it shouldn't have been a flintlock, but upon further research the 42' was indeed percussion. The 40's were changed over from flintlock to percussion to make them 42's.
And they were indeed smoothbores.
Even my original 1861 Harpers Ferry is a smoothbore.

Still, nice find & beauty of a musket!
And one you can shoot!
Its not a repro my friend

Its one of two authentic muzzle loaders he has in the shop. the other is an Springfield Model 1861. hate to imagine the price on that one
GaryED50 is offline  
Old August 18, 2020, 04:29 PM   #8
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
Ought not to be too bad, there were far more 1861s than reworked 1842s.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old August 19, 2020, 04:58 PM   #9
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryED50 View Post
Its not a repro my friend

Its one of two authentic muzzle loaders he has in the shop. the other is an Springfield Model 1861. hate to imagine the price on that one
You should be able to find a decent 1861 shooter for around 1000.00
Hawg is offline  
Old August 20, 2020, 03:51 PM   #10
GaryED50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawg View Post
You should be able to find a decent 1861 shooter for around 1000.00
Only 1000.00

I thought it would be much higher

Gary
GaryED50 is offline  
Old August 20, 2020, 07:21 PM   #11
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryED50 View Post
Only 1000.00

I thought it would be much higher

Gary
Decent shooter, not a museum piece. You can find them with cut down stocks for a lot less.
Hawg is offline  
Old September 15, 2020, 01:57 PM   #12
GaryED50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
I must apologize and beg a thousand pardons... I had an occasion to drop back by the LGS and examined the musket again and it is a smoothbore

sorry guys

Gary
GaryED50 is offline  
Old September 24, 2020, 02:02 PM   #13
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,838
I've given to believe that some 1842s were rifled subsequent to being made.

That's the difference between a rifled musket (smoothbore musket that has been subsequently rifled) and a rifle musket (long arm originally made with a rifled bore).
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old September 24, 2020, 07:04 PM   #14
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4V50 Gary View Post
I've given to believe that some 1842s were rifled subsequent to being made.

That's the difference between a rifled musket (smoothbore musket that has been subsequently rifled) and a rifle musket (long arm originally made with a rifled bore).
You are correct.
Hawg is offline  
Old September 25, 2020, 05:40 AM   #15
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
The research I did on mine indicated that the 1842 barrels were made 'thicker' in anticipation of future rifling. And as indicated above, quite a few were manufactured with rifling. I understand that the rifled version came with a rear sight.

My wife bought me mine at a local auction for fathers day. That was exiting. Mine isn't rifled either and I have a hard time keeping it on a man sized target at 25 yards. But I bet I could hit a regiment sized target at 100 yards.

My 1861 is much more accurate, though I have only shot it with 58 caliber round ball. Still trying to figure a way to measure its actual bore diameter.

I thought that all 1861's were rifled?
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old September 25, 2020, 06:12 AM   #16
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
"I thought that all 1861's were rifled? "

Yes.

The Model 1842 was the last musket adopted into US service, and it was also the last .69 caliber adopted. Tests at Springfield armory with rifled M1842s vs. what would later become the .58 caliber M1855 showed that the .58 cal. Minie ball was more accurate and had better ballistics and range.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old September 25, 2020, 01:08 PM   #17
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
At $1,099, it's a probably Traditions repro. That's not a bad thing, but $1,099 is a bit less than their MSRP of $1209.
Supposedly rifled after 1855 when the .58 calibre was adopted.
https://americanhistory.si.edu/colle...t/nmah_1202360
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05711 seconds with 10 queries