|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 16, 2020, 11:56 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
Springfield 1842 Musket at LGS
Awesome find at my LGS. an 1842 Springfield rifled Musket. In very good condition. It was so incredible to pick up and hold this Rifle, if it could only talk and tell about its adventures and service. asking price was $1099.00
[IMG][/IMG] |
August 16, 2020, 12:30 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
An original? Rifled?
I know they went back and rifled a bunch of muskets. A .69 Minie ball is a LARGE projectile. |
August 16, 2020, 05:09 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
|
August 17, 2020, 12:36 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,104
|
If this is an original arm in VG condition, the price is excellent, should be $2000 - $3000. If it is a reproduction then it is just discounted a couple hundred.
|
August 18, 2020, 12:40 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
|
I'm leaning towards reproduction.
Rifling really wasn't in production till closer to the end of the war. Civil war that is, so your talking 1863-64. I was wondering if it shouldn't have been a flintlock, but upon further research the 42' was indeed percussion. The 40's were changed over from flintlock to percussion to make them 42's. And they were indeed smoothbores. Even my original 1861 Harpers Ferry is a smoothbore. Still, nice find & beauty of a musket! And one you can shoot!
__________________
When our own government declares itself as "tyrannical", where does that leave us??!! "Januarary 6th insurrection". Funny, I didn't see a single piece of rope... Last edited by std7mag; August 18, 2020 at 02:35 AM. |
August 18, 2020, 07:55 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
Quote:
|
|
August 18, 2020, 03:44 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
Its one of two authentic muzzle loaders he has in the shop. the other is an Springfield Model 1861. hate to imagine the price on that one |
|
August 18, 2020, 04:29 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
Ought not to be too bad, there were far more 1861s than reworked 1842s.
|
August 19, 2020, 04:58 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
|
August 20, 2020, 03:51 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
|
August 20, 2020, 07:21 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
|
September 15, 2020, 01:57 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
I must apologize and beg a thousand pardons... I had an occasion to drop back by the LGS and examined the musket again and it is a smoothbore
sorry guys Gary |
September 24, 2020, 02:02 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,838
|
I've given to believe that some 1842s were rifled subsequent to being made.
That's the difference between a rifled musket (smoothbore musket that has been subsequently rifled) and a rifle musket (long arm originally made with a rifled bore).
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
September 24, 2020, 07:04 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
|
September 25, 2020, 05:40 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
|
The research I did on mine indicated that the 1842 barrels were made 'thicker' in anticipation of future rifling. And as indicated above, quite a few were manufactured with rifling. I understand that the rifled version came with a rear sight.
My wife bought me mine at a local auction for fathers day. That was exiting. Mine isn't rifled either and I have a hard time keeping it on a man sized target at 25 yards. But I bet I could hit a regiment sized target at 100 yards. My 1861 is much more accurate, though I have only shot it with 58 caliber round ball. Still trying to figure a way to measure its actual bore diameter. I thought that all 1861's were rifled?
__________________
John M. Mesa, AZ |
September 25, 2020, 06:12 AM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
|
"I thought that all 1861's were rifled? "
Yes. The Model 1842 was the last musket adopted into US service, and it was also the last .69 caliber adopted. Tests at Springfield armory with rifled M1842s vs. what would later become the .58 caliber M1855 showed that the .58 cal. Minie ball was more accurate and had better ballistics and range.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
September 25, 2020, 01:08 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
At $1,099, it's a probably Traditions repro. That's not a bad thing, but $1,099 is a bit less than their MSRP of $1209.
Supposedly rifled after 1855 when the .58 calibre was adopted. https://americanhistory.si.edu/colle...t/nmah_1202360
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
|
|