January 9, 2013, 10:55 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 351
|
In short,no. I knew a Alaska trooper who would not use slugs in a 12 gauge either. He used 4 BUCK. They are big and you will be in more trouble than you want.
|
January 9, 2013, 10:56 PM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
__________________
QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION |
|
January 10, 2013, 04:10 AM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
"an adult brown bear in nearby coastal Alaska living on a steady, nutritious diet of spawning salmon may weigh as much as 680 kg (1,500 lb)." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_bear Alaskan author Larry Kaniut has a framed photo in his home of a man who survived a bear attack standing next to the stuffed/mounted bear which is also standing. The top of the man's head is just past the middle of the upright bear. Just because Larry has documented a bear attack where a person defended himself against a bear with a folding Buck knife does not mean that I carry a folding Buck knife for such a purpose. If you want to read about actual bear/man encounters I suggest reading one or more of Larry's books. http://www.kaniut.com/ So, to recap: in Alaska a "normal" Brown Bear can weigh 6 - 10 times more than most men, when standing tower between 3 - 4 feet over most men, and is almost as tall as many men standing when it's standing on all fours. Then you can consider the record/larger than normal specimens. "This nine year old girl from the Yukon shot this record brown bear in Alaska on the Alaskan Peninsula in October 2006. Skull size – 33 1/16, 11 feet 9 inches nose to tail, estimated weight – 1,800 pounds. Supposedly this was her first ever bear hunt." Read her father's link, it was a little smaller; really very little. http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2007/...rd-brown-bear/ So, where I live and hike, no .45 auto for the great outdoors.
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
|
January 10, 2013, 04:20 AM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 196
|
A 9 year old girl took a bear that big? Pretty impressive. But that's kinda more proof they are t bullet proof.
No 45ACP isn't a front line weapon. But it can be used if necessary or as a back-up. Either way it's been around for a very very long time and has obviously taken numerous bears too. Just as .22's have. Doesn't meant its the 1st line defense. But to those saying 45ACP is just gona **** the bear off - you're wrong. If that was true then how have people taken down bears with 45ACP? Or dropped them with the low .22 in one shot? Now if your going against a HUGE bear in say Alaska, a 45ACP is risky. Can it work? Of course. Would I use it as first line? Heck no! But nearly any caliber can take out a bear. So if a .22 has taken numerous bears, I'm sure the more powerful 45ACP can too. Again, it's not the best FRONT LINE/1st choice but it can and has worked before. Heck I read a story where a man used a can of axe deodorant and lighter on a bear and got it in the face! Needless to say the bear ran off stumbling into things and hitting things since it just got blasted in the face with fire. But that was a can of axe spray and a lighter that stopped a bear. I'd feel much safer with a 45ACP than a can of hairspray and lighter. |
January 10, 2013, 04:42 AM | #55 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Josh17
Quote:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?ni...&pg=7167,59618 You can win a million dollar lottery: http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/01/08/...1-million-win/ The question is, "Would a reasonable and prudent person expect to or seriously consider defending oneself against a bear with a .45 auto pistol; especially if other alternatives are available?" (In my case in Alaska, I do see these bears every single year when they are out and about.) Given that my personal closest non-hunting bear encounter in the bush ended at about 4 feet, I can assure you that my .45 Automatic Colt Pistols sit in my safe when I am out and about. But, if you want to try the binocs or the lottery tickets...
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
|
January 10, 2013, 04:56 AM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
|
|
January 10, 2013, 09:12 AM | #57 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,367
|
Pennsylvania is home to some kick ass large bears...
http://blogs.wvgazette.com/johnmccoy...-killed-in-pa/ Over the years I've seen several (one in the wild, two shot by hunters) that EASILY topped 6 feet in a standing pose, NOT a reared up paws over head pose. Habitat and food availability ALWAYS plays a role in a critter's ultimate final body size (not just whether they are overweight or not). A critter with the genes to be very large, but which is chronically starved for adequate food, isn't going to grow out to its potential.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 10, 2013, 09:31 AM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
|
Are PA bears big because they are forced to subsist on people who eat philly cheesesteaks?
|
January 10, 2013, 10:02 AM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,472
|
Bears and guns
I have never shot a bear, black, brown or white. That being said, one doesn't have to have had the encounter to know something about the situation.
There is more than a little silliness in some of the posts above as far as the big Bears are concerned. More shots on target with a 1911? Maybe more shots....but on target? In the unfortunate situation wherein we might have to shoot a big bear, it will be charging..over broken ground and moving at close to 30 mph. Maybe I could hit the bear.....but the target is the CNS and much smaller than the whole bear. Hitting that is another thing entirely. And.....one has to get the gun out before shooting....unless you walk around with the gun in your hand. Kinda hard to do when you are walking through the woods to the river to fish and are loaded down with stuff (that I know from experience). Bears have been killed with a .22 rim fire......no doubt. We are not discussing hunting here. We are discussing dealing with an upset bear who is charging at you. You don't want to just kill it, you want to STOP it. Right there and now. Please don't stick to the line that a .22 is a bear stopper. Kill is one thing. Stop is quite another. The last time that I was fishing along the Kenai in AK, I had to hike a couple of hundred yards through the scrub to the river. I was getting out of the car at the same time as another group of guys. There were three of them. Two carried the "stuff", the other carried a .375 H&H. I walked with them. Pete
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ... NRA Life Member |
January 10, 2013, 02:35 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: Lago Vista TX
Posts: 2,425
|
I would think the issue is a slow-moving bullet failing to penetrate ... No bears in my neighborhood but if I was going somewhere they might threaten, I'd have a bigbore revolver, maybe .357 up ...
__________________
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." Albert Camus |
January 10, 2013, 08:39 PM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 17, 2012
Posts: 106
|
Mike, the bear is certainly large and you are right there are BB's that are over 6'. An anomaly may even reach 7' as a genetic freak, but that bear was also fat. The picture itself can distort with the head up front and a person in the rear. The article even said it was fed by this woman for years. Food sources must be good in PA, as a number of bears of the close to 3000 taken each year are over 500 lbs.
|
January 10, 2013, 09:18 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2004
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 1,528
|
PA. Black Bears are not big because they are overweight or garbage dump bears. It's genetics and habitat. Vast isolated mountains cover the North central part of the state. The big ones are taken in the big mountains far away from towns and civilization. North Central Pa looks closer to Montana than what people would believe in the East coast. I know several +500lbs right around my home. Many hunting/Outdoor magazines do stories every year about the big bear taken in Lycoming and Clinton County.
This is a 879lbs Black bear. He barely fit end to end in a 8' pick-up box. Most all the world record Black bears come from north central Pa. Remember, these bears are field dressed in these pics. A nice 700lbs A 750lbs with a 23 9/16" skull This is a 650lbs Black Bear. They don't call it the Pine Creek Grand Canyon for nothing. In Clinton/Lycoming county. This is also why some of the most famous long distance wildcat cartridges were born here.
__________________
"I'm a good guy with a gun" What do I care if I give up some freedom or rights?....The Goverment will take care of me. This kind of thinking is now in the majority and it should concern you. "Ask not what you can do for your country, but what free entitlements you can bleed from your country" Last edited by Mystro; January 10, 2013 at 09:51 PM. |
January 11, 2013, 12:00 AM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2009
Location: nw wyoming
Posts: 1,061
|
Nice looking bears.
I just saw I screwed up on my bullet weights. I didnt test with a 135gr it was a 235gr TC. And with a heavy load it penatrated ALMOST the same in wet phonebooks as a 45 colt and a 315gr WFN and 24gr of 110. As for a WFN not feeding in a 45ACP, it would be trial and error. The Lee 200gr FN feeds great in everything we've tried it in and they dont come with a bigger meplat that I've seen, though 200gr is too light. It wouldnt be ideal, but I know a man in Alaska that has killed 2 bears with a 45 ACP and wont carry anything else because of quick recovery time. Last edited by reloader28; January 11, 2013 at 12:07 AM. |
January 11, 2013, 12:12 AM | #64 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Last edited by Josh17; January 11, 2013 at 12:24 AM. |
|
January 11, 2013, 01:07 AM | #65 | ||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Josh17
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In your own words: Quote:
Again I state: The question is, "Would a reasonable and prudent person expect to or seriously consider defending oneself against a bear with a .45 auto pistol; especially if other alternatives are available?" I personally know a fair number of Alaska Guides and not one of them carries a .45 ACP or a .22 for that matter for bear protection when out in the bush. While they "COULD", they "DON'T". Just because something is possible does not make it wise. YMMV
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
||||||||
January 11, 2013, 01:17 AM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
The OP never said anything about having other alternatives available. And I think that's an important aspect of this conversation. Not to put words in his mouth....(like the above post) But I think it's a question of going out with a 45acp, or not going out at all.
__________________
There are many things in life that are out of my control. Recoil isn't one of them. |
January 11, 2013, 01:23 AM | #67 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
I believe that if the OP can make it from Florida to where the "big northern bears" live to go fishing, he can probably afford at the minimum a can of bear spray. But if not, I will personally lend him one of mine if he ends up in my neck of the woods. Quote:
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
||
January 11, 2013, 01:27 AM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
He also never said anything about going to Alaska. From Florida, "going up north where the bears are big" can just as easily mean Maine.
__________________
There are many things in life that are out of my control. Recoil isn't one of them. |
January 11, 2013, 01:30 AM | #69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
And again, where did this, "or not at all" assumption come from?
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
|
January 11, 2013, 01:33 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
This is a gun forum, not a bear spray forum.
__________________
There are many things in life that are out of my control. Recoil isn't one of them. |
January 11, 2013, 01:36 AM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: Ct.
Posts: 546
|
A follow up post by the original poster would probably prevent a lot of this conjecture.
__________________
There are many things in life that are out of my control. Recoil isn't one of them. |
January 11, 2013, 04:24 AM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 196
|
Everyone here is making assumptions as stated above the OP never said where he was going.
I said a .22 had dropped a bear in one shot. That is a fact. I also said dont count on it. But it CAN happen. It's just rare. BUT it goes to show with proper shot placement even the "all mighty bear" can fall to a mere .22 caliber. So if a mere .22 can do that then surely a 45ACP that had much more power could, no? The .45LC had been around for a long time and has been used to take out many bears. Hell I remember a quote from a movie or a game "6 shots... Enough to kill anything that moves" (referring to .45LC). Yes, just a movie/game, but I do agree, 6 shots of 45 cal is enough to kill nearly anything. Nearly. I think 6 well placed shots vs a Grizzly would take it down. But will you be able to get 6 good shots? Unlikely. Get a 12 gauge and load it up with slugs then carry the .45 as a sidearm and your set! Or if you want to be really safe: a 12 gauge for main weapon, and .44 magnum for sidearm. Or even a .500 SW as sidearm. With a 12 gauge and a .500 SW I'd feel safe even in Alaska! I guess since the OP did say only one gun, then AZAK you are right. For a 45ACP as the only weapon vs large bears? no no no! A .45ACP isn't a good "only weapon" if he's up against big browns or Grizzly bears. It still *CAN* work but bringing it as your *ONLY* gun is a bad idea. If you had a 12 gauge, and a 45ACP pistol as a side-arm you'd be fine. Now if a 45ACP is still all you had for whatever reason it is 100 times better then having nothing at all. Much better. Still I wouldn't feel safe with it as the only weapon in large bear county. If in small bear county I'd feel okay with just a 45ACP but not vs large bear. 12 gauge with slugs would be your best bet. If you ONLY want to carry a handgun then get a .44 magnum or .500SW. It's much better than a 45ACP. Still not good as your only gun in big bear county but they are much better choice. Last edited by Josh17; January 11, 2013 at 04:34 AM. |
January 11, 2013, 04:32 AM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
I simply leave my opinion based upon:
literally many thousands of days in big bear country hiking (I realistically get out 350 days a year for hours a day, and also extended trips out into the bush), hunting, fishing, boating, tracking in bear country obtained over decades, knowing and having read Larry Kaniut's books (many of which document first hand bear/man encounters obtained over decades), knowing a number of professional guides including what they do and don't do again over decades, reading research on bears and bear encounters, knowing wildlife biologists, specifically tracking and watching bears, the fact that I have had close bear encounters over the years (four feet being the closest non-hunting encounter) etc... I could go on... Basically I have come to "feel safe" with my personal choices regarding my behavior in bear country and my approaches to bear defense. And they are not similar to Timothy Treadwell's or a .45 ACP. I am not the bear whisperer and know others with far more bear experience than myself; and many others whom I do not know, but are out there. Realistically, we are all more likely to die of heart disease, or in an automobile than be attacked by a bear. I think that the very 1st response to the OP was very insightful. I respect everyone's right to their own experiences and opinions; I may or may not agree with them. YMMV
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
January 11, 2013, 06:32 AM | #74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 196
|
Wow, that is quite a bit of experience I must say. Pretty damned lot to be honest. I don't have that experience or have read those books so you definitely do have a lot of knowledge and personal experience to bring to the table. I honestly wish I could spent that much time outdoors.
I do see that we both agree a 12 gauge is the best option Not sure where the OP went lol. But I think he got his answer. |
January 11, 2013, 08:05 AM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Posts: 225
|
Quote:
That said, you're right. The OP has been answered. Most would not feel safe with .45acp as bear defense if it were really needed. You're bringing up a lot of "lots of bears killed with .45's" and then the above quote about the .22....No offense, and I've enjoyed this thread, but I'm guessing you've never dealt with real-life bears or the business of killing them. A small bear bent on killing you will not go down easily. If I had a .45 in my hand at the point a 65 pound bear was charging me, I would expect to be severely hurt. I've shot 3 of my bears with my 30-06. None of them dropped in their tracks, despite heavy bone damage and heart/lung hits. Same goes for 50 cal muzzleloader. They are tough animals. Maybe I need that .22 of which you speak..... |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|