The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 11, 2017, 08:05 AM   #1
Jeryray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2016
Location: NY Area
Posts: 310
Purchased new Sig Super match .45

Nice and very accurate.
Just wish it had the standard de-cocker.

I have had the magazine not latch in properly.

When I use 185 SWC at 4.5 g Bullseye, dos not cycle.

Working with springs.

But still feels good with 230 round nose loads.
Jeryray is offline  
Old March 15, 2017, 11:50 PM   #2
Jeryray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2016
Location: NY Area
Posts: 310
OK, settled on 230g 4.1 bullseye.

Very accurate groups at 50 feet.

Purchased a caliber change kit from sig, also a .45 caliber and and having a delta point pro installed.

This way I can change Slides in a few seconds and have optical or fixed sights.
I would love it more if it were like my 226..
Jeryray is offline  
Old March 16, 2017, 05:25 PM   #3
rt11002003
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2014
Posts: 524
Good idea having both type sights readily available. I've recently been shooting Freedom 220 gr in a new STI 2011 Edge, with good results.
rt11002003 is offline  
Old March 16, 2017, 05:57 PM   #4
Rinspeed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2000
Posts: 1,505
Rinspeed is offline  
Old March 16, 2017, 07:07 PM   #5
Walt Sherrill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 1999
Location: Winston-Salem, NC USA
Posts: 6,348
If you wanted a decocker, you should've gotten the Match rather than the Super Match. The Super Match is SAO, and they don't have a decocker option.

I've had both models and they're fine-shooting .45s. My Super Match, when it locked back after the last shot, required the use of both hands to release the slide: one on the lever and the other working the slide. Mine was an early one, and many of them were apparently over-sprung (recoil springs) from the factory. Had I kept it, I probably would have cut a coil off the recoil spring, as SIG claimed there wasn't a lighter one available from them.
Walt Sherrill is offline  
Old March 18, 2017, 12:39 AM   #6
Jeryray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2016
Location: NY Area
Posts: 310
Yes, I agree, it's a tough slide to move. Would have been fine 30-40 years ago.
It does help once the optics are mounted, I know I should not use them to move the slide, just gives me a better grip.

Also I don't know if the both match models are 5"
Jeryray is offline  
Old March 18, 2017, 07:54 AM   #7
Walt Sherrill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 1999
Location: Winston-Salem, NC USA
Posts: 6,348
Quote:
Also I don't know if the both match models are 5"
They both are 5". The Fjestad Blue Book shows them both under the MATCH listing, noting that the Super Match is SAO and comes with gorgeous custom shop wood grips! But you should know about the grips.

The only thing that might be significantly different is the P220 X-Five, very rare here in the U.S. -- I've only seen photos on the 'net -- and I'd hate to find out what one of them costs...

The Blue Book says that the Elite Match became standard during 2010.

Last edited by Walt Sherrill; March 18, 2017 at 08:06 AM.
Walt Sherrill is offline  
Old March 18, 2017, 08:10 AM   #8
saleen322
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2010
Posts: 778
WST and AA5 consistently perform the best in mine and they cycle very reliably. Will shoot groups @ 25 yards under 2" all day long.

saleen322 is offline  
Old March 19, 2017, 12:14 AM   #9
Jeryray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2016
Location: NY Area
Posts: 310
Where did you get the 185 SWC?

I re-load Dillon press.

Tried Berrys 185 SWC 4.1 - 4.5 Bullseye. They would not feed properly.
Jeryray is offline  
Old March 19, 2017, 03:08 PM   #10
saleen322
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2010
Posts: 778
I usually shoot Penn Bullets and that is what I used there. If you want to shoot jacketed, the 185 HP from Nosler is the one to go with. The Penn 200 SWC is maybe even a touch better than the 185. I never had any good luck with Berrys when it comes to accuracy. I tried them in both 9mm and 45, they shot okay at best for me.

saleen322 is offline  
Old March 19, 2017, 11:17 PM   #11
Jeryray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2016
Location: NY Area
Posts: 310
Ok, thanks.

Was that group bench rest, bullseye, combat grip?
Jeryray is offline  
Old March 20, 2017, 04:55 AM   #12
saleen322
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2010
Posts: 778
I do ammo accuracy testing from a rest. The objective is to eliminate as many variables as you can to see what the ammo is doing. The gun, the ammo and the shooter all have error. If you don't reduce some of the error, you will not get the best end result.
saleen322 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06924 seconds with 8 queries