|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 4, 2012, 09:54 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
Quote:
I do not load on a progressive, so it did not occur to me that all of the operations were going on simultaneously... Would the short stroke not have affected all other operations also? May he have a cartridge with an under resized case (loose neck), one with a short charge, and one with a soft crimp also then? ADDING: Never mind...I just reread where his setup primes on the down stroke... |
|
August 4, 2012, 09:58 PM | #27 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Primes on downstroke and the Turret is not a progressive. One case at a time, one operation per pull, 3 or 4 pulls per completed round. Must faster than a single, slower than a progressive.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
August 4, 2012, 10:03 PM | #28 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
I know nothing about a turret or progressive myself. Started with a RCBS Rockchucker and still load on same. That's been about 16 years ago and wouldn't chane a thing.
|
August 4, 2012, 10:14 PM | #29 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
If you tried a Classic Turret you might.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
August 4, 2012, 10:17 PM | #30 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Maybe so but don't care to change.
|
August 4, 2012, 10:28 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
I know nothing about a turret or progressive myself. Started with a RCBS Rockchucker and still load on same. That's been about 16 years ago and wouldn't chane a thing.
Heck...I'm still using the only press I have ever owned/used, and that's a long time... It's a Lee Hand Press... |
August 4, 2012, 10:36 PM | #32 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Some people you can sell all the new fangled things too or the latest and greatest others love a certain brand/type and loyal to that. Me, if you cut me with a knife I'll bleed Green! I want to know what the Op did or is going to do with this round???? Update us please.
|
August 4, 2012, 10:39 PM | #33 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
The OP updated us in post #15 and reminded us in post #21.
|
August 4, 2012, 10:49 PM | #34 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Thanks
|
August 4, 2012, 11:02 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
|
Since some posters seem to think that a healthy respect for primers is akin to paranoia, let me relate some experience that I acquired while much younger, in a society that tolerated such foolishness:
I happened to have some Remington .44-40 smokeless powder loads that I had decided I did NOT want to shoot in a very old 1873 Winchester (made in 1884, I think). So, to me, those cartridges were useless and surplus. This was in the days when cherry bombs were legal and plentiful, so loud explosions did not bring the police unless you actually blew-up something that belonged to somebody else. So, a few of us decided to see what would happen if we taped a thumb tack to the bottom of a cartridge with the point against the primer and dropped it off a bridge onto a concrete pad. With a little tape "tail" on the bullet's nose to make the cartridge fall stably with the primer down, we found out that those rounds went off with a bang that made cherry bombs come in a close second. Of course, we were careful to avoid exposure to the brass shrapnel. Pieces of the case and the bullets were hard to find on a pad that was the width of 2 road lanes. (They were the old balloon head cases, so there was not much mass in the case heads for these particular cartridges, and we never found even an intact case head.) So, the moral of this story is that IF a primer goes off in a loaded cartridge that is not confined in any way, it very well may EXPLODE rather than simply poof the bullet out of the case. And, sometimes a primer DOES go off while being seated. It only happens rarely. But, it happens while seating a primer in a loaded cartridge, see "bang" above. So, while people can and do get away unscathed while doing dangerous things, that does NOT indicate that those things were safe to do. Ok, now the information is out there, and each of you can make an INFORMED choice about how YOU will handle YOUR OWN little problems as they come up. SL1 |
August 4, 2012, 11:26 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
|
Quote:
|
|
August 4, 2012, 11:52 PM | #37 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's a single stage type shell holder. How do you get powder and bullet on top of a high primer single stage? A turret press and only loading one at a time with no inspection between steps?
One of the reason I like to batch load. Starting with primed brass has more going for it than I had previously realized. I've only been doing it because it makes my loading op flow smoother. |
August 5, 2012, 01:15 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2009
Location: East Houston
Posts: 257
|
I have several kinetic pullers and prefer those but I wondered how my collet type puller would work on that? The bullet looked pretty tapered and the collet may not grip it. The round is already in the shell holder and it might work. I have the Hornady Cam Loc and a full set of collets so it would be worth a try.
I draw the line at reseating the primer on a loaded round. I'd destroy the round before I'd risk injury over 25 cents. Flash |
August 5, 2012, 01:39 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 2011
Posts: 1,755
|
For clarification, it's possible because the classic turret primes on the down stroke of the decap/size operation. Priming itself on the classic turret requires more of a down stroke than is required for the rest of the operations. There's not much feedback on the priming portion, and I'm a noob so I had only been checking the primer seating after the rounds were completed.
But thanks to this incident, I've added another step. Check the primers! |
August 5, 2012, 01:41 AM | #40 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
That's the main thing is an experience to learn from.
|
August 5, 2012, 02:23 AM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2007
Location: Upper Indiana
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
I now know why I use a hand primer while watching TV. No problems with partially seated primers. I have dedicated hand primer tools, Lee old style with the screw in shell holders, for the very few calibers I do not have the old Lee's for I use a Hornady hand primer. Been doing it this way for over 50 years, but I have up graded with new technology when it fits my needs. |
|
August 5, 2012, 05:54 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,166
|
The easiest way is to:
a. Put the shellholder with cartridge back into the press. b. Remove the die. c. Raise the ram until the bullet itself comes through the top. d. With a pair of vise grips or channel locks (yes, you're going to ruin the bullet) clamp onto the bullet HARD, and lower the ram. The bullet will separate. e. Empty the powder, reseat the primer and continue. Another option is to purchase an RCBS Collet Bullet puller. These work in the same way as described above, but won't damage the bullet that much. Finally, learn from the experience. Good luck!
__________________
Hiding in plain sight... |
August 5, 2012, 10:24 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
Powderman is absolutely correct. It's quick and safe to do it that way (and smart).
|
August 5, 2012, 10:53 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2011
Location: Trinity, Texas
Posts: 636
|
Hats off to JibJab and Powderman.
Common sense prevails.
__________________
David Bachelder Trinity, Texas I load, 9mm Luger, 38 and 40 S&W, 38 Special, 357Magnum, 45ACP, 45 Colt, 223, 300 AAC, 243 and 30-06 |
August 5, 2012, 11:52 AM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 3,341
|
Quote:
But a turret press can process in continuous mode as easily as in batch mode. In batch mode, you are correct, the OP would not have gone past the priming step. In continuous mode, the case is processed all the way through all steps before (attempting) removal of the finished cartridge from the press. Here is how it can work like that. The turret press operating in continuous mode: Insert empty case in the press Size/deprime on the upstroke prime on the downstroke Rotate the turret head to the next die station Bell the case mouth and charge the case (through the powder-through die) rotate the turret head to the next die station place a bullet on the case mouth Seat the bullet on the upstroke rotate the turret head to the next die station Crimp the case Remove the finished cartridge (unless the primer is not seated properly). rotate the turret head to the next die station (Station #1) Repeat While the continuous mode processing does not prevent individual case inspection between steps it does strongly tend to discourage it in favor of batch inspection at other points in the process (where the batch mode processing makes only a little preference). Lost Sheep Last edited by Lost Sheep; August 5, 2012 at 11:58 AM. |
|
August 5, 2012, 11:52 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2010
Posts: 498
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|