November 24, 2008, 04:10 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2008
Posts: 1,304
|
SBR, why?
Why do people jump through all the hoops to make a rifle shorter and less accurate? I could see a short barrel shotgun but why rifle? I have always been curious. Thanks
|
November 24, 2008, 04:11 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2008
Posts: 730
|
Not less accurate, just shorter. And the purpose is to make a more effective CQB weapon (clearing buildings, deploying the weapon from a vehicle, etc).
Also, a semi-auto copy of most submachineguns usually has to be SBR'd, otherwise the barrel looks absurdly long on an otherwise compact weapon. |
November 24, 2008, 04:14 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2008
Posts: 1,304
|
Quote:
|
|
November 24, 2008, 04:16 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2008
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
|
|
November 24, 2008, 04:53 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 1999
Location: South Sioux City, Nebraska
Posts: 704
|
it makes a glock more accurate.
|
November 24, 2008, 05:00 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2008
Posts: 1,304
|
Quote:
|
|
November 24, 2008, 05:59 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 156
|
My 9.25" AR-15 + 4" suppressor is the most effective close quarters weapon I could conceive. Clearing my house is quick and easy. I carried it all day during the aftermath of Hurricane Gustav (I live in the worst hit, highest crime area of Louisiana and didn't have power for 3 weeks) and could perform everyday tasks with ease.
By contrast, my old home defense gun (5 shot 18" Mossberg 500) feels clumsy and archaic. Accuracy? At 25 yards with a 1x Trijicon Reflex the .223 holes are touching each other. The suppressor makes it absolutely hearing safe indoors. |
November 25, 2008, 02:52 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
that's what i'm talking about, get some. |
|
November 25, 2008, 03:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 933
|
Because they are Tactikool. Really, my reason was because of the length of the suppressor and it's a 9mm rifle.
|
November 25, 2008, 03:36 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2007
Location: The South
Posts: 1,084
|
I bought one (11.5") because I can, and so it's not ultra long when I screw a can onto the end of it.
Oh, and they're badass too.
__________________
"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders"-Uncle Ted |
November 25, 2008, 03:51 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
|
because it makes a 6920 look so much cooler...
Last edited by cat9x; November 25, 2008 at 03:59 PM. |
November 25, 2008, 04:50 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
What about a 22lr? What advantage is there in having more than a 10-12" barrel? Pretty much none. Plus as mentioned, you put a 6 inch can on a 12 inch 223 and you have 18 inches.
Last edited by johnwilliamson062; November 25, 2008 at 05:03 PM. |
November 25, 2008, 06:39 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 442
|
If I didn't SBR my PS90, it looked dumb. Also, I love my 10/22 with 5.5" barrel.
The real reason, though? I can't just register them as MGs or I would. That'd take care of the SBR/SBS aspect as well. |
November 25, 2008, 09:30 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2007
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 844
|
Looking dumb
I came into a Norinco Uzi cheap, but the wood stock looks like garbage. To play the 922R game and add enough US parts to "allow" me to put on a $15 folding stock would cost $180 bucks for the US made parts. To make an SBR on a Form 1 only $20 bucks more and it looks like an Uzi is supposed to. Whose idea was this?
|
November 26, 2008, 12:41 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 2006
Location: NEO
Posts: 202
|
Just because....
|
November 26, 2008, 04:22 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 6, 2008
Posts: 496
|
BoonDoggie
those are some badass lookin rifles man!
|
|
|