The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 4, 2018, 07:17 PM   #1
Longhorn1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2016
Location: Fort Bend County, Texas
Posts: 173
Did I miss something?

I am watching Guns and Ammo TV and they are going on about the "stout" recoil of 9mm +p. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!?! It was only a few years back that .357 mag & .45 ACP were the standard defensive rounds. I'm not disparaging the 9mm by any means, but has it gotten so to the point where even the nine is too much for the average shooter to handle these days?? I know I'm a dinosaur. Among my EDCs is a 2 1/4 inch Model 60 loaded with 125 gr .357. I've been shooting it for 20+ years and am comfortable with it. At this rate, in another generation, Red Rider BB guns will come with a muzzle brake!!!

Sorry to rant, but good grief! It's a real live firearm! It's supposed to recoil, unlike the ones in video games!
Longhorn1986 is offline  
Old July 4, 2018, 08:23 PM   #2
indie_rocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 189
I mean... A compact or sub-compact 9 with +p ammo definitely has a little bite. But nothing compared to my S&W 642 with +p or 2.25" Ruger SP101 with full .357 mag ammo.

But a full sized 9mm is about the most pleasant shooting pistol one can get for the performance.
indie_rocker is offline  
Old July 4, 2018, 10:01 PM   #3
Andy Blozinski
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2013
Posts: 525
The concealment market is booming and encouraging tiny designs. I got my daughter a Sig P938 and that tiny thing with a hot 9mm has some snap.
Andy Blozinski is offline  
Old July 5, 2018, 12:03 AM   #4
jmhyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2012
Location: MS - USA
Posts: 899
Most of what I hear and read about recoil lately seems to be in the context of faster follow-up shots. So when they talk about 9 mm +P rounds being "snappy" or "stout", they probably don't mean to imply that these rounds are uncomfortable to shoot. They are just more difficult (or take more practice) to get back on target quickly.
jmhyer is offline  
Old July 5, 2018, 05:55 AM   #5
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
The better 9mm +P loads will push a 124 gr bullet out the muzzle at 1300 fps from a 5" barrel, 1200-1250 from 4" barrels. While 357 mag advertises about 1500 fps, real world speeds are usually closer to 1200-1300 fps, often slower.

Your 2 1/4" barrel probably isn't making 1100 fps with most common loads. You might be making 1200-1300 fps with some of the hotter loads.

A 124 gr bullet leaving a lightweight plastic framed compact pistol at 1200 fps is going to have similar recoil to a mid sized, steel framed 357 mag. Maybe more.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 07:20 AM   #6
Don P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
9 mm +P is just parting good folks and their money. Nice gimmick to sell ammo. I doubt anyone can tell the difference being shot with standard 9 mm or 9 mm +P, or 9 mm+P+
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer,
ICORE Range Officer,
,MAG 40 Graduate
As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be.
Don P is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 09:50 AM   #7
Wag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 986
Last time I shot an LCP with standard ball ammo, it was a real kicker. Not real pleasant to shoot and it took quite a bit of practice time to get me to keep it on target. Very short range pistol, too.

Same ammo in the 92 was a breeze to shoot.

Ergo, it's not the ammo, it's the pistol and shooter.

--Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.
Wag is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 02:47 PM   #8
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,786
I'm a little confused by the same ammo being used in an LCP and a Beretta 92, Wag.

But to the original point, there are some odd opinions out there these days, mostly arising from a lack of real or broad experience.
TailGator is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 05:29 PM   #9
MTT TL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
357 Magnum and 9mm+P are pretty much the same thing out of a 4" barrel.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war.
MTT TL is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 05:42 PM   #10
Ruga Booga
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2017
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTT TL View Post
357 Magnum and 9mm+P are pretty much the same thing out of a 4" barrel.
??
Ruga Booga is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 06:03 PM   #11
MTT TL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
Buffalo Bore 9mm +P will get 1300-1500 fps which is pretty much the same thing.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war.
MTT TL is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 08:11 PM   #12
Ruga Booga
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2017
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTT TL View Post
Buffalo Bore 9mm +P will get 1300-1500 fps which is pretty much the same thing.
That is +P+
Ruga Booga is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 08:22 PM   #13
MoArk Willy
Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2018
Posts: 93
Many EDC guns weigh less than half of what the average gun did 15 years ago. Snappy is more than relative...it's a reality. That's why the defense loads are so popular. Scaled back loads that are easier to handle. But the worst thing about the light carry guns is that they become uncomfortable to practice with for any length of time.
A bad scenario when it hurts to practice with a weapon that just may have to save your life.
MoArk Willy is offline  
Old July 6, 2018, 10:33 PM   #14
AL45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2012
Posts: 753
I had a Ruger SP101 .357 magnum 2.5" and when firing Hornady 125 grain XTP factory loads at 1500 FPS, it stung a little. I find my Ruger 7.5" Redhawk .45 Colt firing 325 grain cast lead at 1200 FPS more pleasant. It depends on the gun and the grip.
AL45 is offline  
Old July 7, 2018, 10:40 AM   #15
Wag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 986
Quote:
Originally Posted by TailGator View Post
I'm a little confused by the same ammo being used in an LCP and a Beretta 92, Wag.

But to the original point, there are some odd opinions out there these days, mostly arising from a lack of real or broad experience.
My mistake. LC9.

--Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.
Wag is offline  
Old July 9, 2018, 10:50 AM   #16
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,511
I always think of recoil in the context of follow-up shots, so it's the character of the recoil, as well as the amount that interests me.
I generally prefer "snappy", as that allows the gun to get back on target quicker; "soft is slow".

I'd shot some fairly stout .45 ACP rounds (230gr at 880fps) through a revolver a couple of weekends in a row, and upon returning to a competition load (230 at 740) in a 1911, was surprised by the relative lack of felt recoil, which I'm sure was due to both the reduced load, and the recoil characteristics of auto vs. revolver.

Last year, I shot mostly a compact, 16oz 9mm, 1000+ rounds, and while I'd read some reports on the net of the gun "nearly jumping from my hand" in recoil, it seems docile to me.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong.
RickB is offline  
Old July 9, 2018, 12:30 PM   #17
rock185
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2001
Location: Out West in Rim Country
Posts: 1,088
"Stout recoil" and 9MM, don't seem to belong in the same sentence. I was issued 9MM +P for years, and have shot a fair amount of 9MM +p, and +P+, in a variety of pistols and revolvers. Recoil is greater than any +P 38 Spcl. I've used. But "stout", not so much IMHO. The hottest 9MM +P+ I've chronographed has less recoil than common, standard pressure, .45 ACP 230 grain ball....


OK, I take it back, sorta. Years ago, I shot a magazine of 9MM +P in a little Detonics "Pocket 9", with unlocked, blow back, action. Nasty!
__________________
COTEP 640, NRA Life

Last edited by rock185; July 9, 2018 at 12:36 PM.
rock185 is offline  
Old July 9, 2018, 12:43 PM   #18
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
The 357 Magnum has quite a performance improvement over the 9mm, even +P versions.

Here are a few actual chronographed speeds,

357 magnum

Remington 125 SJHP.
4” 686 = 1465 fps
2” Colt Magnum Carry = 1255 fps


Buffalo Bore 125 GDHP
4” 686 = 1510 fps
2” Colt Magnum Carry = 1328 fps
2.5” S&W M66 = 1339 fps



9mm Luger

Double Tap 115 +P
4” Glock = 1305 fps

Double Tap 124 +P
4” Glock = 1257 fps

Double Tap 124 +P
4” Glock = 1117 fps

Winchester 127 +P+
4.5” CZ SP-01 4.5” = 1205 fps

Federal HST +P
Walther P99 4” = 1208 fps

Remington 124 GS +P
3.6” S&W M&P = 1138 fps

Federal 115 9BPLE +P+
3.6” S&W M&P = 1285 fps
74A95 is offline  
Old July 9, 2018, 03:55 PM   #19
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,511
If you drove the bullets another 100 or 200fps faster, would you consider that an improvement?

I don't think you get a proportional improvement in results, when you start down the road of improved external ballistics.

I wouldn't trade the docile handling of standard pressure loads for +P, so driving the bullets even faster via a different vehicle wouldn't be very appealing, either.

It's like hunting with a .308, or a .30-06, or a .300 Winchester Magnum; maybe just going to a .32" bullet makes more sense than adding more velocity?
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong.
RickB is offline  
Old July 9, 2018, 05:06 PM   #20
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,966
Wag- the LCP and LC 9 use different cartridges.....
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old July 10, 2018, 03:26 PM   #21
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,786
Mr. DeShivs, Wag originally said something about using the same ammo in an LCP and a Beretta 92. I asked him about that, and when he replied about the LC9 I took it to mean that he meant to say LC9 instead of LCP in the original statement about using the same ammo as the 92.
TailGator is offline  
Old July 10, 2018, 05:26 PM   #22
Nathan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,285
I hear what you are saying! In my youth, I carried a s&w 640 357 mag with 158 jhp’s in it. I could draw and shoot fast, I thought.

Now, I shoot 9, 40 & 45. The timer tell no lies. In the same size/weight, I’m much faster with the 9!

My point is too much recoil is no longer just an ouch think. It is about split times. I’d bet +p ammo hurts split times.

My hardest kicking gun is a 3” s&w 547 with smooth wood grips. Man that kicks!
Nathan is offline  
Old July 12, 2018, 08:15 PM   #23
Wag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 986
Yes, this.

--Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.
Wag is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09122 seconds with 8 queries