The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 26, 2019, 10:46 AM   #1
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Do Test Groups' MOA Size Change With Range?

If the 100 yard 10 shot group is 1 MOA, will groups at greater ranges be the same?
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 10:51 AM   #2
LineStretcher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
Yes, 1 MOA is approx. 1" at 100 yards and therefore 1 MOA at 200 yards is approx. 2". It's the old angle of the dangle thing.. LOL..
LineStretcher is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 10:57 AM   #3
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
NO

Quote:
If the 100 yard 10 shot group is 1 MOA, will groups at greater ranges be the same?
General rule, is; Likely not to NO or at least don't expect it. There are just too many variables. I have ever seen bullets, in flight and wonder how I get the good groups, I do …

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 12:21 PM   #4
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
They certainly can. Will they in your rifle with this ammo or that ammo? Maybe, maybe not. You have to test it before you can know.
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 12:24 PM   #5
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"If the 100 yard 10 shot group is 1 MOA, will groups at greater ranges be the same?"
Maybe or NOT. The longer distances may challenge sighting capabilities(optic magnification, visual acuity) or increase environmental issues.
Mobuck is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 12:27 PM   #6
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by LineStretcher View Post
Yes, 1 MOA is approx. 1" at 100 yards and therefore 1 MOA at 200 yards is approx. 2". It's the old angle of the dangle thing.. LOL..
Exact trig value below was calculated to 102 decimal places for those wanting more precision:

1.04719753642832854694747069666400334739860873986429
830552235157457471965151538005004775737357536725837... inches at 100 yards.

Exactly one inch is good enough for the National Shooting Sports Foundation.
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 12:41 PM   #7
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
In general usage, MOA is one inch per hundred yards. 1" at 100, 2" at 200, 10" at 1,000 yds.

A 1" group is MOA at 100yds, but 1/2" MOA at 200 yards.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 02:47 PM   #8
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
I know Bart cites "compensation" which works when barrel vibrations are just right to launch a low velocity bullet at a higher angle than a high velocity bullet, letting them both land close together at extended range, therefore a source of the converging bullet phenomenon. The Brits knew about that when they still shot the .303 at targets. Seems to me this would also mean that they were farther apart at midrange than the base group or the final group.

But I think more of us would experience the "trumpet effect" where other variables cause groups to widen more than the short range angular.
A pistol shooter opined that 25 yard groups do not scale up to 50 yards where the NRA shoots, that a 2.4X factor was closer to observations.

Last edited by Jim Watson; May 26, 2019 at 03:41 PM.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 03:20 PM   #9
LineStretcher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
Holy Carp Batman, talk about over thinking something... LOL..
LineStretcher is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 03:42 PM   #10
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
Not if you are a serious target shooter like Bart.
Or have an idle Sunday like me.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 03:53 PM   #11
RC20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
Calm conditions or with Wind and is it varying?
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not
RC20 is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 04:11 PM   #12
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by RC20 View Post
Calm conditions or with Wind and is it varying?
Calm conditions but a 30 fps spread in muzzle velocity.
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 04:53 PM   #13
old roper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
You can shoot small group in practice but what counts is at match. Ask Bart he should know. Tell everyone how it felt to shoot next to last in biggest match as team member and that in the books. You couldn't pull off what your posting about.
__________________
Semper Fi
Vietnam 1965
VFW Life member
NRA Life Member
old roper is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 05:07 PM   #14
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by old roper View Post
You can shoot small group in practice but what counts is at match. Ask Bart he should know. Tell everyone how it felt to shoot next to last in biggest match as team member and that in the books. You couldn't pull off what your posting about.
It felt good calling every shot center using wind corrections from the coach during the worst wind conditions ever shot in the match. We used between 20 and 35 MOA sight settings from windage zero. My job was to fire each shot aimed at bullseye center, I did that.

All of which is beyond comprehension by n'er-do-wells who don't grasp the subject posted. Someone always shoots the low scores in team matches and such has nothing to do with exterior and interior ballistic variables' effects on bullet trajectories.

Last edited by Bart B.; May 26, 2019 at 06:01 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 07:13 PM   #15
Picher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,694
Contrary to popular belief, bullets don't travel in a perfectly straight line, but in a spiral, due to imperfections and precession, like a top tends to travel in a spiral.

This precession has been plotted by installing perfectly-aligned targets out to several hundred yards, then shooting at the closest one and measuring where that bullet (or several bullets) impact subsequent targets, (accounting for drop).

Bullets also tend to "go to sleep" at some point in flight and the precession decreases.

A bullet's spiral is not huge and better bullets travel in tighter spirals than poor bullets or those that have impacted twigs, etc.

You can choose not to believe this and I won't be angry (but it's true).
Picher is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 08:28 PM   #16
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Picher View Post
Contrary to popular belief, bullets don't travel in a perfectly straight line, but in a spiral, due to imperfections and precession, like a top tends to travel in a spiral.
What is the spiral sizes in MOA at 100, 200 and 300 yards with the best, most uniform bullets?
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 09:08 PM   #17
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,827
MOA increases with flight time, or range. The culprit is gravity.

When stating group size in MOA, it is generally assumed range of 100yd, or specified otherwise. That's what I do.

-TL

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 09:11 PM   #18
ernie8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2018
Posts: 217
Picher is right on , bullets do not travel in a liner path . They are rotating around the straight path , that is why groups are round . There are many factors that will change the figures and ranges some what , but a good rule of thumb is 1 at 100 , 2.8 at 200 and 4.5 at 300 yards . After that the bullet does start to settle and the group sizes will start to get smaller percentage wise . There are many factors that will move the scale up or down . National bench rest champion shooters shoot 2.8x larger at 200 yards that 100 . If you do not then there is something wrong with your 100 yard load or you should be teaching the champs how to do it .
ernie8 is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 10:05 PM   #19
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernie8 View Post
Picher is right on , bullets do not travel in a liner path . They are rotating around the straight path , that is why groups are round.
If you shoot a couple hundred shots in a group, will most be in the outer third of its diameter?
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 26, 2019, 11:02 PM   #20
Colorado Redneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2008
Location: Northeast Colorado
Posts: 1,993
The outer third comprises about 55percent of the area of a circle. Assuming random dispersion, then yes. My limited observations are, however, that in a larger number of shots, most are clustered closer to the center of the group.

Last edited by Colorado Redneck; May 26, 2019 at 11:11 PM.
Colorado Redneck is offline  
Old May 27, 2019, 09:07 AM   #21
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Redneck View Post
The outer third comprises about 55percent of the area of a circle. Assuming random dispersion, then yes. My limited observations are, however, that in a larger number of shots, most are clustered closer to the center of the group.
My data from analyzing such groups is...

40% of the shots are inside the inner 40% of group diameter. 30% in the next 30%, same for next 20% and 10%. Tracks well with statistical distribution curves.

Why are tuners used at the muzzle on some rifles? What do they change?

Last edited by Bart B.; May 27, 2019 at 10:14 AM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 27, 2019, 12:45 PM   #22
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
A 10 shot group being 1 MOA is kind of miraculous by itself. However, if the question is will the same ammo and rifle produce 1" at 200 or 300 yards, then no.
"...and precession..." That's normally called pitching and yawing. The base of the bullet literally wobbles until the rifling twist takes effect and the bullet stabilizes. That's at around 300 yards for a .30 calibre.
Arrows do the same thing. You can see an arrow stabilize when the fletching kicks in. It's like a switch was thrown. The arrow's back end stops wobbling and starts flying true.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old May 27, 2019, 02:10 PM   #23
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,992
The longer the bullet is out of the bore, the more opportunity things like wind and gravity have to change the path of the bullet. Therefore, with sufficient sample sizes, (i.e. enough groups shot and compared) the MOA measurement of groups at longer ranges should be larger than groups shot at shorter ranges under identical conditions. Maybe not a lot bigger, but some.

There are some circumstances under which a rifle might, under nearly ideal conditions, make groups that are about the same, measured in MOA at one particular farther range, but that's sort of a pathological case. Still interesting to consider.
Quote:
Exactly one inch is good enough for the National Shooting Sports Foundation.
https://www.nssf.org/shooting/minute-angle-moa/
"A MOA is 1/60th of a degree.

1 MOA spreads about 1″ per 100 yards. (actually 1.047″)"
Approximating 1MOA as 1" results in an approximation error of about 5%. Not a big error. For reference, here are some other approximations that are about the same in magnitude:
  • Using 3 instead of the correct value for pi.
  • Approximating 100 yards as 95.5 yards.
  • Approximating a minute of angle as being 1/63rd of a degree instead of 1/60th of a degree.
In practice, a 5% approximation error is not a big deal given that there's probably around that much error in the actual group size measurements before one starts calculating the MOA values. And, of course, if everyone is using the same approximation by standard, then it's not an issue at all.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old May 27, 2019, 03:14 PM   #24
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. O'Heir View Post
The base of the bullet literally wobbles until the rifling twist takes effect and the bullet stabilizes. That's at around 300 yards for a .30 calibre.
Then why do the best 30 caliber match bullets test .20 MOA at 100 yards, .25 MOA at 200 or .30 MOA at 300? I've seen 30 caliber match bullet test groups shot at Sierra's 100 yard range in California averaging 1/10th inch.

Benchrest aggregate group average records expand about the same from 100 to 300 yards. Their single 5 and 10 shot group records are smaller.

Last edited by Bart B.; May 27, 2019 at 03:26 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 27, 2019, 06:43 PM   #25
ernie8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2018
Posts: 217
Bench rest reported groups are factored from 100 to 200 yards , that is not the actual 200 yard measure . If you are shooting .10 groups with a factory mass produced bullet , .30 cal yet , you should go and win some side bets at a bench rest match . I am just glad all the super shooters do not shoot in matches , or I would be in trouble . Kind of like when I was running a pro class drag car in NHRA , people who built their motors with parts from Auto Zone told me how they were making more hp than my factory backed motors were . All my time wasted with blocks not even released to the public , flowed heads and handmade sheet metal intakes made to match , custom turned cam ,750 cfm carbs flowed to 1180 . In case there are any racers here , 314 sb chevy , 7.82 at 178.4 best at 11,500 rpm shift and a 7500 launch .
ernie8 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11316 seconds with 11 queries