The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 16, 2019, 04:30 PM   #26
dgludwig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2005
Location: North central Ohio
Posts: 7,486
I've had a Model 640-1 since I bought it new in 1996. Like my other J-frame, I put Herret "Shooting Ace" stocks on it. The revolver resides in my wife's dresser drawer in our bedroom and the hammerless frame keeps it from snagging various items of clothing should the occasion happen when it needs to be used for self-defense.
This J-frame variant is on the heavy side for concealed carry but if you ever plan to shoot much .357 Magnum ammunition, you will welcome the extra ounces.
__________________
ONLY AN ARMED PEOPLE CAN BE TRULY FREE ; ONLY AN UNARMED PEOPLE CAN EVER BE ENSLAVED
...Aristotle
NRA Benefactor Life Member
dgludwig is offline  
Old February 6, 2019, 12:47 AM   #27
Eddietruett
Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2017
Posts: 54
I'm a die hard S&W fan down to the core. I also hate hammerless revolvers. With that being said, I tried a Kimber KS6 and fell in love. While I still prefer a hammer and will own one of the new Kimbers when they hit the street, the KS6 has a trigger design that makes it possible to almost shoot it SA if you want. It is also very accurate and the little extra weight over a J frame makes it a whole lot easier to handle. I carry +P 38's in mine for defense because I see no need for full bore .357 but it would not be hard to handle with .357 loads. I did change the original boot grips for the slightly larger Kimber grips and being able to get that extra finger on the grip makes a world of difference as well. The only negative I can see with the Kimber is the same one I find with all 2 and 2.5" S&W's that the short ejector rod won't fully kick out empties as well as a 3" and above S&W. I'm hoping the new 3" Kimber with the hammer will have a longer ejector rod.
Eddietruett is offline  
Old February 26, 2019, 04:38 PM   #28
Dave Chuppa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Posts: 448
I like the 442. Pocket and waist in my case. 38+P Speer Gold Dot 135gr. proven on the street by the NYPD to stop bad guys.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 05F5B637-46A8-4E07-9518-A3BA6E47915B.jpeg (130.0 KB, 19 views)
__________________
TWO HANDGUNS AND RELOADS, EVERY DAY ALL DAY
Dave Chuppa is offline  
Old February 26, 2019, 05:25 PM   #29
Carmady
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,735
A 9mm LCR, but check it out mechanically in person. LCR's are like a box of chocolates...
Carmady is offline  
Old February 26, 2019, 05:43 PM   #30
105kw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2017
Location: Columbia Basin Washington
Posts: 415
EDC for me is a 442 Smith, 38sp, also favor 135gr Gold Dot.
Just my opinion, but I've never liked the 357 J frame, I'll stick with .38 special.
105kw is offline  
Old February 27, 2019, 02:09 PM   #31
Laz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Posts: 1,278
I have numerous J-frames, all but one are airweights. If I were to buy a .357 J-frame, it would be the 640 Pro (?), the one that has no internal lock. I hate the S&W internal lock. I would look carefully, however, at the Kimber K-6 which I find very intriguing.
__________________
Laz

I’m just a nobody, trying to tell everybody, about Somebody, who can save anybody.
Laz is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 12:06 PM   #32
Gino
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 1998
Location: Lake City, FL USA
Posts: 919
"I'd stay away from the scandium"


Okay, I'm listening...
Gino is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 05:24 PM   #33
labnoti
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2018
Posts: 252
What do you mean "backup" ? Does that mean ankle-carry? You had a Model 60. Is that how you used it? Steel guns can be heavy unless you're wearing stiff and somewhat high boots. I've had bad experiences with 442 and 340PD light-weights with respect to durability. They didn't hold up well to a lot of shooting. But the ankle is where they work. Anywhere else, a K or L frame is better. The 640 Pro Series is probably the nicest of the S&W's, but again, whether it's the 640, 60, SP101 or K6, they're not sub-23oz and for that weight or a little more there are so many better options including K frames and pretty much most of the bestselling polymer-framed compact autos.
labnoti is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 06:00 PM   #34
JERRYS.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,969
the only .357 ("J" frame sized) snubbies I will fire are the SP101, and Model 60 MagNa-Ported. I've trained and qualified with them before and it was sort of brutal. After the Porting it wasn't bad at all. of course if you are just shooting a 30 round static course I guess it doesn't matter.... but actually training with them is a different story.
JERRYS. is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 06:20 PM   #35
1MoreFord
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 244
Let me try again.
1MoreFord is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 06:24 PM   #36
1MoreFord
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill DeShivs View Post
"Has to be .357 Magnum so I can also use .38 Special."

Why not just buy a .38 Special??

Great idea. Too bad the OP doesn't seem to get it.
1MoreFord is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 06:39 PM   #37
labnoti
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2018
Posts: 252
Sorry, the .38 Special +P sucks, even in an airweight gun. Shooting .357 Magnum with full case loads of H110 isn't the best practice for the airlites, but you can easily do a lot better than .38 +P.

In my 442, I could get never get a 125 gr. bullet faster than 850fps.

In a 340 PD, I could load a 125 gr. anywhere from 700 to 1400 fps.

To match the performance of a 9mm compact auto for penetration and expansion, you'd need to drive it to about 1100 fps. This is still a lot of recoil in an airlite, but I would take 1000 fps over 850 fps any day.

Last edited by labnoti; March 1, 2019 at 06:45 PM.
labnoti is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 06:48 PM   #38
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,570
Quote:

Has to be .357 Magnum so I can also use .38 Special.
The OP does get it. It's some of the responders here who don't.

The word also is the key word. A gun chambered in 38 Special will not also fire 357 Magnum.

I think it's very clear what the OP wants. A 357 Magnum. Trying to get them to buy a 38 Special does not fit the criteria, especially when they specifically said what they want.

I understand where the OP is coming from. I have many 357 magnums, and only one 38 special. The 38 Special gun has less versatility.
74A95 is offline  
Old March 1, 2019, 10:16 PM   #39
Cosmodragoon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Location: Northeastern US
Posts: 1,869
I also recommend the LCR, or an LCRX if a hammer is desired.
Cosmodragoon is offline  
Old March 3, 2019, 04:57 PM   #40
dgludwig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2005
Location: North central Ohio
Posts: 7,486
Quote:
Just my opinion, but I've never liked the 357 J frame, I'll stick with .38 special.
Why don't you like the J-frame Smith revolver chambered in .357 Magnum? It will shoot .38 Specials as well as a revolver chambered in .38 Special only, but also has the added advantage of shooting Magnum loads as well, with no downsides. What's wrong with having the added versatility of a .357 Magnum revolver as opposed to a .38 Special revolver?
__________________
ONLY AN ARMED PEOPLE CAN BE TRULY FREE ; ONLY AN UNARMED PEOPLE CAN EVER BE ENSLAVED
...Aristotle
NRA Benefactor Life Member
dgludwig is offline  
Old March 4, 2019, 04:23 PM   #41
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Great idea. Too bad the OP doesn't seem to get it.

How about you ask me before you make any assumptions?

Quote:
The OP does get it. It's some of the responders here who don't.
Unless it's the above assumption. Which is correct.

Quote:
The word also is the key word. A gun chambered in 38 Special will not also fire 357 Magnum.

I think it's very clear what the OP wants. A 357 Magnum. Trying to get them to buy a 38 Special does not fit the criteria, especially when they specifically said what they want.

I understand where the OP is coming from. I have many 357 magnums, and only one 38 special. The 38 Special gun has less versatility.

THANK YOU! That's how you do comprehension right. lol.


I want a J-Frame in 357 magnum so that I may ALSO shoot .38 Special from it.


So far I think I'll be looking at another Model 60. My no dash was only a 38. But I have seen Model 60 revolvers that we chambered in 357. Which would be great.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08885 seconds with 11 queries