|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 31, 2020, 04:33 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2010
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 124
|
Reloading Data Discrepancies
So I'm working on a new load for my .308 AR. I am getting wildly different data on powder loads depending on what source I use. I will be using a Hornady 165 gain SST bullet. I plan to use Hodgdon Varget for the powder. From Hornady's reloading book I get 37.6 gr to 43.2gr. for available charge weights. From the Hodgdon website I get 42.0 to 46.0C. Not really sure which one to use at this point. Any insight would be great! Thanks!
|
July 31, 2020, 05:06 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
You want to use Hodgon's .308 Service Rifle data which is for gas guns. This has a maximum charge of 43.2 grains with a 168-grain match bullet, but that data will work for your 165.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
August 1, 2020, 06:09 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,152
|
Whenever I get large discrepancies I usually go with the lighter load, if it accurate within that range and no pressure signs I’m good. But if there is enough case capacity to go up within a higher recommended load and that’s what it takes to get better accuracy I’ll give it a go while watching for pressure signs. It’s all about being safe and starting low and working your way up.
|
August 1, 2020, 07:04 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
when I see a large discrepancy I either go with the lightest as a starting load or look for a third source
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
August 1, 2020, 07:29 AM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2016
Posts: 6
|
Also,a chronograph is invaluable. While not 100% accurate, they'll give very useful feedback as to where you are within the load range.
|
August 1, 2020, 08:22 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2015
Location: Deepinnaheartta,Texas
Posts: 318
|
This is sound advice:
Quote:
__________________
μολὼν λαβέ NRA Life Member |
|
August 1, 2020, 08:28 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Quote:
Almost that much difference with same length barrels but a .002" difference in groove diameters. Arsenals loading 7.62 NATO ammo see almost a 2 grain spread in charge weights across all bulk powder lots to meet velocity and pressure specs. Commercial 308 Winchester have less spread with canistered powder lots. How tight bullets are gripped by case necks also effects average velocity and peak pressures. 7.62 M80 ball service ammo bullet pull force spec is 60 pounds minimum but M118 match ammo is 20 pounds minimum. No idea what commercial 308 Win ammo specs are. Never seen any bullet pull force spec in reloading data. SAAMI doesn't list any in their cartridge pressure and velocity standards. I've measured pull force on reloaded 308 ammo from 1 to 73 pounds. Last edited by Bart B.; August 1, 2020 at 09:24 AM. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|