|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 22, 2016, 02:33 PM | #51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2016
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
|
May 23, 2016, 05:24 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2012
Posts: 384
|
That's nothing more than a marketing ploy. Will the rifle do it? Sure....most rifles these days can make a similar claim......Usually the real question is can the shooter/ammo combination accomplish that feat?
MOA is a reasonable expectation. Start stretching out the ranges past 100-200 yards and that's when you start running into factors that the shooter can't control which will open up groups considerably. Weatherby makes an excellent product. Careful reloading will probably have you shooting better than MOA.....enjoy your rifle. |
May 23, 2016, 06:09 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2016
Posts: 101
|
That's absolutely true. Oh don't worry I love this rifle and fully expect to get many decades of great hunts out of it and one day in the far far future hand it down to my future grandchildren. I do think within the next few years as I become more proficient with it I may wind up having my smith do some custom work to it to help it shoot even better than it already does. At this point I cannot yet say that I can outshoot what this rifle is capable of. Hopefully that will change in the future
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
September 6, 2016, 11:04 AM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2016
Posts: 101
|
Looks like I may have found a round workup that seems to work well. Attached is a picture from my latest trip to the range. Shot roughly .76 MOA at 100
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
September 6, 2016, 12:16 PM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,000
|
Looks like a winner but you missed the nickel.
__________________
,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 my wife in a discussion about Liberals. Are you ready for civil war? |
September 6, 2016, 06:06 PM | #56 |
Member
Join Date: September 5, 2016
Posts: 58
|
I always assume that these tight shot groups are using a $100+ rifle rest which to me is a bit too scientific for my tastes.
|
September 6, 2016, 08:01 PM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2016
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
|
September 6, 2016, 08:13 PM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2014
Posts: 868
|
The 300 Wby. is a high chamber pressure rifle so stay off the rifling as some one had mentioned for the pressure reason.
So you want to use Barnes bullets? If you haven't purchased them yet try a Hornady A-Max in 150Gr. They are very accurate and you won't need to worry about kinetic energy. 168 gr. might get you more BC if you feel you need it. You don't need to pay the Barnes price for Mileys or Prairie Goats. Practice shooting off hand, kneeling and prone position after you work up your load from a bench. Good Luck. |
September 7, 2016, 09:38 PM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,033
|
Not easy to even reach the lands in a factory chambered Weatherby...they typically freebore them loooong.
Glad you seem to have found your sweet spot. I just finished a load workup for a Vanguard in .300 WBY, found a great load with IMR7828SSC and 180gr Swift Scirocco II bullets loaded to mag length. You're right about no more than 2 shots at a time...that sucker heats up FAST. Anyway we have a good load at just under 3100fps that will consistently do about 2 in groups @ 300 yds using a Lead Sled. Because I found conflicting load data, before doing anything I loaded one round at the lowest of the starting data and went up in 1 gr increments (over a chrony) until I started getting sticky bolt lift and diminishing FPS gains, then used the previous load as my upper limit and then started working up for accuracy. Ultimately ended up very close to the top end of the higher data. |
|
|