|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 18, 2010, 04:50 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 15, 2010
Posts: 113
|
What cities have had their anti gun laws reversed by the Supreme Court?
I only know of one Washington D.C. Are there any others?
|
May 18, 2010, 06:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,478
|
Not yet.
Chicago's case is before the Court now. |
May 18, 2010, 06:14 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 644
|
Yeah, Chicago and its suburb Oak Park are likely to be next. I believe that San Francisco also had a restrictive gun law thrown out a few years ago, but as I recall that was a law forbidding guns in public housing, not a generally applicable law.
This is a question I'd ask over on the Volokh Conspiracy web site (http://volokh.com). A bunch of mostly libertarian-leaning lawyers hang out there and blog about legal issues. The level of discussion has much less heat and much more light than most political discussions I've found on the Internet. The gang there is highly supportive of the Second Amendment, and I bet would have a detailed answer to your question in short order. |
May 19, 2010, 09:38 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2009
Posts: 239
|
|
May 19, 2010, 12:19 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,607
|
So far Washington is the only one that has been formally reversed, although a couple of others (Morton Grove?) took the hint and dropped theirs. Heller only applied to Washington; the Chicago case will establish if the Second Amendment applies to just the Federal government or to State & Local governments as well. It is expected that the Second Amendment will be incorporated to apply to all levels of government. Once that happens there will be a flurry of lawsuits against various State & Local laws.
|
May 19, 2010, 01:57 PM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 14, 2010
Posts: 187
|
Current issue of American Rifleman has an editorial update discussing "consolidation" on Heller. Chicago and San Francisco, some others. Decision should be out this month or soon.
|
May 22, 2010, 12:59 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 138
|
I'm pretty sure Philadelphia had some restrictive gun laws that were overturned by Pennsylvania state preemption laws. Never went to the SCOTUS, though.
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?id=3801 http://forum.pafoa.org/general-2/213...state-law.html
__________________
"No, I will not reread your post." |
May 22, 2010, 05:12 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2, 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 3,943
|
From what I read the big court is going to have to rule
that the 2nd is for everybody and all ...but then they will let themselves out of the bag by saying that lesser governments can impose certain limited restrictions.... and yes, then there will be more suits ..... at least the lawyers will keep their jobs for years to come.
|
May 30, 2010, 07:03 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2009
Location: Kirkland Wa.
Posts: 516
|
If you are not a member, please join the NRA, everything you want to know is available there.
|
May 31, 2010, 12:20 AM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Not exactly a direct reversal, but Morton Grove (who were the first to enact an all-out ban) quietly loosened their laws after the Heller decision.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
|