|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 14, 2019, 12:30 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
practical purpose for .38 spl guns gone....
the gun mind you, not the round.
with airweight J frames and all other revolvers made in .357 mag, what is the practical purpose of the same guns being made in .38 spl anymore? not target shooting specialty guns, but everyday carry guns. you can load any .357 with the lower powered .38 spl so why have a .38 spl version of the very same .357 magnum gun? why the 64 when there is the 65? why the 642 when there is the 340? I'm not talking about the older guns that predated their magnum counterparts, I mean today, why make a .38 spl only gun? |
April 14, 2019, 12:39 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
|
Quote:
My 3" LCRX which is only rate .38 +P is a featherweight and joy to carry. The .357 magnum LCR is just a tad heavier but noticeable in the pocket. Since most people mainly carry .38 and feel .38 +P is the upper limits for their recoil tolerance, the weight savings in the .38 only makes some difference in people's choices in the market place.
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail" |
|
April 14, 2019, 01:29 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Location: Northeastern US
Posts: 1,869
|
As HighValleyRanch already mentioned, the LCR and LCRX have two different frame types. The magnum frames are a little bigger and a little heavier than the ones used for rimfire and .38 special.
Another advantage is that cleaning the chambers is a little easier. Shooting shorter cartridges in longer chambers, such as .38 special in a .357 revolver or .32 H&R Magnum in a .327 revolver, causes crud to build up against the little shoulder inside the chamber. |
April 14, 2019, 02:31 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,432
|
Why? Because shooting full house 357s from a light gun is painful and not really necessary when a 38 or even a +P will suffice.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
April 14, 2019, 04:39 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 777
|
Everyone above nailed it
There are also agencies that only allow 38 Special in their officers BUGs Too many instances of officers playing into the mindset of... "I'll practice with 38 but carry 357" Which in and of itself entirely idiotic But has also contributed to officers being injured and even killed |
April 14, 2019, 04:41 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
|
April 14, 2019, 04:44 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
Quote:
regarding the cleaning, I guess to me cleaning is cleaning and those wanting to use 38s will probably hardly ever use the magnums, so the ring of crud that takes another two minutes to clean won't matter. must be just me. |
|
April 14, 2019, 04:53 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 777
|
Quote:
Some pistols & loads also suffer accuracy issues |
|
April 14, 2019, 04:58 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Location: Northeastern US
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
Seriously though, whether these are minor issues or a major convenience kind of does depend on the person. At least for me, that extra bit of crud bugs me. I almost never shoot the short cartridges in longer-chambered guns. I still have one revolver each in .38 special, .32 H&R Magnum, and .32 S&W Long for if and when I want to use those cartridges. As far as the LCR goes, they look very similar. It's really something that you notice when you hold them side by side or switch from one to the other in a pocket holster. It's not a big enough deal for me to care though. |
|
April 14, 2019, 05:11 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,078
|
'Cause women need 'em. Like my daughter who carries a 5 shot, alloy frame Smith.
|
April 14, 2019, 05:14 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
|
April 14, 2019, 05:26 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
The reason S&W and Ruger make .38s is because that's what people want. I don't really understand why you are asking. You have evidently never fired an Airweight .38 much less a .357 that weighs 13 ounces. Sheesh...................................
|
April 14, 2019, 05:43 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,432
|
Quote:
Like putting an exotic hypercar engine in a daily commuter car; simply not needed.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
April 14, 2019, 05:49 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
If I was buying a snub revolver today it would be a 360J. Why would anyone shoot 357 out of those beasts? Surely no one practices enough to be proficient
__________________
A coward believes he will ever live if he keep him safe from strife: but old age leaves him not long in peace though spears may spare his life. - The Havamal (Bray translation) |
April 14, 2019, 05:57 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
who said you have to shoot 357s in it?
|
April 14, 2019, 06:04 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,525
|
Quote:
|
|
April 14, 2019, 06:15 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
|
April 14, 2019, 06:18 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
|
The question is valid and I understand it completely. I think the answer depends on what the owner feels confident with. In my case, I have a 442-1 that I love and I have complete confidence in the 38 Special +P. My basic criteria was it had to conceal in my front pocket without printing, no exposed hammer and it had to be DA only. The 442 in 38 Special +P is what I finally decided on and I keep it loaded with Federal Premium 38 Special (+P) 129g Hydra Shoks.
To be honest, I did consider a J Frame .357 mag but I could not find one locally that fit my criteria. If I had, I might have that instead. |
April 14, 2019, 06:20 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
The alloy frame 357's cost twice the allow frame 38's. I had my ScTi 357 rebuilt 3 times before I sold it. I don't mind shooting magnums in the beast, it just would not hold up to the magnums.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
April 14, 2019, 06:21 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
Quote:
|
|
April 14, 2019, 10:10 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2018
Posts: 619
|
|
April 15, 2019, 08:35 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
I would ask the question the other way. Is there any practical purpose for .357 snub nose revolvers weighing less than about 20 ounces? The SP101 weights in at 26+ ounces and from my experience is the absolute lightest most* people can begin to proficiently shoot .357 rounds out of with any hope for a follow up shot.
*most is probably an overstatement - even in the SP101 proficiency with .357 rounds (and I don't mean the bottom of the chart 357 rounds) seems suspect |
April 15, 2019, 09:02 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
Follow up shots are not my problem. I don't worry about what any other shooter can or can't do, other than keep trying to get better.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
April 15, 2019, 09:54 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
For the record I can find new 360J (38 special only) for under $500. Should they cost less to produce? I wouldn't think so
|
April 15, 2019, 10:47 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
|
Quote:
I'm shooting slow fire for demonstration purposes and was more tentative on the very first shot because of all the hoopla about how nasty this round was, but more in control on the second shot after I realized it was fine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoB8...ature=youtu.be ================================ As a comparison, watch the amount of muzzle rise with Jeff Quinn shooting 10mm out of a very heavy Ruger Blackhawk in 10mm with a long barrel. If you check the BB website, the loads between the 10mm and the .357 are fairly comprable. HEAVY 10MM OUTDOORSMAN - 220 gr. Hard Cast - FN (1,200 fps/ME 703 ft. lbs.) and out of my LCR, the 180 grain was 1250 fps for 625 ME I don't find anyone posting critical comments about using a 10mm Ruger Blackhawk for woods carry because of excessive muzzle rise for followup shots! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMpb3dSv1R4
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail" |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|