June 26, 2008, 03:32 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 2,011
|
June 26 2008!!!!!!
On this date the supreme court of our land has declared that gun ownership is a constitutional right.
So anyone care to pontificate what this means for firearms owners and esp. NFA devotees?
__________________
ricklin Freedom is not free |
June 26, 2008, 04:00 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
My crystal ball says that as far as the NFA is concerned, todays decision means precisely squat.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
June 26, 2008, 04:25 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
|
Yeah, I'm not seeing any change either.
|
June 26, 2008, 06:06 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Location: indiana
Posts: 57
|
I don't think this will apply to NFA items. However I am glad that people will finally get to utilize their rights. You have to figure that the politicians are only going to let so much slide. If it gets to hog wild on whats permitted to people such as full auto's then I would bet that another type of law will be passed worse than the old ones.
|
June 26, 2008, 06:33 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2007
Location: Kodiak Alaska
Posts: 767
|
to early to know
exactly if there is any affect on NFA. One thing that bothers me is the judicial wording of military. With out some better explanation we could find any and all arms (pistols and rifles) being held by some jurisdiction as not civilian use weapons. Far to much BS going around until some of the actual applications of the decisions are made.
And I'll still hold to my belief that a lot of the NFA type arms owners and dealers are wanting to keep the arms as a controlled item to benefit their pocket books. Should there be a lifting of the various laws where there were no restrictions what would happen to the value of those limited items. I profess those firearms would drop in value overnight. |
June 26, 2008, 06:39 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
|
Yeah I'd be pretty upset about losing seven grand on my M16...but it'd also make it possible for my to own the UMP I've always wanted.
|
June 26, 2008, 06:41 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 18
|
I just like how they say "it's not a common weapon so people shouldn't have it."
Well if it hadn't been banned maybe it would be a common weapon!
__________________
Criminals For Gun Control / Brady's Campaign Pro-Gun Forum Memberships: NRA, PGNH, GONH, Life: JPFO, GOA, Clubs: LF&GC Open Carry NH: My harassment tracker |
June 26, 2008, 06:44 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|