The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 26, 2008, 03:32 PM   #1
Ricklin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 2,011
June 26 2008!!!!!!

On this date the supreme court of our land has declared that gun ownership is a constitutional right.
So anyone care to pontificate what this means for firearms owners and esp. NFA devotees?
__________________
ricklin
Freedom is not free
Ricklin is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 04:00 PM   #2
VUPDblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
My crystal ball says that as far as the NFA is concerned, todays decision means precisely squat.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal !
VUPDblue is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 04:25 PM   #3
hoytinak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
Yeah, I'm not seeing any change either.
hoytinak is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 06:06 PM   #4
jetsfan
Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Location: indiana
Posts: 57
I don't think this will apply to NFA items. However I am glad that people will finally get to utilize their rights. You have to figure that the politicians are only going to let so much slide. If it gets to hog wild on whats permitted to people such as full auto's then I would bet that another type of law will be passed worse than the old ones.
jetsfan is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 06:33 PM   #5
toybox99615
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 2007
Location: Kodiak Alaska
Posts: 767
to early to know

exactly if there is any affect on NFA. One thing that bothers me is the judicial wording of military. With out some better explanation we could find any and all arms (pistols and rifles) being held by some jurisdiction as not civilian use weapons. Far to much BS going around until some of the actual applications of the decisions are made.

And I'll still hold to my belief that a lot of the NFA type arms owners and dealers are wanting to keep the arms as a controlled item to benefit their pocket books. Should there be a lifting of the various laws where there were no restrictions what would happen to the value of those limited items. I profess those firearms would drop in value overnight.
toybox99615 is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 06:39 PM   #6
hoytinak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
Yeah I'd be pretty upset about losing seven grand on my M16...but it'd also make it possible for my to own the UMP I've always wanted.
hoytinak is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 06:41 PM   #7
doobie
Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 18
I just like how they say "it's not a common weapon so people shouldn't have it."

Well if it hadn't been banned maybe it would be a common weapon!
__________________
Criminals For Gun Control / Brady's Campaign Pro-Gun Forum
Memberships: NRA, PGNH, GONH, Life: JPFO, GOA, Clubs: LF&GC
Open Carry NH: My harassment tracker
doobie is offline  
Old June 26, 2008, 06:44 PM   #8
hoytinak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
Quote:
Well if it hadn't been banned maybe it would be a common weapon!
hoytinak is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03586 seconds with 8 queries