|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 7, 2009, 04:21 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2009
Posts: 420
|
Best method for finding bullet seating depth
I want to know the way you guys find the best bullet seating depth for your specific rifle.
|
July 7, 2009, 04:28 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2006
Posts: 596
|
Trail and error goes a long way. A good starting point is your published COL length in your reloading maual.
|
July 7, 2009, 05:00 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 10, 2004
Location: Tioga co. PA
Posts: 2,647
|
Slow but sure method without spending more money:
Seat a bullet long, really long. Coat the bullet with a magic marker. Assuming your doing a bolt rifle, Carefully put the cartridge in the chamber and close the bolt. rock the bold a bit. Carefully remove the cartridge by reaching in and not letting the bullet come in contact with the chamber or action. examine the bullet you should see marks left by the rifling. Seat the bullet a couple thousands shorter and repeat the process. At some point you won't get the marks from the rifling. Seat the bullet and extra .02" Once you have the powder adjusted to the best load. it becomes trial and error to find the sweet spot for COAL. usually it will be between .015 and .03 off the lands rifle. Each rifle will be different. even two with consecutive serial numbers. With revolvers anything that keeps the bullet inside the cylinder is just fine. Self loading pistols is an entirely different procedure.
__________________
USNRET '61-'81 |
July 8, 2009, 06:19 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2006
Posts: 596
|
Quote:
|
|
July 8, 2009, 09:27 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Posts: 925
|
Creeper, very nice article !
|
July 8, 2009, 11:32 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,424
|
1. Published COL
2. Magazine Length |
July 8, 2009, 11:40 AM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 3,668
|
Are you asking how we mechanically determine the seating depth, or, are you asking how we decide on a seating depth?
|
July 8, 2009, 04:44 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2009
Posts: 420
|
I'm asking how you mechanically find the point where the bullet meets the lands. I did as you guys suggested and now i have a length considerably longer than factory length. However now when i load a cartridge it's very tight on the downward movement of the bolt. Why would this be i thought maybe they weren't sized properly however i'm pretty sure they where. Although my lee die's only tend to go to about the beginning of the head of the case maybe a bit less. They don't touch the shellholder like my redding die's do.
|
July 8, 2009, 05:05 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2008
Location: Woooooshington
Posts: 1,797
|
Quote:
micksis86... You've seated the bullet too long. It's very easy to do if you have too much neck tension on your dummy test round. The lands can engrave the soft copper of the jacketed bullet quite easily and deeply. I suggest you try a similar but alternate method. Take the loaded dummy round length you have (you are measuring from case head to ogive with a comparator right... not the somewhat variable tip of the bullet?) and seat your bullet .015" to .020" deeper. Mark the bullet with the permanent marker and carefully chamber the round... see any land marks on the bullet? Yes? You are very close. Play with that in .002" to .005" increments until you just can't see any marks. If you see no marks of any kind on the bullet, you'll need to seat it out .005" longer and try again. Once more, when you get to the point where going plus or minus .002" will get you visible marks or no marks, you are for all intent and purpose, "just touching" the lands in the throat lead. You can back off .005" from this point to insure no possibility of firm chambering or sticking a loaded round in the throat if you want, or you can play with it at just touching. Cheers, C
__________________
Shoulder Drive Nicholson Club |
|
July 8, 2009, 05:38 PM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
Miksis86,
You've found your problem. That Lee die is supposed to touch down on the shell holder, as Lee's own help video shows. If you are unable to size a case with it so adjusted, something else is amis (i.e., wrong die, defective die, expander too low and hitting casehead, expander too high and jamming case mouth at neck, etc.).
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle Last edited by Unclenick; July 8, 2009 at 05:44 PM. |
July 8, 2009, 07:28 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2006
Posts: 596
|
micksis86, Be advised that if you are up against the rifling depending on your load it could cause excessive pressure to the point it could be very dangerous. Did not know and felt most other subjects have been covered except these dangers.
|
July 9, 2009, 09:31 AM | #13 | |
Junior member
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 3,668
|
Quote:
|
|
July 9, 2009, 10:16 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
|
"Although my lee die's only tend to go to about the beginning of the head of the case maybe a bit less. They don't touch the shellholder like my redding die's do."
Not real sure I understand. By "dies", are you refering to the sizer or seater or both? Either way, that's user adjustable. There is little benefit to finding where to seat to touch the rifling within less than maybe 5 thou. Few, if any, factory rifles shoot well that close anyway. We have to set back from .025" to as much as .125" for best accuracy, at least in my experience. So all we really need is a fairly close starting point to work back from, and then keep exact track of where the best seating depth is. |
July 10, 2009, 09:17 AM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 3,668
|
.010" to .020" usually works best for me.
|
July 10, 2009, 10:41 AM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
Those numbers go all over the map, IME, and you have to find what works in your particular gun by taking a starting load and just changing seating depth until you find what makes the gun happy? I would say most guns fall into liking something in the 0.015"-0.050" range best, but some folks swear only 0.015" is best, or only 0.020", or only 0.025", or only 0.030". Some guns, especially those with long throats that can't be reached by the desired bullet weight, will often do best with the bullet bearing surface about one caliber into the case neck. I used to have a link (can't find it just now) to a German site in which a contributor described South African powder company Somachem at one time offering a service in which they tuned first the seating depth, then the powder charge to make best loads for a rifle. They had been brought an old Mauser hunting rifle with a badly worn throat that they were sure would not do well. Nonetheless, when they moved the bullets back to the right length (still magazine feed capable) then tuned the charge, it turned out to be the most accurate rifle they'd ever made up a load for. So, you just don't know until you try? You can certainly see a 0.010" difference in depth open groups up when you have a tight sweet spot load, so figure you'll have to narrow it down that closely in the end, whatever depth it turns out to be?
Some still work loads up touching the lands. Middleton Tompkins has more long range gold medals than anyone else in history, AFAIK, and uses a variant of that approach for matches that let him use his own loads. He sizes case necks with light friction so they will hold the bullet in transport, but he is still able to push the bullet in or pull it out with his fingers. He seats them out long at the loading bench and lets rifle bolt finish seating them against the throat when he loads the gun. The bullet against the throat then becomes the sole start pressure determining fit (no worry about uniform neck pull). He loads for himself, his spouse and two step daughters, all of whom have been national and international champions. Obviously this is a single-shot only load. The main drawback to the Tompkins method is you can't unload without the bullet sticking in the throat. To unload, you have to point the gun muzzle-up and open the bolt slowly to catch the case so you don't end up with an action full of loose powder. A cleaning rod then has to knock the bullet out. Anyway, that approach apparently produces pretty good consistency in the Gallagher/Tompkins guns, which undoubtedly all have short freebore match chambers. I have no idea how that method would compare to others shooting off the bench? Mid Tompkins probably knows, and still uses it. I just mention this to point out it can be done well enough for match shooting and also that the different start pressure reliance is an interesting thing to consider. It is kind of thinking outside the box to take it away from the case neck.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle Last edited by Unclenick; July 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM. |
July 11, 2009, 08:16 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,687
|
Here's the method I've been using for 25 years. I have a Remington cleaning rod that has a green plastic muzzle protector for those who clean from that end. I use it to aid in measuring because it is a flat surface against which I make a pencil mark - which will be more clear as we proceed.
I drop the bullet I am using into the chamber after removing the bolt. Tap it in lightly with the cleaning rod. That bullet is now against the rifling. Drop the cleaning rod gently into the muzzle of the rifle until it stops against the bullet. Make a mark with a pencil half way around the rod at the muzzle end, using the muzzle protector as a flat surface for the pencil. Knock the bullet out of the rifle from the muzzle end. Seat the bullet in an empty, resized, UNprimed case to a length that is obviously too long. Chamber that dummy round into the rifle. If it won't chamber at all, seat it slightly deeper until it does. Once chambered, reinsert the cleaning rod into the muzzle end and once again make a pencil mark, but this time spin the rod so that the pencil mark is completely around the rod. If you have done this right, there should be one pencil mark - the complete circle should have gone right over the half circle. If there is any difference between the two, repeat the process until you have no difference inthe pencil marks. Now your dummy round has the bullet touching the rifling for that bullet. I use a Stoney Point comparator kit that allows me to measure that bullet essentially from the point that touches the rifling to the base of the case. I label that as OAL-OG (OverAllLength to the OGive.). I then seat that bullet 0.015" deeper from the original seated position and I expect that means my bullet is 0.015" from the rifling. You can start at 0.01 and move up to 0.02" if you feel like really experimenting to see exactly where your rifle likes THAT bullet seated. If you load more than one type of bullet for your rifle you will need to do this procedure for every bullet type. You may also need to reset the seating plug when you buy another box of THE SAME bullets as the ogive may not be in exactly the same place as the last lot number. This has rarely been a problem with Nosler bullets and Hornady's SST bullets don't seem to change either. It is an expected variance with Barnes which is why I suspect they advise not to seat the bullets against the rifling. In any case, always seat the new lot number bullet as you normally do and measure with the comparator to be sure the measurement is what you had before. Last edited by cdoc42; July 11, 2009 at 08:21 PM. Reason: Additional info added |
July 12, 2009, 11:50 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2006
Location: WA, the left armpit of the USA
Posts: 1,323
|
People who jam seat bullets, as Nick described, also make sure that they have control over neck tension, since jamming increases start pressure in unpredictable increments, unless there is some relief. Most BR or true match rifles are built to withstand more pressure than the common run of factory rifles, but most shooters will still lessen neck tension in order to lighten, but more importantly, control the pressure. Also remember that once you have found the lands with the ogive of bullet A, that does not mean that bullet B is going into the lands the same way, if at all.
If you experience a really stiff bolt closure, that's telling you you have got into the lands and have too much neck tension. Unless you can ensure that the pressure is the same for each round, you will likely not be happy with the results of jam seating. If you have a rifle with a chamber cut so as to allow jam seating, you might be interested in acquiring some of the tools match shooters use to control neck tension. Forster sells precision over sized expanders and reamers in addition to the usual neck turning equipment. A lot of people like the K&M expander mandrels. Bushing neck dies are also popular. Forster has come out with one that is also a body bump die. Redding has bushing dies and body dies and also FL/bushing dies for loading semi-auto match ammo. Very few rounds are loaded to jam length for semi-autos, other than rounds to be used in slow fire competition where they can be loaded singly.
__________________
"If the enemy is in range, so are you." - Infantry Journal |
July 12, 2009, 09:53 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 980
|
|
|
|