October 2, 2022, 09:09 AM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,486
|
Quote:
|
|
October 2, 2022, 01:40 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,512
|
Great post again (#25) Unclenick.
I knew about the bullet disintegration thing. One of my manuals (Speer, I think; but it could have been Sierra; it wasn't Hornady) cautions about excess velocity with high-twist barrels, using light weight and construction "varmint" type bullets. I've have done load work ups with 55gn varmint bullets. I stopped at 2800 f/s - I figured that's plenty anyway. I also load Hornady's FMJ-BT 55 grainers. I figure they are of a stronger construction than the varmints. It's moot however, cuz I use the same charge weight and the resulting velocity is the same 2800-ish f/s.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
October 2, 2022, 02:47 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 705
|
I may have missed someone mentioning this reading thru this post, but no one mentioned that 556 brass wall is thicker thus increasing higher pressure vs .223 remington, I thought the cases dimensionally were identical? except for case wall thickness. I didnt know they had different leads.
Im assuming thats why we have 556 brass and 223 remington brass. Was surprised no one mentioned this??? |
October 2, 2022, 03:42 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,586
|
That is because 5.56 brass is not thicker. That is overspray myth from 7.62 where is is true.
Starline makes 223 and 5.56 headstamped brass. The metallurgy is different to make the 5.56 head harder. But the deminsions are identical. https://www.starlinebrass.com/556x45mm-brass Also, weighing cases has shown 5.56 to be lighter as often as not. Scroll down to the table. https://www.accurateshooter.com/cart...guides/223rem/ There are other common misconceptions. This link is from MetalGod: https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/
__________________
............ Last edited by Marco Califo; October 2, 2022 at 04:00 PM. Reason: Add links |
October 2, 2022, 03:49 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 705
|
I looked it up
5.56 NATO case capacity: 28.5 grains H2O 223 Remington case capacity: 28.8 grains H2O (+1.1% compared to 5.56 NATO) so its not much of a difference |
October 3, 2022, 10:54 AM | #31 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
It's got a tolerance and is not fixed at specific values that is consistent. Follow the second link Marco put up and scroll down about 1/4 of the way, and you will find a table showing the two highest measured case water overflow capacities at the time it was written were for LC'06 and WCC99 at 30.6 and 30.5 grains, respectively.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 3, 2022, 03:08 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,512
|
I've weighed 223 and 556 brass on a milligram scale.
Most 223 brass hovers right around 6000 milligrams (6 grams); usually a little less 5960-ish, that sorta thing. I don't have much 556 brass, but most exceeds the 6k milligrams; usually a little over, 6030-ish. I have a lot of Frontier 556 brass however, and they weigh out just like the 223 stuff. So I guess it depends on the 556 brass. (YMMV; as my sample was only about ten different brands.)
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
October 3, 2022, 03:50 PM | #33 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
Unfotunately, weight is not a consistently reliable capacity indicator because things that don't affect capacity, like the thickness of the rim, depth and thickness of the extractor groove, and the extractor relief angle, all have tolerances that affect brass weight without influencing the internal capacity. Additionally, different makers use different alloys with a difference in density. The last time I looked at how the two correlate was in 308, and there the capacity followed the weight to within about ±20%. So actual water capacity weight measurements are about the only way (sorry, couldn't resist) to go.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
October 3, 2022, 05:30 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
|
I agree with UN completely. The only time case weight will make a consistent difference in case volume is when that case weight differs by many grains 10+ . If you have one case that weighs 175gr and another that weighs 160 . The 160gr case will almost always allow for more case volume . I’ve done a good bit of this type of testing in the past with 308 cases and I rarely see a +/- 3gr in case weight . There are exemptions for sure and even then its 10gr or less . I have some RIP that weigh in the mid 170’s with most LC , Lapua and Fed weighing in the low to mid 180’s . I also have some Win cases that are weighing in the low 170’s to high 160’s . The Winchester cases held more H2o but don’t remember how much more . I haven’t looked at all that data in awhile , not even sure where its at or where I put the brass if I wanted to test again . I have so much brass it became hard to organize to that degree . It’s here somewhere marked and if I come across it I’ll try to set aside .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|