|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 28, 2015, 11:59 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2012
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 4,594
|
Dillon powder measure question
Does the little built in baffle work well, or should I look into getting a proper baffle?
I used a baffle in my Lee autodisk, and it worked great. If the little built in baffle works, then I will leave it be. |
October 29, 2015, 06:54 AM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
I don't see a problem with the Dillon factory baffle. I don't usually allow the powder level to fall below the baffle while actively loading but I haven't noticed much variance in charge weight if I run the powder lower while trying to empty the hopper.
|
October 29, 2015, 08:44 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2012
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 4,594
|
I know when using a baffle in the Lee... That my charges were very consistent.
But that baffle was much larger, and shipped differently. The Dillon baffle is smaller and built in |
October 29, 2015, 09:26 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,059
|
Does the little built in baffle work well, or should I look into getting a proper baffle?
Yes it works very well . I use two RCBS measures and the dillion is as good or better . |
October 29, 2015, 11:46 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2012
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 4,594
|
Ok, that's good.
The baffle in used in the Lee, left a noticeable air gap over the powder, so it wasn't compressed, and helped it be consistent. That little baffle in the Dillon did not look big enough to do a similar job. |
|
|