The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 1, 2017, 09:35 PM   #1
krieger82
Junior Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2017
Posts: 4
7.35 Carcano Load Developement

I am curious if there are any experienced reloaders for this caliber lurking about. The only published load data I have (and use) is the lee stuff that came with the dies. The loads are rather wimpy, don't come close to the military loading, and are just sub par.

I know, after reading Ackley's test notes, the Carcano action is a relative beast, on par with the tougher actions of its time. This leads me to belive it is capable of much, much more performance.

My first foray is an attempt to use Ramshot Tac starting at 30 grains, working up to 40 in .5 grain increments behind pulled 128 grain surplus pills. I have not fired them yet, because I wanted to see if anyone else out there has hopped up this caliber at all.

I ran numbers on the expansion ratio and such, which plants it somewhere in between 6mm ppc and 308 win in terms of bore to case capacity. This indicated medium burning powders (4895 is a commonly used powder) which seems to indicate Tac and BL-C(2) would be great contenders. Anyone else tried them?

Krieger82

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
krieger82 is offline  
Old February 2, 2017, 10:51 PM   #2
TimW77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2008
Posts: 485
7.35 Carcano Load Development

Check the older Lyman reloading manuals for additional data...

Think the 45th and older editions have the 7.35 in the "obsolete cartridge" section...

T.
TimW77 is offline  
Old February 3, 2017, 01:14 AM   #3
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
I can't access my own copies at the moment, but I believe the Hornady 7th and 8th Editions of their reloading manuals had data. The 9th may, as well.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 02:28 PM   #4
Jeremy2171
Member
 
Join Date: May 2, 2010
Posts: 29
Op... Did you ever test these?
Jeremy2171 is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 07:23 PM   #5
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
I have an old Hornady manual that shows load data for the 7.35 Carcano. Hornady was the only US bullet maker that made bullets for them. The manual is fro the early 1970s, but some of the powders listed are still available.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old April 19, 2017, 12:09 AM   #6
AL45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2012
Posts: 761
I reload for it, but I stick with the Lee load. I just shoot it for fun so I'm not looking to supercharge it. I just wish I could find some bullets for it.
AL45 is offline  
Old April 19, 2017, 11:46 AM   #7
hounddawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
just doing a google search using the phrase "7.35 carcano reloading" gave a couple of dozen or so good links to reloading data with currently available powders. I won't link them but because of possible copy right violations but I would suggest just going to a search engine and doing a search. There is a ton of info out there about this cartridge
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek
hounddawg is offline  
Old April 19, 2017, 09:05 PM   #8
Chainsaw.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
Lee books shows 31.7 as max load for IMR4895. If youve already come up from the bottom and find the max to be weining I see no issue of working up. Sounds like you know what you are doing. Dont splode yer self!
__________________
Just shoot the damn thing.
Chainsaw. is offline  
Old April 20, 2017, 02:13 AM   #9
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
Quote:
I know, after reading Ackley's test notes, the Carcano action is a relative beast, on par with the tougher actions of its time. This leads me to belive it is capable of much, much more performance.
While the ultimate blow up strength of an action is something good to know, how an action handles gas from a ruptured case is more important and Carcanos do not have a good reputation in this regard. Always, ALWAYS, ALWAYS wear EYE PROTECTION!!!!!

The Lyman 45th Edition (1970) has the 7.35mm in the active, not the obsolete cartridge section.

Bore size varies in these guns, so check yours, don't just accept it actually is the listed standard. There are even stories of gas "blowback" in Carcanos when undersized bullets have been fired (too LOW pressure). Can't say its true, and won't say its not, but there's been talk...

The old Lyman manual warns of this in the 6.5mm section, and recommends only using cast bullets correctly sized to your rifle's bore diameter, in both 7.5 & 7.35mm Italian.

My old book says jacketed bullets are .298" Speer 150gr and .300" Hornady 128gr. I don't load this round, and have no idea if these bullets are still available today. It also says cast bullets should be sized .299" or .301". and that most rifles run .300-.302".

Good Luck, and be safe!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06698 seconds with 8 queries