The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 30, 2008, 08:06 PM   #26
Yellowfin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: Lancaster Co, PA
Posts: 2,311
^ Add also someone attacking from a garage, driveway, up or down stairs, or back yard.
__________________
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus http://www.concealedcampus.org
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" - Penn Jillette
Yellowfin is offline  
Old August 30, 2008, 10:37 PM   #27
Tuckahoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Location: Central eastern North Carolina
Posts: 194
In police academy they taught us that most shootings occur between three to five yards with two to three shots fired total. At that distance reliable is more important than accurate.
__________________
You know a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy
Charles Manson
Tuckahoe is offline  
Old August 31, 2008, 01:08 AM   #28
Jermtheory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2007
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
If you limit "self-defense" strictly to yourself and those within your immediate vicinity (a few steps), the probably.

Where 25 yard shots might be necessary;
- "Defense of another": Where the other person being victimized is on the far side of a barrier you can't climb over - e.g. a chain link fence.

- Where a person outside your home (or another person's home) is preparing to use a Molotov cocktail and it's not even 5pm yet.

- The obvious: You are under fire from someone 25 yards away.
exactly.

for the first example i would say no barrier would even be necessarry other than space and the lack of time to close it.


if you're ever in position to need to fire at 25 yards or more you can just yell statistics at the threat.

if we're simply playing the odds,where do you draw the line?odds are you wont need your weapon for self-defense anyway.

maybe being fired on from 100 yards out,by some meth head with a shotgun,who thought i was snooping arround his "lab",has skewed my view of things.i was in the middle of a field with no cover in sight,wearing a full leg brace from a injured knee,and i thought the trailer he came from was abandoned(sure looked it).i dont even know if he was trying to hit me,or just scare me off.but he was hitting close enough for dirt that got kicked up to hit me at one point.

i would have attempted a shot if i had been carrying at the time(it was actually the event which caused me to never go without since).if nothing else it may have had a negative effect on his accuracy and/or his interest.

...ntm i have 2 bad knees and out running anyone is unlikely.

yes...the odds say closer is much more likely,but 25 yards isnt that far at all.it is indeed very possible for someone to present a threat from that range or even much further.

i know the stats didnt make me feel any better at the time.

"just relax,this shouldnt be happening"

i see no down side in being as effective as possible with your chosen weapon.
__________________
I'm moving on.Too many fudds,fanboys,and general silliness.

It's been fun(in part).
Jermtheory is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 08:34 AM   #29
shaman
Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Posts: 65
new wife shows up in the marriage with a little taurus snubby in 38. she had never shot it.

ive got her working on drills with the pistol practically touching the paper.
we do one target and two target drills.
draw and two for first, two for second with one left while she is backing away.

one target draw and four then back away with one left in the gun.

im no defence expert of course and this is the best i could think up for her with this little pistol. with five rounds of 38 special my thinking is pretty much two targets max with one round reserve.

whenever we get back to texas we absolutely have to get her something else.

she is responding well to the ar i bought her but so far it is just bench paper punching.

today(its just dawn now) ive decided its time for her to start some simple multiple target stuff with the ar.

25 yards is a long long shot with a pistol. i normally practice at 7 or so with the 25 kept to a minimum(45 ammo aint cheap)

i try to make every shot a good shot, close or far. as time passes im gettin quicker with the 45.(its a para p13)
shaman is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 08:59 AM   #30
freakshow10mm
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 1,398
I train longer distances to work on trigger control. 90% of my training distance is within 10-12 feet.
freakshow10mm is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 09:08 AM   #31
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
I do a lot of shooting at 25 plus yards. What we seem to be leaving out is the confidence factor. Shooting my 642 had really increased my conidence in that little pistol, as my confidence goes up my close range shooting gets better.

I have another problem here. I live out in the country. I have critters, coyotes, foxes and domestic dogs trying to get my chickens. Yeah I like to keep a rifle loaded and handy but its not always the case. I might (and have) had to use a pistol to discourage critters from eatin my chickens at 25 yards or more.

I need the confidence that practicing at 25 + yards even for my little 642. I also carry my Model 28 Smith in my truck wanting to pop every coyote I see. I like the ideal of being able to shoot a revolver at longer ranges.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 10:48 AM   #32
ringworm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Posts: 257
tell me how you plan to justify shooting a person at 25 yards and calling that defense.

the percentage of times in which that improbable scenario would occure is so miniscule as to not even register.

Anyone who engages a target at 25 yards with a handgun is going to be held liable for those misses.
In a static course of fire with calm nerves very few shooters can engage a charlie size target w/ scoreable accurace.
You think thats going to improve in an actual shoot-out?
so while you blasting away at a perp 25 yards away whos getting hit with your misses?
#1 improbable
#2 irresponsible
__________________
"Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and higher education positively fortifies it." Stephen Vizinczey
ringworm is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 12:31 PM   #33
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
There are work environments with building spaces and hallways that easily reach 25 yards or longer. My office opens to such a space.

It is conceivable that one could enter a conflict in such a work space. Of course, one might try to seek cover and avoid, but I can easily see having to engage in such a large space.

Thus the initial conjecture might be relevant in home but not at some work places.

There was an AF military police officer who stopped a rampage shooter with a shot at 75 yards using an M9. Unlikely perhaps but not outside the range. Training just for the mean ignores the chance of the extreme situation. You should be able to get around in a person sized target at some distance. The mean isn't what always happens.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 12:49 PM   #34
Jermtheory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2007
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
tell me how you plan to justify shooting a person at 25 yards and calling that defense.
multiple legitimate examples have already been given.i just gave a first hand account of where i feel i would have been justified taking a shot at 100 yards(although it would have been more for psychological affect than anything).

or how about when i take my wifes ankle biter out in the middle of the night...

i see an armed man breaking into my grandparents house about 50 yards away.you think im going to sneek up over half that distance before calling them out(or hope im a better shot and keep as much distance as possible).?...or what if im spotted half way?

something like could never happen.

dont tell me to go back inside,call the police,and wait for 30 minutes to an hour either.

Quote:
the percentage of times in which that improbable scenario would occure is so miniscule as to not even register.
again...if you're ever in position to need to fire at 25 yards or more you can just yell statistics at the threat.

Quote:
In a static course of fire with calm nerves very few shooters can engage a charlie size target w/ scoreable accurace.
i guess i'll take that as a compliment.

another reason why my carry gun is a full size M&P-9.not a J-frame or some subcompact...i can put shots in a 6" target all day at 25 yards.

i must live in a world where 25 yards is measured differently from some of you.ive seen people hit with thrown bricks at 20+ yards,yet somehow its a great abyss in some of your minds.you let some statistics override common sense and the obvious fact that a legitimate threat can be presented from ranges outside of contact distance.

it may be unlikely to engange a threat at that range,but im having a hard time understand the problem with being capable of doing so if needed.

i just read a story about an officer in CA who stopped a shooter at 100~ yards with his sidearm...wonder if he thought he'd ever need to do such an incredible thing.yes im well aware there's a difference between LEO and CC...but the point stands.how likely was it for him to need to make that shot with his pistol,even as an LEO?
Jermtheory is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 01:00 PM   #35
Scattergun Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 29, 2008
Location: Nine Mile Falls, Washington
Posts: 1,186
ringworm

You Said: #1 improbable, #2 irresponsible , I think you are a little over the top here. No one advocated that you do not have a responsibility to control your rounds. With most modern handgun projectiles passing thru human bodies what guarantee that a close range you will not damage non-combatants?

As far as improbable, inside our homes, I agree. Those of us who carry during our daily business, NOT so improbable. My associates and I worked very hard to be accurate at extended range. True, as peace officers we had a obligation to do so. However, that experience taught me that a quick prone 25 yrd shot is not as hard as YOU believe it to be. Many can accomplish that goal.

It would be nice to say the WE KNOW all of the variables that will will occur that influence the outcome of a gun fight. However, the sad fact is that we know very little of the next event.

Above our briefing room door was this sign;

THE TWO QUESTIONS NO ONE CAN ANSWER;

WHAT WILL THE STIMULUS TO FIGHT LOOK LIKE

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO WIN THE NEXT ENGAGEMENT


I get tired of saying this, hopefully you all will get tired of hearing it and stop arguing about it. As a defensive shooter, we give up much, the OTHER GUY will get to dictate when and where and how far away the gunfight will be, we will respond to that threat as best we can.

I am very hopeful that you like me have other tools on your belt besides shooting to help win an engagment past the caculated average gunfight distance.

Good Luck & Be Safe
__________________
First, with the most, WINS!
Regards, Scattergun Bob
Scattergun Bob is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 01:56 PM   #36
Jermtheory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2007
Posts: 1,283
oops...

looks like my targets are 8" not 6".

and this...

Quote:
ive seen people hit with thrown bricks at 20+ yards
should have read...

"ive seen people hit with thrown bricks at 20~ yards"

didnt want to edit actual content so long after posting.
Jermtheory is offline  
Old September 1, 2008, 04:51 PM   #37
shaman
Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Posts: 65
i remember long long years ago we used to set up five gallon buckets across the field and shoot at em with my old taurus 92. i was always amazed at how many times we (brother an i) could hit the bucket.

did same thing with hi-standard longhorn double nine revolver(that was lots harder).

i agree that going 25 yards makes ya aim the pistol.

i also think that anyone who has their handgun for self protection( as opposed to pure target) should spend the majority of their time at 3-7 yards.

im learning myself that it is really not easy to get a pistol out, get it on target and get two rounds off and hit the target.

i know that all things can be learned and so i try and try.
shaman is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 12:45 AM   #38
BillCA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
Quote:
In a static course of fire with calm nerves very few shooters can engage a charlie size target w/ scoreable accurace.
You think thats going to improve in an actual shoot-out?
so while you blasting away at a perp 25 yards away whos getting hit with your misses?
#1 improbable
#2 irresponsible
I disagree. I used to shoot the old PPC silhoutte course and 25 yards was not considered a long distance shot. 50 yards was much tougher to make good scores on. Hitting the "Charlie size target" was not hard at all, the hard part was keeping them inside the 10-ring.

In actual shoot-outs, police are sometimes called upon to shoot at 25-50 yards. Yes, they miss, but they can also be accurate enough to down bad guys.

With a snubbie or compact auto, 25 yards may be the limit for most folks to hit with any accuracy. The guns are capable of making good hits, it's up to the shooter to place them.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately)
BillCA is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 03:08 AM   #39
Nnobby45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
So, we can pretty much rule out accuracy at 25 yards as irrelevant to
self defense and home defense...........

I've always been amused at those who consider the average gunfight distance the standard they'll have to meet should it happen to them. Averages take in all the extremes. While they apply most of the time---not always.

Or the number of shots they'll need based on more averages.

Or the contention that their range ability is somehow related to fighting for their life under more stress than most people have ever experienced.

I've seen pro basketball players who can sink 10 of 10 freethrows in practice, with regularity, choke. With nothing more than a game on the line. Same for pitchers who need that one big pitch, or the field goal kicker who muffed a 30 yarder (like tonight when UCLA beat Tennessee in OT). They choked with less adrenaline in their system than we'd have in a gunfight.

If I knew in advance what the circumstances would be I'd stay home that day, or, if unavoidable, be appropriately armed.
Nnobby45 is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 03:49 AM   #40
evan1293
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 783
A lot of the 'old bullseye mentality' is still around these days when it comes to training for handgun fights. 10,15,25 yards are not at all typical distances that handgun fights occur at for the ccw holder. Even police shootings tend to occur within 6 feet. That being said, I find it interesting that most people I see at the range are training at distance of greater than 7 yards. I've been somewhat turned off by IDPA for this reason because most of the shots that I've been required to take have been at 10-15yards. Many of these shots seem to include no shoot 'hostages,' that would be utterly ridiculous if attempted in the real life stress of a gunfight. While a true test of marksmanship skill, they do little to resemble the reality of most gunfights.

Marksmanship is one thing, and is fun and important to become profficient at, but the reality is that gunfights happen in our comfort zones not way down range. While a 15 or 25 yard group the size of a quarter is something quite impressive, it really isn't going to help us when someone is threatening us at distances so close, we can smell his bad breathe.

If any of you have read "On Killing" by Dave Grossman you'll know that there are many problems that arise when facing an adversary that is right in front of us. Having to see a threat's face and then react with deadly force is a hugely difficult task according to Grossman. Heart rates around 175 bpm, tunnel vision, auditory exlusion, even the voiding of the bowels can occur when a human is threatened at such personal distances. These issues are a far cry from trying to keep 5 shots in the 10 ring at 25 yards. Training with gross motor skills, shooting with retention, and learning to shoot fast are far more important skills in my opinon.

Its great to be skilled with your handgun. Be able to make those 25 and 50 yard COM shots. But I wouldn't waste a lot of time and ammo shooting at those distances. I'd spend more time at contact distances out to about 20' because history tells us thats where most fights happen.
evan1293 is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 09:29 AM   #41
Flyboy_451
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 172
I find it somewhat disturbing that there are those who feel that practice at distances greater than 10-15 is not beneficial. While it is quite unlikely that you would have to engage a threat at 25 yards, the ability to accurately place shots at long distance can greatly enhance short range accuracy. Longer ranges force you to focus on the fundamentals of shooting. Longer ranges also serve as an effective measuring tool for your own abilities with a given firearm.

Long range shots are by no means common in self defense, but the ability to place a shot accurately at 25 yards, or even greater, should not be discounted. One thing that anyone engaged in a life threatening situation should be trained to do is to place distance between yourself and the threat. It may be that no hits are scored by either party at close range, yet the perpetrator does not disengage and you are not able to safely flee. While this is not likely to be the case, it is a possibility. Distance favors the marksman, and the odds of survival are proportional to your abilities. Training only for short range engagements limits your abilities and could place you at a disadvantage. This is opposite to the very reason that we carry firearms for defensive use. In taking responsibility for the safety of yourselves and your loved ones, do you not feel it necessary to be as proficient as possible with your chosen equipment? I have often said that I would rather have a gun and not need it, than to need it and not have it. But having the gun does not equl being able to use it effectively.


DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO CREATE ADVANTAGES!!!
Flyboy_451 is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 10:01 AM   #42
buzz_knox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
Take some time and look at the distances involved in our everyday life. You'll find that 25 yards is nothing. Does your office building have any hallways or corridors? I bet many of them are farther than 25 yards. Your parking lot is larger than that if it holds more than a few cars. How about the grocery store you shop at, or the mall, or the department store?

Statistics say that most everyone who carries a weapon for self-defense will not be required to ever discharge it. Carrying ammunition is thus hedging your bets against the day when the averages turn against you. So, why train with the expectations that on that day, the averages will run your way?
buzz_knox is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 10:09 AM   #43
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
This thread again demonstrates that folks don't understand statistics. The average is not guaranteed to happen most of the time. It depends on distributional shape.

One of the curses of the gun fight world is a lack of knowledge of how to understand these kind of human factor situations. The methodology is widely known in all kinds of other emergency situations. But not here - just anecdotes and misuse of the concept of 'average'.

How about this - the average man is about 5'9 - is it a waste to spar with some guy who is 6'2?
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 10:20 AM   #44
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
Quote:
...folks don't understand statistics.

That may be the truest statement yet. Standard deviation is very important in determining the usefulness of the number that is "average". People ignore everything except that single number we call "average".
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 12:54 PM   #45
Keltyke
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
Quote:
So, we can pretty much rule out accuracy at 25 yards as irrelevant to self defense and home defense.
Not necessarily. Practice hitting COM at 25 yards and you won't even have to think at 5.

Distance of engagement depends on what the BG is armed with. Again, he must have means, intent, and opportunity.

If someone with a knife says he's gonna kill you, and he's across the parking lot, he has means (knife) and intent (statement), but not opportunity (too far away). If you shoot at this distance, you might be hard-pressed to defend your actions in court. As soon as he's within knife throwing range, THEN you can engage. If he's armed with a rifle, you can engage as soon as you think you can hit him, since he now has the opportunity (rifle is a long distance weapon).

So, practice at long distance. Practice pulling and shooting from the hip from 3', too.
Keltyke is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 12:58 PM   #46
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
Quote:
Not necessarily. Practice hitting COM at 25 yards and you won't even have to think at 5.
I compare it to my archery practice. I set my 20 yard pin and don't shoot a single arrow at that distance the rest of the year, practicing at 30 and 40 yards instead. Right before the season I shoot some arrows at 20 yards, since the vast majority of my deer have been at 20 yards or less, just to be sure. After all that longer range work, 20 yards is a joke.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old September 2, 2008, 11:51 PM   #47
BillCA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
One also has to account for the types of incidents used to derive the "average distance". Many of these include police contacts. Seven yards happens to be the distance between the driver an the officer's car door (plus/minus a foot or two). It also happens to be the distance across the average family living room or recreation room where a lot of DV's (dom.violence) calls are handled.

For civilians, it's likely to be up close and personal. Shooting at 7-25 yards won't prepare you for that 3-8 foot encounter. Nor will it prepare you for handling the "contact" shooting where you're in physical contact with the perp.

There is benefit to training at all distances.

Other statistics show that gunfight with criminals are won by the good guys® the more distance increases. The BG's practice point shooting and close distance shooting but often lack the discipline to train for 15-25 yard shots.

Remember D + C = T & S
Distance plus Cover = Time & Safety.

Also remember that you will never have enough skill to beat your adversary's sudden acquisition of "dumb luck".

For those who see 25 yards as improbable, that distance is about equal to shooting across a 4-lane highway from curb to curb. I'd certainly like to be able to hit someone shooting from a window at that distance. Wouldn't you? Try measuring a 75-ft piece of string and measure from your doorknob to see how far way it is in your neighborhood. Swing it left and right to see how far down the street it is too.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately)
BillCA is offline  
Old September 3, 2008, 12:10 AM   #48
Jermtheory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2007
Posts: 1,283
wouldnt even make it to the end of my driveway(which isnt long).
Jermtheory is offline  
Old September 3, 2008, 03:12 PM   #49
fm2
Member
 
Join Date: September 25, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 47
Quote:
Training just for the mean ignores the chance of the extreme situation. You should be able to get around in a person sized target at some distance. The mean isn't what always happens.
Excellent point! It's a hell of a thing to find out YOU are the statistical outlier when its GO time.


I'm gonna stop saying I'm an average shooter and just go with " I'm a mean shooter. It just has a better ring to it.
fm2 is offline  
Old September 3, 2008, 03:25 PM   #50
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,453
1. There are no 'rules' which won't be broken in a gunfight.

2. Your problem will be 'That SOB over THERE, who is trying to KILL me!"

3. Your solution is to hit him center and hard, wherever he is and until he goes down- before he can get that done.

4. The distance to 'over THERE' is determined after the dance is over- and is inconsequential to you, as long as you can avoid incoming and land the hits.

5. Expect (and train for) the worst- and then anything else will be a pleasant surprise.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice.
Sarge is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11304 seconds with 8 queries