November 29, 2019, 01:49 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,658
|
Labradar has it's quirks--but overall the time saved and tracking features easily pay for themselves quickly over less expensive optical chrono--I'd never even consider going back to an optical chrono (unless my labradar goes down and I have no other back-up).
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
November 29, 2019, 04:28 PM | #27 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
That's pretty much where I am with it. I frequently lug a lot of stuff to the range so anything that saves setup time and automatically makes the records I would otherwise have to enter manually, is a plus to me. I've still got my opticals on standby, though.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 29, 2019, 06:47 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
|
Quote:
|
|
December 2, 2019, 08:20 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,665
|
Am still considering the use of a chronograph one of the most important safety measures available for loading higher pressure rounds. Is it as accurate/precise as more expensive methods, not likely. But if you are getting velocity's higher out side what you are expecting, you are forewarned. It gives a cheap method for checking the effects of differing powder lots, as learned from using RL-22 years ago. Also as a method for checking hand loading practices, as learned from not having enough case neck tension with pistol rounds.
|
December 2, 2019, 09:48 AM | #30 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
The trick with pressure is you have to remember velocity and bullet mass will give you muzzle energy which gives you the average force behind the bullet in the bore. After dividing that force by the bullet cross-sectional area, you get average pressure. But because the peak pressure and the muzzle pressure aren't changed the same amount when a powder charge is changed, either by weight or by type of powder producing the velocity, you can't get to peak pressure directly from velocity. That takes using a program like QuickLOAD to mimic a test gun load, then altering it to mimic what you are getting for velocity, and then seeing what the resulting percent change in peak pressure was and applying that percent change to the measured test barrel pressure. What you can say, though, is that if you get less velocity from a load than the published load got, even after adjusting for barrel length, then you are running at lower pressure than the same charge got in the test gun.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
December 2, 2019, 01:10 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2017
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 831
|
Thanks to everyone for their input and very useful information. Have to be honest some of the posts, I have to read twice to fully understand it, but non the less very informative. I always start at the bottom and always load 5 groups of .5 grains. Haven't come close to max loads yet.
Definitely am not able to spend on a Labradar. |
December 2, 2019, 01:38 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,665
|
While not nearly as convenient, you should be able to get a chrono for close to $100.
As an example lets say you are using factory load information. Now suppose there is a factor in your particular rifle, caliber, powder /bullet/primer lot that would lead to higher pressures. Say the book says the combination gets about 2600 fps, but you chrono 2800 fps for the combination. The velocity you get is a heads up. Of course there are other numerous factors to consider like barrel length etc. Not saying it's accurate/precise measurement of pressure, but certainly an indication that is relatively cheap, and in some opinions more useful than reading primers/bolt lift etc. Just an opinion. |
December 2, 2019, 01:52 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2017
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 831
|
Thank you, almost seems like a hit or miss with a chronograph???
|
December 2, 2019, 04:41 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,665
|
You're welcome but am not understanding hit or miss with a chronograph?
|
December 2, 2019, 09:09 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2017
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 831
|
Meant with getting velocity readings. May or may not be exact???
|
December 3, 2019, 06:42 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,665
|
Cheaper chrono's can have problems with low angle sunshine, and give bad readings on occasion. On the F1 owned, this is mitigated by 2 small cardboard pieces placed in slot directly in front of the "eyes". As far as being "exact", how would you determine the exact velocity to determine that? Uncle Nick would likely know. There are comparison vids to compare various chrono's, and i would likely trust the accuracy of Labradar's readings over a cheaper F1. Alot of how the F1 reads may be influenced by how it is set up each time, but how accurate do you actually need?
https://www.ar15.com/forums/Precisio...in-OP/10-6511/ |
December 3, 2019, 11:57 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Quote:
Chronos are, those who are going to shoot them and those who are going to (not to mention someday they will fail). So get a decent one with the remote reader for $100, shoot one, have one fail and you are up to $300. And the time spent fiddling getting it setup while pole look at you (I hate the look and I hate the ones who I am looking AT!) Ergo, Lab Radar or Bust (get what works right or nothing)
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
|
December 3, 2019, 07:17 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
|
Quote:
|
|
December 4, 2019, 09:17 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2017
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 831
|
Ouch, that would be embarassing. But sucks even more if damage one that cost a lot.
|
December 4, 2019, 03:09 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,665
|
Have personally shot and killed one, while only winging another. Used to use one quite a bit, and goyt in troulble swithing guns while trying to shoot low over the sensors to beat the sun. Working up loads for over 30 calibers, used to use a chrono almost every range session. If was just starting out, anticiptating using it alot and had the resources, would be getting a labradar. Using a chrono can be real pia at crowded range.
|
December 4, 2019, 10:10 PM | #41 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
December 7, 2019, 11:14 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
|
I have come to realize that what shoots, shoots. I dont care about the velocity. (For paper punching)
|
December 7, 2019, 11:36 AM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Quote:
This is called "positive compensation" for velocity spreads and moving weights on the barrel muzzle adjust the muzzle vibration frequency to make this happen. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|