February 29, 2020, 06:06 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
Arisaka type 99
Hey guys
I found a Arisaka type 99 at my local LGS, they want $399. The stock has separated at the join line and the bolt dust cover and monopod are missing. Is this a good price? Gary Last edited by GaryED50; February 29, 2020 at 06:28 PM. |
February 29, 2020, 07:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Tx Panhandle Territory
Posts: 4,160
|
Not sure on the price, but these folks seem to have a healthy assortment of parts and knowledge on the Jap rifles. http://oldguns.net/
__________________
Rednecks... Keeping the woods critter-free since March 2, 1836. (TX Independence Day) I suspect a thing or two... because I've seen a thing or two. |
February 29, 2020, 08:58 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2018
Posts: 217
|
Without knowing the maker , series and condition there is no way to tell . Some never had DC's or pods .
|
February 29, 2020, 09:50 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,693
|
Pictures would help but I'm thinking your answer is no. The last time I saw some 99's they were about $199. Even picked up a Type 38 for $189 and it shoots great.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member |
March 1, 2020, 12:08 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
60/40 probably not.
Owned two type 99s and a type 38.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
March 1, 2020, 03:02 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Not a good price.
Many idiots will pay such for a common rifle, but it's not a good price unless it's a (very) rare specimen. They're pricing for boomers. But that market is dying (literally and metaphorically). All 'traditional' collectibles are going to crash in value over the next 20 years, as the market is flooded by estate sales and "gotta make the mortgage payment on a fixed income"-offloads. Modern collectibles are another topic. But the Jap 99 is a 'traditional' collectible. ...And that market is tanking.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
March 1, 2020, 04:51 AM | #7 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
OK, dust cover and monopod missing...this is the usual condition. Very few guns have these original parts, as the Japanese soldiers themselves ditched the dust covers whenever they could get away with it. Is the chrysanthemum intact, or defaced? Makes a difference to collectors. AA sights? correct for certain vintage, deleted on late models. Ballistics are essentially identical to the .303 British, same bullet at the same speed. Case is different though. Ammo is a niche item, its out there, but spendy. New brass is where and if you find it. Functional cases can be made from .30-06. Stocks often separate at the joints both butt and forearm. This is common because the glue used has simply "died of old age". As long as the wood is in good shape they can be cleaned and reglued.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
March 1, 2020, 01:31 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
Americans ditched the dust covers. The Japanese did not. It is exceptionally common for dust covers to be missing - especially original dust covers. But it was not the Japanese that tossed them. If you want an interesting and at least somewhat enjoyable way of disproving or supporting the myth for yourself, via photographic evidence, spend a few hours browsing WWII archive collections. I have spent around a hundred hours of my own time, as part of a group of people seeking evidence of actual field use (and what type of use) of various variants of firearms in WWI and WWII. Noting the absence of a dust cover on Jap rifles in the possession of Japanese soldiers is one of the smaller, secondary data points (for an upcoming book). To date, all of the photographs and accompanying reports (when available) support the Japs keeping the dust covers. But as soon as the rifles show up in the hands of Americans, Brits, or Aussies, the dust covers are magically missing. We Americans have had it wrong ... forever.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
March 1, 2020, 05:24 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
Gary |
|
March 3, 2020, 01:50 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
I very much doubt every Japanese battle rifle came with a mono pod.
Go here. Teri is a Canadian academic who plays with Japanese firearms. http://www.nambuworld.com/arisakas.htm Gunbroker shows 'em from $125 to over $700. "...separated at the join line..." Suggests less than optimum condition. Condition being everything when it comes to milsurps. "...done by the Japanese after surrender..." Douglas would not have allowed the Japanese to have a rifle after they surrendered.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
March 3, 2020, 02:00 PM | #11 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
The generally accepted version today is that the after the surrender was ordered, the Mums were ground (or otherwise defaced) to preserve Japanese honor. One set of stories has the Japanese doing it, and another has US troops doing it. Another has US troops doing it when the rifles came into the US. The only thing we know for sure is that collectors pay more for an intact Mum rifle than for one that has been ground. Intact Mums are assumed to be "captured" or "battlefield pick up" and therefor have a different spot in history, which some collectors pay extra to have.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
March 10, 2020, 10:51 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
After spending a lot of time casually perusing pictures of Arisakas at the front, I've come to believe that in fact the Japanese didn't remove the dust covers.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
March 10, 2020, 08:32 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
Does the bolt cover have to come off to remove the bolt from the receiver?
"A lot" of Arisakas have mismatched bolts; nobody bothered to grab a bolt cover from the pile when installing random bolts in surrendered rifles?
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
March 10, 2020, 10:41 PM | #14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
...And is a pain to get everything lined back up at the same time, when reinstalling. With practice, it can be done quickly. But it's still a pain, and still slower than a comparable Mauser-derived rifle. I absolutely understand why Americans - military or civilian - ditched the dust covers. They're an annoyance that our country felt was completely unnecessary. (Minor sidebar: Contrary to popular belief, the dust covers don't rattle, either. They fit quite nicely - even the reproductions. The bolt makes FAR more noise than the cover. On some rifles, I think the dust cover actually muffles the bolt noise.) Quote:
Very difficult to prove at this point, though.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
||
March 11, 2020, 02:42 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
|
Quote:
I can only suppose that when Type 99's were collected for souvenirs, the dust covers seemed unimportant... Tony |
|
March 11, 2020, 10:29 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
I mean no disrespect to the memory of your father, but that is ridiculous.
Japanese soldiers, especially new recruits, would not be casting aside standard equipment en masse. Nor do historical records support the claim. To me, that story is on par with my grandfather saving the Yorktown (CV-10) by using his shoulder to deflect a Zero's 20mm projectile away from a torpedo on an SBD that was awaiting take off. Sure, he was there. Sure, he was injured. Yes, he has one hell of a scar to prove it. Yes, most of the crew thought he was dead and didn't see him again until decades later. (Even though my grandfather spent another 16 years in the Navy.) But the truth behind the story is that he was pinched in the unfolding wing of an F6F. They're good stories, but the only reason they've survived this long is because they both play upon the stereotype of the Japanese fielding inferior equipment - and, in the case of the dust covers being tossed aside, also the stereotype of the soldiers being undisciplined and untrained.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
March 11, 2020, 10:37 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2018
Posts: 217
|
By Feb 45 NO Type -99 was being made with any pods or covers , had not been for a while . So NO new recruits would have them .
|
|
|