January 25, 2002, 05:44 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
Shot strings
In my reading up on the differences between steel and lead I keep hearing about the fact that steel has a much shorter shot string than lead. Now normally I wouldn't pay much attention to this and just revert back to my much less technical gun shooting theory "PTGGB". Pull Trigger Gun Go Boom. The thing that has got me wondering about this though is that most places that talk about how this can induce missed shots. In example, a person misses a shot with steel, but if he had taken the same shot using the lead equal.
So my questions are, why does a shorter shot string reduce your chance of scoring a hit on a target? And if that same shot would of hit with lead, because of a longer shot string, would it of been a solid hit or would it still have mostly been a miss? Also if someone could explain to me the how and why's of the shot string effect on preformance, and how much difference it actually makes would be much appreciated. Sincerely, Adam
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
January 25, 2002, 06:41 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
|
I don't know if steel has a shorter string or not, but, if it did (& regardless of material) a shorter string would give less time for the target to be inveloped by the string.
Same as a clear miss with two cars at 90 degress through an intersection versus a car & a semi - just longer chance of a hit. Too, some of those longer "misses" with steel aren't. Steel (shot size being equal) doesn't pack as much punch at the longer distances as lead. I'd bet that steel causes/ed more cripples than any single other factor. Well, not steel itself, but a hunters' use of it. |
January 25, 2002, 08:15 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 74
|
Short Shot strings
labgrade,
Yes steel is reputed to have a shorter shot string by many of those who should know. The shorter shot string is a benefit as all the shot arives in the pattern at about the same time. This means that you get more of the pattern that you see on the patterning board. When you have a longer shot string you may get an extra target or so from a target ariving late and being hit by a lagard pellet, but this is doubtful. First most misses are behind and the lagard pellets will be even farther behind. Secondly, elongating the pattern that you see on the pattern board means that the target or bird will be traveling slightly diagonally through the shot swarm. This means that there are bigger holes in your pattern than t he pattern board would indicate. And lastly pellets that are trailing the majority of the swarm are loosing velocity and energy rapidly and do not carry the same energy of those in the swarm. This means that these slow pellets if on target may not do their job. They will probably have not energy to break a clay or achieve lethal penetration on game. Does this mean that I like steel better than lead??? ABSOULTELY NOT!!! The added energy of lead or the heavy Non-toxics more than make up for the slightly lengthened shot string. At anything over skeet distances (20-25 yards) added density pays off in killing power. Chuck Graber |
January 26, 2002, 04:06 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
I actually found this on the Pattern Master choke tube website, Http://www.patternmaster.com . I'm in no way in leauge with Pattern master, but this does talk about shot strings and that a shorter one not only hits more, but more deadly also as Chuck commented.
Quote:
Sincerely, Adam
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
|
January 26, 2002, 06:58 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 29, 1999
Location: rural Illinois
Posts: 590
|
Shot strings don't matter...
...if the duck is flying straight at you.
These are some pretty good explanations of shot stringing but how can you tell how long your shot column is? some kind of pattern board moving laterally at a known rate of speed? Can different wad designs do as much as a patternmaster or other expensive tube? |
January 26, 2002, 09:51 PM | #6 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
|
I stand corrected. Thinking about it all makes sense, but didn't intuitively (at first).
Still, steel ain't as good as lead. |
January 27, 2002, 01:43 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
I've got no clue exactly how they measure shot string. I always just figured they used a camera that is constantly taking pictures at a high rate of speed. But then agian your patterning board guess is just as good as mine.
On wads, I've never heard of that, but it has been said that you can adjust your distance quite easily with them. Thicker or thinner than usual petals will add on to the the constriction of the choke. Not something I've tried but certainly a well founded theory. Sincerely, Adam
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
January 27, 2002, 08:21 AM | #8 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
|
Thicker wad petals run into pressure probs PDQ. With steel(My least favorite shot material) having zero compression, more bridging at the choke could result in a bad case of blunderbuss muzzle or your choke tube getting added to the ejecta.
Shot strings can be tuned a bit by powder selection, just like lead shot can. But, there's limits, and that part in the letter about taking 60 yard shots hikes my BP no end. One reason I do less waterfowling than in days of yore is the fact that often I have to hit a goose twice to ensure a clean kill, and that's at ranges way closer than 60 #$%^&* yards. To ensure clean hits and humane kills with few to no cripples with steel, take close shots with big pellets and practice like H*ll. Do that and the shot string will take care of itself... |
January 27, 2002, 08:58 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 74
|
Some more thoughts
Adamantium and Dave McC,
I believe that you are looking at the equation wrong. Choke is the difference between the standard bore diameter and the constricted part of the choke. The thickness of the wad petals should have no effect on shot performance EXCEPT that plastic is softer than lead shot and even more so than steel shot. Pick up any spent wad and you will see the shot cup dimpled by even the softest shot. The thicker petals would actually cushion the shot columns journey through the choke portion of the barrel and could even slightly make for a more open choke pattern. Dave, I would suggest that you try some of the new non-toxics. I have found that I shoot fewer shells when I use tungsten-matrix shells. They reach out farther and hit harder. I firmly believe that #1 TM is significantly more lethal than stee in BBB or even T sizes. Chuck Graber |
January 27, 2002, 09:43 AM | #10 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
|
Chuck, part of the pattern size is determined by how long/much the wad is delayed when it hits the choke. Full choke delays it longer, Cylinder much less. A wad that just blows through the choke bumps the shot from the rear and scatters it, thus openingthe pattern.It's not just constriction, tho that's a major player here.
Zutz explains it better than I can, check out his book,Shotgun Stuff,for some really esoteric stuff on patterns, chokes and loads. However, getting good patterns is still somewhat arcane.An art rather than science. Petal dimensions do affect patterns, IMO, but usually not enough to be noticed,UNLESS pressure gets too high. |
January 28, 2002, 08:29 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 74
|
Pressure Problems
Dave,
I agree with you on the subject of choke performance, but I still don't see where a thicker wad petal will cause pressure problems and I would suggest that the softer plastic material would tend to prevent steel shot bridging at the choke area as it is much softer than steel and can compress to allow the steel pellets to shift or squeeze through. A thinner petal will not be able to absorb as much compression. Chuck Graber |
January 29, 2002, 12:39 AM | #12 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
|
The "intuitive" part that got me was the timing of the string itself.
A longer string would seem to allow more flight time of the target through the string, but, when measured in milliseconds, I guess it's a moot point. Theoretically substantial, I'd suppose, but not in practicality .... & I know nuttin' 'bout thicker shot cups. Bit more to "just a shotgun" than would appear at first glance, no? |
January 29, 2002, 01:53 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
Good point Labgrade, I finally worked out the numbers of shot string time of target. I just picked 600 FPS as a speed, which is a little low but still realistic. If you had one shot string that was 20 ft. long it would pass a target in just over .036 of a second. Very fast for a long shot string of slow moving slot.
Sincerely, Adam
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
January 29, 2002, 05:19 AM | #14 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
|
Chuck, let's just agree to disagree on this. I'm no engineer.
The trouble with long shot strings can be summed up in one word. Density. The longer the string is, the less shot in any one section of it. I doubt it makes a difference at skeet ranges, even the usual distance for quail. But, out past 30 yards, a long string with holes here and there oft means a lost clay, or a slow and painful death for a living critter. I like nice thick, dense patterns. |
January 29, 2002, 06:47 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 74
|
Dave,
Agreed, The ideal pattern is a flying pancake. Proper width and very short shot string. The longer a shot string is the easier it is for a clay or bird to find a clear path through it and remain unscathed. Chuck Graber |
|
|