|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 26, 2016, 06:46 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2015
Location: Cottleville, Missouri
Posts: 1,115
|
USPSTF recommends depression screening for all adults....
... color me a bit paranoid in our present climate of trying to effectively incorporate mental health issues into the NICS, but this makes me a little uneasy when I consider where it could lead.
http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskf...sion-in-adults
__________________
Vegetarian... primitive word for lousy hunter! |
January 26, 2016, 08:38 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
Here's the test -- with the score sheet.
http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/im...0Questions.pdf IMHO you'd have to be pretty far over the edge to check even a "1" for any of the questions. There's no choice for "once or twice" -- it's for a two week period, and the choices jump from "not at all" to "several days." To me, "several" means generally more than three and fewer than ten, so if my real answer to one of the questions is "once," I can't answer. So which one am I going to pick? Well, knowing they're gunning for my guns, I'm going straight down the zero column, and have a nice day, Doctor. [Edit]Let me rephrase that: "One" = one "Two" = two ("a couple") "A few" = three to five "Several" = six to ten "Many" = more than ten Last edited by Aguila Blanca; January 26, 2016 at 08:46 PM. |
January 26, 2016, 08:52 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Cheer up ! Think of all the unsung social workers who will at last be recognized for their yeoman work in public safety. Did I mention they will probably get paid a lot of money for doing this?
They could have demeaning jobs working in asylums dealing with the criminally insane, but this kind of proactive approach to public mental health is going to keep them mainstream and appreciated. |
January 26, 2016, 10:31 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
It seems pretty rigged to me. Not to mention that it appears to be developed by one of the largest anti-depression drug companies in the world. No conflict there I'm sure.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
January 26, 2016, 10:34 PM | #5 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
Quote:
SO, ok, based on your answers to loaded questions. they decide you are depressed. NOW WHAT? (concerning gun rights, or even concerning your legal right to refuse treatment?????)
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
January 27, 2016, 03:54 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,435
|
Unfortunately, some of the questions fail to take into account other factors that might cause the symptoms. For example, I could probably score a 1 or 2 on questions 3, 4, 5, and 7 not because I'm depressed, but because I've been working night shift for the last four months (giving me insomnia) and I've been fighting a particularly nasty cold.
|
January 27, 2016, 05:48 AM | #7 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's actually a pretty standard assessment, and the scoring is pretty standard compared to others I have seen. Mental health assessments are not discrete tools. It's a comprehensive look at the person, the stressors, the symptoms, and the environment. Yes, there are certain benchmarks that we look at, but even then the circumstances make a huge difference. It's not a black and white, score this much for this result, type of tool. It's a guide. |
|||
January 28, 2016, 08:32 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
|
JimmyR I have great respect for your profession and I am sure there are many here that feel the same. The problem is identifying folks who may have some mental health issues while not adequately treating those who are currently suffering from mental illness is a waste of resources. Yes, it may help a few and it certainly will be good for those involved in the manufacturing and distribution of psychotropic drugs, but it will do little to improve national mental health. The potential for abuse, especially by those looking to remove/control guns scares me.
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin |
January 28, 2016, 08:48 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2015
Location: Cottleville, Missouri
Posts: 1,115
|
Quote:
__________________
Vegetarian... primitive word for lousy hunter! |
|
January 29, 2016, 02:38 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
1. A physician may be required to administer, but that doesn't mean you have to answer.
2. Everyone is depressed sometimes, and for a whole lot of different reasons. 3. Simply being depressed is not currently and should not be grounds for denying access to firearms. The standard in most places is "danger to one's self or others," which is sufficiently high to subject a person to detention for evaluation and treatment, and possible involuntary detention. That is good enough to seize firearms, especially if the threat is to others, but this does not mean that this should result in a lifetime ban, as current federal law provides. People do get better. |
January 29, 2016, 06:17 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2015
Location: Cottleville, Missouri
Posts: 1,115
|
I'll say again...
Quote:
__________________
Vegetarian... primitive word for lousy hunter! |
|
January 29, 2016, 06:33 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Anyone noticed on this "test" copyrighted by Pfizer that "fidgety" is misspelled as "figety?" Very professional...
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE |
January 29, 2016, 06:50 PM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
Quote:
You'd think Pfizer would at least have spelled it "pfidgety" (or "pfigety"). |
|
January 31, 2016, 11:22 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
The risk of such screening is when state laws may use such to mandate sanctions against the gun owner.
The NY SAFE act is an example: http://www.nyspsych.org/index.php?op...act&Itemid=140 NY has had about 38K reports and permits have been withdrawn: http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.s...ave_weapo.html It is an empirical question if 38K were truly risks. Or is it over-reporting to avoid liability and legal issues.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
January 31, 2016, 07:59 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
Really? So if I get winter blues in late December and tend to sleepmore than usual, eat a lot of carbs, and feel tired or slow (assuming I mark off 2s on those), it's enough to qualify me with a major depressive disorder (5 checkmarks) if I answer honestly? How many people don't go through some period in their life where they don't feel some way that would qualify them on this test? I'm far from a mental health expert, but that seems a little odd to me.
__________________
Certified Gunsmith (On Hiatus) Certified Armorer - H&K and Glock Among Others You can find my writings at my website, pottsprecision.com. |
January 31, 2016, 09:06 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
While I could link to the article, I could not get the test, so I don't know exactly what the questions are...(my computer said security settings prevent download- so either my computer is paranoid, or perhaps it is just too depressed to get the file...)
I don't need to see the actual questions, however, I know the kind they are, and here is the problem, anything based on a standardized test can be inaccurate, simply because we are NOT standardized individuals. In some ways it is like the standard for alcohol impairment. They set a numerical limit, and once you hit it, you are legally impaired, no matter whether you are actually physically impaired or not. Likewise, some individuals will be significantly impaired well below the set legal limit. I have issues with any "diagnosis" based only on arbitrary standards, and I REALLY have a issue with using that for any LEGAL decisions. Seriously, what is the ultimate risk here, isn't it being deprived of your rights (and property) simply because your lifestyle doesn't meet their standards for what is right and proper?? Am I actually going to be punished for not being "happy enough"??? seems like this might be a possibility.... anybody else here remember when doctors main efforts were fixing broken bones and treating disease, not trying to get us to lead "better, healthier lives"? I do.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
January 31, 2016, 09:48 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
44 AMP, there are 9 questions with 4 responses. 0 being "Never feel that way", 1 being "a couple days out of the last two weeks", 3 being "ever day/nearly every day".
The questions are things like "little interest or pleasure in doing things", "difficulty sleeping or sleeping too much", "feeling down", "having low energy" and go all the way up to "thoughts you would be better off dead"
__________________
Certified Gunsmith (On Hiatus) Certified Armorer - H&K and Glock Among Others You can find my writings at my website, pottsprecision.com. |
January 31, 2016, 11:59 PM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
The questionnaire is to cover the past two weeks. The four possible answer categories are:
Not at allSo ... what happens if you felt a little sad ONE day? Like maybe because you saw a little girl's puppy get run over on your way to work in the morning. They hit me with this periodically at the VA hospital. I know what they're after -- I've been home from Vietnam for 47 years, but they'd love to diagnose me with PTSD, because that's the hot button these days, and if they can diagnose more cases they can get more money for treating it. And if I get diagnosed as having PTSD, I get reported to NICS. I don't care how down I might feel on any given day, the answer to all questions is "Not at all." Last edited by Aguila Blanca; February 1, 2016 at 03:13 PM. |
February 1, 2016, 01:16 AM | #19 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
Quote:
I think the reporting to NICS is a fairly recent thing, but their history of mis and malfeasance of care is long and legendary. As far as I'm concerned, VA medicine is proof that Muphy was an optimist. And now, this excellent care model is being recommended to us (we will be forced, later, unless something changes) by our all knowing, caring, infallible government... (yes Virginia, that is sarcasm...)
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
February 1, 2016, 08:20 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2015
Location: NE Tennessee, a "Free State"
Posts: 476
|
I agree with Aquila Blanca. I get this "questionnaire" about twice a year at the VA. I ,too, do not trust their motives. So as "depressed" as I am I just answer with "zero's"! However; do NOT interpret this as mediocre care from the VA. For my true health care needs they perform quite adequately.
|
February 1, 2016, 11:05 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
For most people, most depression goes away after a while, as do the other 90% of mental health issues we all face as we go through life.
So answering 'None' on a questionnaire like this is perfectly alright, it's the first step to take in dealing with the issue anyway. |
February 1, 2016, 12:52 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
From the form questionnaire & the score sheet it seems biased.
Examples: All of the responses are multiple choice only. The choices are (in the last 14 days) Not at all =0 Several days = 1 More than 1/2 the days = 2 Nearly every day = 3 where is "Only one or two"? The questions presuppose an issue & are ambiguous as well. For example if you ONLY answer the lowest possible response to question 5 (Poor appetite or over eating, no "light snacked because of an upset stomach on one day" response is possible) as the lowest response "Several days" you score a 1 (out of a possible 27), you're in a state of depression. The test now only qualifies HOW depressed you are, not if you are depressed. In the final scores section there are 5 possible scores. The lowest possible (except for perfect "0") are all some severity of depression. There is no "Normal, not depressed" answer or score possible.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” Last edited by wogpotter; February 1, 2016 at 12:59 PM. |
February 1, 2016, 05:21 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2015
Location: Cottleville, Missouri
Posts: 1,115
|
Lets just hope that this never amounts to more than a recommendation.
__________________
Vegetarian... primitive word for lousy hunter! |
February 1, 2016, 09:40 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Posts: 438
|
i have a question for those who use the VA. what forces you to answer those questions at all. why cant you just refuse or put not applicable if on paper. because someone asks me a question doesnt mean i have to answer it.
|
February 2, 2016, 06:19 AM | #25 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
Quote:
You, as the patient, have no control over what the providers put in your record at the VA. If you decline to fill out a "simple lifestyle assessment," they could put down that you are uncooperative, or they could put down that you are concealing a mental issue, or they could put down that on the basis of observation they believe you have PTSD. The point is, who knows what they might write? Why take the chance, when it's easy to just circle all the zero answers and hand in the paper? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|