May 24, 2007, 02:25 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Posts: 59
|
Elk
I have a quick question is a 30-30 with leveroution good enough to hunt elk with in colorado? It more about shot placement then anything.
|
May 24, 2007, 02:30 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,716
|
it'll do the job at shorter ranges, and countless elk have fallen to the .30-30.
If I was on an elk hunt I would choose something with more oomph than a .30-30....just my 2 cents
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. |
May 24, 2007, 03:21 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Like he said, with a 30-30 you'd have to get close to make it count. But a 270 or 30-06 will do the job just fine, too.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
May 24, 2007, 05:57 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
The .30-30 is very capable of taking elk. My 2 cents keep your shots less than 150 yards and you should do just fine. Use the heaviest bullet that shoots well out of your .30-30 minimum of 150 grains, I wouldn't go any lighter. Be patient and wait for the perfect shot hopefully a full broadside or quartering away, so you don't have to try and punch through heavy bone to get at the vitals. Keep shooting until the animal is down.
|
May 24, 2007, 07:32 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2007
Location: GREEN COUNTRY,OKLAHOMA
Posts: 517
|
Since the 30-30 was the first modern "small bore" sporting rifle cartridge designed for smokeless powder, 1895, I would imagine a lot of elk have been taken with this round. With all the new hot rods, the 30-30 would be used much less these days. I've never been elk hunting, when i do i'll not hunt with a 30-30, but if that was all i had to shoot, a heavy bullet and close range, in my 2 cent world, would not seem to be a problem. I've knocked down some nice whitetails with it!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.30-30_Winchester
__________________
Pro Gun = Vote |
May 25, 2007, 09:47 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,976
|
This bull weighs approx. 750 lbs which is considerably more massive than deer. Elk ribs and hide are thicker; their muscles are deeper. In short, the old 30-30 is adequate when distance and shooting angle is carefully considered. But its a poor choice for less-than-ideal conditions. Good hunting to you. Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release. |
May 25, 2007, 05:33 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2006
Posts: 694
|
the 7.62x39 round (original AK-47 round) is usually compared to the 30-30 in terms of power. yet when mentioning deer hunting w/ the 7.62x39 people say its marginal, i've never even heard of anyone mention it in the same sentance as elk. yet some how the 30-30 is considered the low end, but still usable on elk?
Is there some ballistics i'm missing or is it just a bias type thing. |
May 25, 2007, 07:52 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Posts: 2,745
|
Well, the .30-30 normally does have a power edge over the 7.62x39, even if it's not huge (about 10% if I recall), and also with the .30-30 being a game cartridge and the 7.62x39 being an antipersonnel cartridge, there are offered more game bullets for the .30-30: 170gr soft points, 150gr Barnes X-bullets, 170gr Hawk Flat Nose, 170gr Nosler Partition, etc... these kinds of heavy, limited expansion rounds will offer deeper penetration than the 125gr hollowpoints that are standard 7.62x39mm fare.
__________________
“Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.” Niels Bohr |
|
|