July 25, 2011, 04:06 PM | #726 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
If guns are being illegally exported....does DHS gain some measures of Patriot Act authority they don't have normally, that they currently consider important...enough to insure that guns are continually being exported, so they can retain that authority?
If a straw sale is allowed to proceed, does anyone gain access to store records they wouldn't normally have, or do they have that authority already...with no evidence of any straw purchase? In other words, are perpetual straw purchases, followed by the supposed illegal exporting of same weapons, ancillary toward maintaining some continual effort, and that effort's required legal authority...rendering stories of drugs, felons, borders, murders etc. almost an undesirable, yet necessary side effect? Has the long gun reporting act(and possibly more) been in effect much longer than anyone thought?
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by alloy; July 25, 2011 at 04:59 PM. |
|
July 25, 2011, 04:22 PM | #727 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
|
|
July 25, 2011, 04:58 PM | #728 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
Quote:
My answer is: Of course. If DHS can claim exigent circumstances along the border due to higher levels of muder, kidnappings, shootings and general mayhem it could lead to expanded authority or new laws allowing them to seize people or property based on otherwise legal behavior. We've already seen some of this with CBP (customs & border protection) claiming that they can seize your property if you try to cross the border with a "large sum" of cash. What defines large sum is nebulous and probably varies to allow "discretion" on the part of CBP agents. They could expand that authority to people travelling "near" the border (where near is also nebulous). Even today, it doesn't take much to imagine a nightmare scene. Suppose three Americans of Hispanic heritage decide to drive from Brownsville over to New Mexico or Arizona for a 3-gun match. When authorities stop them and uncover the 9, 10 or 12 firearms and ammo in the vehicle, I doubt it will be end well. If DHS is involved, I doubt they'll see their guns returned without legal assistance and a lot of sweat and treasure expended.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
|
July 25, 2011, 05:00 PM | #729 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
I edited my post again....sorry
I'm curious if the laws can be logically backed thru so that the end justifies the means. Has the long gun reporting act(and possibly more) been in effect much longer than anyone thought?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
July 25, 2011, 05:12 PM | #730 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
Strange days I guess.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
July 25, 2011, 05:17 PM | #731 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
BillCA....sorry, but I'm not sure what I'm asking because I don't know how these laws or the FFL business flows.
Quote:
If a sale to a known or suspected felon is allowed to go thru, because it might be illegally exported, does one agency then have claim to usurp all the records of the other agency? For instance 4473s. Could a comprehensive list be compiled over time under the umbrella of Nat Security? As an aside, Todd Tiahrt was interviewed on Fox news a few days ago, he suggests Fast and Furious was designed to(among other things) aid in the repeal the Tiahrt amendment. What would they do over there at ATF? Would they be needed anymore, I wonder.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by alloy; July 25, 2011 at 05:49 PM. |
||
July 25, 2011, 05:49 PM | #732 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
However, there's little concern about access to 4473's being used as a registry. For the most part, the only time a gun is specifically reported to the ATF is in conjunction with a multiple-handgun sale form. Otherwise, the records are kept by the dealer. The very system dealers use makes it very hard to simply find John Smith's guns. Dealers' books are organized by the date the gun was received. For example, the acquisition log will show something like this: 07/25/2011 / Glock / 19 / 9mm / RAB455 / Glock USA, Smyrna, Ga. 07/26/2011 / S&W / 686 / .357 / CEB123 / AcuSport, Bellefontaine, Oh. When each gun is sold, the dealer fills out the customer's information in the "disposition" column. However, the books are organized by acquisition, so the only real way to audit them is by the date the guns were received. Essentially, there's no quick way to look at the dealer's records and determine which guns John Smith bought. I'd have to go down the list, line by line, and depending on how long the dealer's been in business, that could be tens of thousands of entries. And that assumes the dealer is still in business. If not, the books (and the forms) get boxed up and sent to an ATF warehouse, in which there are tens of millions of entries to consider. Assuming the ATF has a complete cache of those records, it's still a nightmare to track anything down because they're prohibited by both law and logistics from collating those records into any kind of database. An de facto registry won't come from that infrastructure. It would have to entail a whole new reporting system, and even then, the registry would only be accurate from the date of inception. Guns bought before then wouldn't be in it. Now, a new reporting requirement (like the one they tried in the border states) could force the registry of some weapons, but I think that could be proven to be a violation of the Tiahrt Amendment.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 25, 2011, 05:53 PM | #733 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
It's over my head but I see the pieces. Thanks guys!
__________________
Quote:
|
||
July 25, 2011, 06:58 PM | #734 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Tom, I think the risk might be more profound than you are acknowledging. Yes, if one were manually searching the 4473's of individual mom and pop gun shops, it would be problematic to create a comprehensive registry of guns by owner.
But a list need not be comprehensive to be dangerous. And you can get pretty damn near comprehensive if you just go after the big shops that sell hundreds of firearms a month. And you don't have to manually record these transactions if you copy the 4473's and pay some contract employees $12/hr to type each one into an Oracle database (in contravention of federal law, but it certainly doesn't appear that BATF is paying much attention to that these days!). This has all the shape, form and function of a prototype - a pilot program that is being tested for eventual deployment nationwide. No, they can't compile a perfect list with this approach - but they can certainly cast a broad net. |
July 25, 2011, 06:59 PM | #735 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2000
Location: SLC,Utah
Posts: 2,704
|
Quote:
|
|
July 25, 2011, 07:29 PM | #736 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by alloy; July 25, 2011 at 07:52 PM. Reason: spelling |
||
July 25, 2011, 07:36 PM | #737 |
Member
Join Date: April 11, 2010
Posts: 45
|
csmsss said:
"And you don't have to manually record these transactions if you copy the 4473's and pay some contract employees $12/hr to type each one into an Oracle database (in contravention of federal law, but it certainly doesn't appear that BATF is paying much attention to that these days!). "This has all the shape, form and function of a prototype - a pilot program that is being tested for eventual deployment nationwide. No, they can't compile a perfect list with this approach - but they can certainly cast a broad net." I believe you are on to something here. This is an agency that has been notorious for playing fast and loose with the rules. ...er put less charitably, they violate the law as a standard way of doing business. Nebulous practices, gray areas of the law, exigent circumstances, bend the rules to attain a desired result and on and on. I suspect that many folks, including members of this very forum have allowed themselves to believe that agents of government are acting with the best interests of the people in mind. Me? Not so much. If this scandal does nothing else but open up the eyes of those willfully ignorant citizens then it will have served some positive purpose. That is at the minimum. I hope for greater results than that. To include; criminal prosecutions of those involved, jail sentences and loss of pension for those convicted of criminal wrong-doing, an end to the ATF (I'm sure I am dreaming), removal from office of Holder, no hope for re-election of Obama and eternal shame for many of his Chicago cronies. That list would be a nice start. What can I say? I think big. |
July 25, 2011, 08:50 PM | #738 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
As far as typing in hundreds of millions of 4473's, imagine the time and payroll. I'm not saying it isn't possible, but it seems like a great deal of effort for a very meager result.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 25, 2011, 09:07 PM | #739 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2009
Location: Frozen Tundra
Posts: 2,414
|
Quote:
__________________
Molon Labe |
|
July 25, 2011, 09:24 PM | #740 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 7, 2008
Posts: 151
|
Someone needs to remind Faux News that long gun sales don't go through NICS.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk |
July 25, 2011, 09:27 PM | #741 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 25, 2011, 09:31 PM | #742 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2010
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,293
|
As someone who is only in his mid 20's I must sit back and think this is what my parents experienced during Watergate. Mind you the media climate was already rather harsh towards Nixon, It is this type of once in a generation moment where such gross misconduct by the government comes to light. I think I just might be telling my kids about this in 15 or 20 years.
|
July 26, 2011, 05:24 AM | #743 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
|
Foxnews has an article this morning detailing how top washington atf officials as well as others in washington knew of walked guns since atleast 2009 according to transcripts of meetings, as well as high level atf agents in houston la and other towns. I will believe the article and think it still goes deeper.
http://www.foxnews.mobi/#r_http%3A//...26pageNum%3D-1 |
July 26, 2011, 08:52 AM | #744 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: North Mississippi
Posts: 854
|
This was released by Senators Issa and Grassley a few moments ago.
http://1.usa.gov/pgDHg9 There is a lot of info there to sort through. |
July 26, 2011, 09:13 AM | #745 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|
July 26, 2011, 09:28 AM | #746 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
|
July 26, 2011, 09:39 AM | #747 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
WTH??? Did everyone lose stream signal?
Brent |
July 26, 2011, 10:32 AM | #748 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
Word Of The Day...
SHELLACKING
As I watch... I applaud the folks on the oversight committee. It seems I never gave this procedure due credit. I thought for sure some would be trying to "soften" the blows to the witness panel. I am impressed! Brent |
July 26, 2011, 11:29 AM | #749 | |||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,057
|
While I'm still waiting on a transcript from the Melson interviews, there's a great deal of alarming, credible evidence here.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|||
July 26, 2011, 01:28 PM | #750 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Can't wait to see the transcript for this; but it looks like Newell is getting roasted alive. And apparently Newel briefed Kevin O'Reilly (going on memory, may have mangled last name) with the National Security Council (i.e. White House) on Fast and Furious some time ago.
Apparently, the Committee has an email from Newell to O'Reilly with Newell saying "You didn't get this from me..." Wonder if Newell was surprised to learn that today? I'm getting the idea that the Oversight Committee has quite a bit of its own information that DOJ is unaware of Looks like McMahon is angling to be the designated fall guy, though how he is going to be the fall guy when people higher than him have already admitted knowledge of the program, I'm not real sure. |
Tags |
atf , fast and furious |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|