April 23, 2018, 06:42 AM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
"trainers"
One of my pet peeves are those "dudes" who do "training classes" for shooters. I was chatting with a guy a while back and concealed carry came up. He told he had several years in the Marine Corps, had been a county Deputy for almost a decade, and he and 3 friends gave "training classes" during summer months.
OK. First off, being a Marine doesn't automatically qualify anyone for civilian concealed weapons use. Second, I knew some guys from that county Sheriff's department and most of them got canned for improprieties involving female prisoners. Third, after we'd discussed different carry strategies, the guy asked to see my Crimson Trace gripped Ruger SP101. He grabbed onto it like it was trying to attack him and fumbled it around a bit before finding the laser button. Then he turned the muzzle toward himself to look into the laser beam. I stopped him before he got that far reminding him the laser could damage his eyes and the revolver WAS STILL LOADED. I'd already told him this once and he watched me take it out of my holster so being loaded wasn't a secret. Now some will admonish me for handing a loaded gun to another person but this guy claimed to be an expert(but obviously wasn't quite). My point is:this "DUDE" was "training" others but wasn't even capable himself. |
April 23, 2018, 08:12 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: October 27, 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 40
|
What's the old saying..."If can, do. If you can't, teach."
|
April 23, 2018, 11:02 AM | #3 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
You will know a good trainer.
We all know folks whose priority is to tell you how qualified they are. A truly credible person, will show it. I recently completed an NRA's (RSO) training and this guy was a real pro and you could see it, right off. ......
Quote:
I have never attended a bad training class, just some better than others. .. Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
||
April 23, 2018, 01:51 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
|
Check out their credentials if you can.
"Military experience"? Army, in my case, most people in the Army are support and rear echelon types, and even in combat units you meet very few gun guys and the Army in my day (1967-1971) did a poor job of firearms training. |
April 23, 2018, 09:29 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
If my choice is a former Soldier /LEO or a training junkie who is essentially a tactical parrot with zero practical experience. I would not hesitate to select the former. If a person has never carried a firearm occupationally and has never had the occasion to confront danger while armed, they wont be training me in matters of self defense, tactics or strategics.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
April 24, 2018, 06:30 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
More thoughts: Since I've held a CCW permit and carried a concealed defensive handgun for nearly as long as the mentioned "Dude" has served in both military and county LEO, would I not be more qualified to be a CCW "trainer"?
Really, how does uniformed military service or LEO actually teach one ANYTHING about carrying a concealed weapon? In fact, I still shoot(train) more frequently than our county Sheriff's department. They "qualify"(which means they go to a range and toe the line to shoot paper) with their toys ONCE A YEAR. Quite possibly those individuals have NEVER shot at another human or been shot at in those years of service. They THINK they know how to or how they will react but have never actually owned that experience. |
April 24, 2018, 08:28 AM | #7 | |||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
There are a number of LEOs who have been extensively trained, however. Quote:
Quote:
The best trainers for practical defensive shooting (1) can handle a handgun proficiently; (2) Have worked with their peers to understand the realities of defensive shooting and the variables involved, including the psychological and physical aspects; (3) know something about the science of teaching; (4) have tried out their tactics and skills in shoot house scenarios and FoF training; and (5) have put that all to use in doing some actual teaching. Some experience in competition would not hurt, provided that the instructor knows the significant shortcomings. |
|||
April 24, 2018, 09:07 AM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
I suppose if the "trainee" feels more confident and/or learns something, that's the important thing.
I received my OJT from men who were shot at and shot back on a nearly daily basis. This background makes me far more skeptical of the "stuff" I see done under the premise of "training". I'm done, having said more than I probably should. |
April 24, 2018, 10:11 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 350
|
Any doofus can call themselves a "trainer." And about half of them do, it seems.
And don't get me started on NRA trainer cert credentialism. "I'm a NRA-certified trainer in so many things, I wallpapered by master bathroom with NRA certificates!" I don't have the answer to avoiding boar's teats trainers. Reputation is about all you can go on, and sometimes even that is artificial. The upside is that most folks don't need a particularly knowledgeable or capable trainer to manage the basics: safe gun handling, hit-the-paper marksmanship, basic concealed carry.
__________________
Regards, jfruser "Books and bullets have their own destinies."----Bob Ross |
April 24, 2018, 10:43 AM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
They are necessary, but not sufficient. |
|
April 24, 2018, 11:08 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
T
Quote:
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
|
April 24, 2018, 11:11 AM | #12 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Quote:
Now have you concluded that, based on this one trainer who you concluded was unqualified, everyone who does classes for shooters is unqualified?
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||
April 24, 2018, 11:17 AM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
So let's end this thread and let it fade into well deserved oblivion.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
April 24, 2018, 09:07 PM | #14 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,838
|
A person with training does not make that person a teacher. I've attended several instructor classes and was taught to design and implement a lesson plan. I've also benefitted from observing how others instruct.
I make trainees take baby steps and build their knowledge, safety, competence, and handling long before they even step onto the firing line. It also ensures that there is good communication between myself and the students so I don't get shot.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
|
|