The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 2, 2017, 10:29 PM   #1
Tinbucket
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2015
Posts: 355
Speed Loading a Cap and Ball

I have couple of cap and ball revolvers.
There is no such thing as speed loading one, of these is there?
I have CVA Capper which like to shuck primers some times, and a bit difficult getting caps seated at times.
A long time ago when I had another muzzle loader, I made cartridges by soaking onion skin paper in whatever the stuff is. Brain freeze. I 'm tired.
I got varying results. Used thin coat of Elmers to stick the cartridges together, not the best idea and made them more narrow than the chamber. United the end of cartridge. Using the rammer to seat ball on to pof two lubed felt wads ruptured the remainder.
I don't believe it was any faster.
Of course some of our Ancestors carried two or more loaded cylinders.
Always wondered about the caps staying on and charge not rattling out.
Anyone "speed load" or extra loaded cylinders?
Tinbucket is offline  
Old May 2, 2017, 11:10 PM   #2
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
The old timers carried extra cylinders for there caps and balls, especially the remy 58s. They use what is known as a "paper cartirdge" to reload cylinders but had spares for a fast reload when on the back of horse. The early Petterson revos had to use them, later they had the carts.
Model12Win is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 12:33 AM   #3
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,879
The speed load during the days of percussion caps and ball was the New York reload. Cavalry troops would often have more than one pistol because the horses could carry them. Bill Hickok carried two revolvers, not to shoot one in each hand.

Today, the 1858 and its easy to remove cylinder makes reloading cap and ball revolvers as fast as can be without having a second revolver and is the fastest reload you can get.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
TruthTellers is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 07:59 AM   #4
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Quote:
Of course some of our Ancestors carried two or more loaded cylinders.
Hawg is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 01:37 PM   #5
maillemaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
There is not much, if any, evidence to suggest that soldiers, at any rate, carried extra cylinders. There are no issue records that I am aware of.

Steve
maillemaker is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 03:17 PM   #6
Trum4n1208
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2013
Posts: 173
The only written record I've ever seen of a reload done by swapping cylinders was in reference to Texas Rangers using the Colt Paterson. It should be noted that this was before one could reload a Percussion revolver on the gun itself (ie. without disassembly).

Ignoring the aforementioned source, there's no primary sources suggesting it was done (at least in the military (that I know about, I'm not perfect and neither is my research)), and no battlefield finds that support the idea either. It could have been done by civilians, but would have required hand fitting. Given the abundance of military surplus revolvers in those days, I think the few people who would carry a revolver expecting to have to reload it in a fight would probably just buy a spare pistol. And keep in mind, the average person almost certainly wouldn't have needed that much firepower.

Last edited by Trum4n1208; May 3, 2017 at 03:31 PM.
Trum4n1208 is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 06:04 PM   #7
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Quote:
There is not much, if any, evidence to suggest that soldiers, at any rate, carried extra cylinders.
There is no record. No written record, no photographic record, no relic record. Nothing, nada, zip. There is a mountain of recorded material for carrying multiple revolvers.
Hawg is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 06:20 PM   #8
Centurion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Posts: 270
Totally agree
Centurion is online now  
Old May 3, 2017, 06:53 PM   #9
Bishop Creek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Posts: 564
I doubt if cylinder changes were done back in the 19th Century. Some, like Hickock, carried at least two revolvers for more than six shots, and some, like Jesse James carried four or more during the Civil War.
Bishop Creek is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 07:11 PM   #10
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
If people would just put some rational thought or at least do some research and quit trying to give people back then a modern mindset they would realize most of the stuff perpetuated by Hollyweird didn't happen or was very unlikely. I never heard of anyone swapping cylinders on a 58 until Eastwood did it in Pale Rider and after that it was all over the place.
Hawg is offline  
Old May 3, 2017, 08:32 PM   #11
Bishop Creek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Posts: 564
Quote:
If people would just put some rational thought or at least do some research and quit trying to give people back then a modern mindset they would realize most of the stuff perpetuated by Hollyweird didn't happen or was very unlikely. I never heard of anyone swapping cylinders on a 58 until Eastwood did it in Pale Rider and after that it was all over the place.
Me either Hawg.
Bishop Creek is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 10:23 AM   #12
Trum4n1208
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2013
Posts: 173
I actually think one of the more realistic depictions of a realistic "gunfighter" type of person in a movie was Clint Eastwood in "the Outlaw Josey Wales." One man carrying a large number of pistols, especially in the percussion era is WAY more historically accurate than the idea of someone swapping out an unloaded cylinder for a loaded one. That movie has its flaws of course, as do they all.

Having said that, the cylinder swapping scenes in "Pale Rider" or "Hell on Wheels" is about as cool as can be. Folks just need to remember that's all it is, and that it isn't historically accurate, at all.

Quote:
There is no record. No written record, no photographic record, no relic record. Nothing, nada, zip. There is a mountain of recorded material for carrying multiple revolvers.
I agree 100%. If it was done then someone somewhere would have mentioned it like they did the practice of carrying multiple pistols.
Trum4n1208 is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 11:09 AM   #13
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trum4n1208
I agree 100%. If it was done then someone somewhere would have mentioned it like they did the practice of carrying multiple pistols
+1 And that's all I have to say about that
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 11:32 AM   #14
noelf2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Stuart, VA
Posts: 2,473
Model12Win tripped the triggers.

Hey, I trust Clint Eastwood to let me know everything I need to know about the history of swapping cylinders !!!
__________________
Liberty and freedom often offends those who understand neither.
noelf2 is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 12:02 PM   #15
maillemaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
I did see someone post on facebook a few days ago a supposedly dug-condition revolver cylinder. Of course it doesn't mean it was a spare. But it was, supposedly, a dug cylinder.

Steve
maillemaker is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 12:47 PM   #16
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Quote:
I did see someone post on facebook a few days ago a supposedly dug-condition revolver cylinder. Of course it doesn't mean it was a spare. But it was, supposedly, a dug cylinder.
Dug condition revolvers are usually pretty fragile. Who's to say what happened to the rest of it over the years but if it were done there would be cylinders being dug up all over the place. I dug up a 92 Winchester sans butt plate. Does that mean it came without one?
Hawg is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 03:33 PM   #17
rodwhaincamo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
I'd have a VERY hard time believing that the only thing that made it was the cylinder alone, that the rest disintegrated. Wood is certainly a much different situation. One cylinder by itself certainly implies it was solo. But maybe it was removed from the gun and dropped there for whatever reason.

And I'm not pushing that spare cylinders were a thing then.
rodwhaincamo is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 03:45 PM   #18
rodwhaincamo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
Those who used the Patterson would have certainly understood the value in a swapped cylinder as a reload. Not many of those fighting in the Civil War I'd imagine though. But then to find spare cylinders buried you'd REALLY have to luck on them as they likely weren't common.

Not everyone could afford several handguns and going into war I'd suppose one would do whatever they could to give them an advantage.

And I'm sure this sounds as though I'm advocating for the use of spare cylinders, and maybe I am to an extremely small degree. Common? No. Done? Quite possibly.
rodwhaincamo is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 04:37 PM   #19
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Quote:
I'd have a VERY hard time believing that the only thing that made it was the cylinder alone, that the rest disintegrated.
I never said disintegrated. Most of the battlefields were farmland with over 150 years of farm machinery going over it. Places in battlefield parks like Gettysburg that have had archaeologists go over with metal detectors turned up no single cylinders that I know of.
Hawg is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 05:10 PM   #20
noelf2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Stuart, VA
Posts: 2,473
Well in the movies, when someone discards a gun, they take off the slide and toss pieces in opposite directions. Maybe that's what the did with revolvers back in the day too!

But also, when you fire off all five shots (because nobody loaded six for safety reasons), the cylinder becomes a pretty good weapon to throw at someone, and the rest makes a pretty good war hammer. Prolly why you just found the cylinder. . </troll>
__________________
Liberty and freedom often offends those who understand neither.
noelf2 is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 05:21 PM   #21
rodwhaincamo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
Hard to believe farm equipment separated it so far as well, especially as metal rusts together. Not that likely in my opinion, though I'm hardly a metallurgist. I don't buy that one, especially as farm equipment hasn't been that powerful for long.
rodwhaincamo is offline  
Old May 4, 2017, 05:53 PM   #22
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
You haven't dug up some of the stuff I have. Farm equipment drags stuff and beats stuff all to heck.
Hawg is offline  
Old May 5, 2017, 04:37 PM   #23
drobs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2015
Location: South Central MO / Africa
Posts: 1,111
Below is taken from:
http://www.civilwarhome.com/capballrevolver.html
Interesting read on carrying multiple revolvers (4+) per person / cavalryman.

Seems, high capacity was as big as an issue back then as it is now.

"Officers like partisan leader John Singleton Mosby believed the revolver was the ideal cavalryman's weapon. Countering the opinions of officers who argued that a saber was "always loaded," Mosby believed edged weapons were "of no use against gunpowder." Mosby's men, who favored the .44 Colt Model 1860 Army above all other revolvers, found rapid-fire handguns ideal for close range surprise charges on supply wagons or Federal patrols. James J. Williamson, one of Mosby's men, remembered that: "with us the fighting was mostly at close quarters and the revolver was then used with deadly effect." Many Yanks agreed with Mosby. A Federal officer wrote that his regiment "had never yet drawn the saber in a charge, and never would charge with anything but pistols."
Perhaps the most significant devotees of the six-gun during the Civil War were the irregular warriors of the Border States. In contrast to Mosby, whose men were enlisted in a recognized unit which had had a clear military purpose and value, Kentucky, Missouri and Arkansas guerillas, whether they professed loyalty to the Union or the Confederacy, were often little better than bandits - a trade many adopted as a postwar career. Like Mosby, however, the guerillas found six-guns ideal for ambushes, where a blizzard of bullets rapidly delivered at close range negated the range advantage of rifle-muskets or breech loading single shot carbines.
Men who relied on the revolver as a primary weapon often carried a number of them. Many of Mosby's troopers holstered two handguns on their belts and another two on their saddles. Rebel guerillas in Missouri outdid the Virginia partisans and often carried as many as five six-guns. In September, 1864, Federal soldiers in Missouri "killed six of ["Bloody Bill"] Anderson's gang, taking from their bodies 30 revolvers." Bloody Bill himself met his end shortly afterward, and the Yankees removed "four revolvers, two watches, and about $500 in gold and greenbacks" from his body. When another bushwacker, Bill Stewart, was killed by cattleman W. H. Busford, who he was attempting to rob: "four revolvers were taken from his person."
__________________
NRA Life Member
drobs is offline  
Old May 5, 2017, 05:08 PM   #24
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,487
I was assured by a reenactor* last week that he could change cylinders in his Remington on horseback. He admitted that he could find no example or description of a means to carry extra cylinders.

Changing cylinders on a Colt would be more problematical, since you would 1. have to free the wedge and 2. keep track of the separated barrel as well as the receiver and two cylinders.

* This was the same guy who said the 1859 Sharps could be fired ten times in ten seconds. When questioned, he confirmed, a round a second. I would grant you a round every ten seconds, maybe ten a minute under good conditions, but a shot a second was arrant nonsense.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old May 6, 2017, 07:32 AM   #25
Trum4n1208
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2013
Posts: 173
Quote:
I was assured by a reenactor* last week that he could change cylinders in his Remington on horseback. He admitted that he could find no example or description of a means to carry extra cylinders.
I'd bet money he couldn't do it under fire, at a hard gallop. A lot of folks seem to forget that doing this during a range trip or a horseback ride is significantly different than doing it during a firefight.

No criticism meant to you at all, Jim Watson. Hope it wasn't taken that way.
Trum4n1208 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07727 seconds with 8 queries