The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 24, 2017, 11:52 AM   #1
PP99
Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2013
Posts: 76
Your best striker fired pistol IF .357 sig/caliber

Any opinion is welcomed!
PP99 is offline  
Old June 24, 2017, 05:18 PM   #2
disseminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 477
M&P 40 with 357 SIG factory barrel.
disseminator is offline  
Old June 25, 2017, 09:44 AM   #3
Pikie
Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2002
Posts: 24
+1 on the M&P. I have an original Smith and Wesson M&P .357 Sig. It just feels better in my hands than the Glock. Smith & Wesson discontinued them because of the .40 S&W "craze". Now that statistics and history are showing the .40 to "not be quite as much as advertised" maybe there will be some re-interest in the .357 Sig. Only time will tell. It may end up to the semi auto word as the .41 Mag. did to the revolver world. It is still a fine cartridge if you can handle it.
Pikie is offline  
Old June 25, 2017, 10:20 AM   #4
lifesizepotato
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Posts: 178
Steyr M357A1. Great gun to begin with and the bore axis/grip angle work perfectly for the 357 SIG in my opinion.
lifesizepotato is offline  
Old June 25, 2017, 11:51 AM   #5
O4L
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 16, 2015
Posts: 451
My first 357 Sig and my first M&P experience was a M&P Compact.

I really liked the Compact and it was very accurate.

I later acquired a full size M&P in 357 Sig and was happy with it also.
O4L is offline  
Old June 25, 2017, 12:51 PM   #6
Ride Madone
Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2015
Posts: 77
I really like my H&K VP40 with a 357 Sig conversion barrel. It is my nightstand gun and because I use a VP9 almost daily, it feels right at home in my hand.

I had a P320 in 357 Sig for a while, but sold it because I had some feeding issues with it. When it worked it was a nice shooting gun.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Ride Madone is offline  
Old June 25, 2017, 04:29 PM   #7
dontcatchmany
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 19, 2010
Posts: 192
FNS 40 with a 357 sig barrel.

#2 is a glock 27 with a 357 sig barrel. But I needed 357 Sig magazines because the 40 magazines gave me problems with 357 Sig in them.

And right in the mix is an FNX 40 with a 357 sig barrel...hammer fired of course.
dontcatchmany is offline  
Old June 26, 2017, 07:47 AM   #8
CDW4ME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 851
I've got a Glock 31 & 32, like both.
The 31 is actually a Glock 22 with Lone Wolf 357 Sig barrel for Glock 31.
My 5 shot averages with 125 HST were 1,385 fps and 1,358 fps respectively.
__________________
If I have to defend my life, I'd prefer more than "better than nothing" in my hand.
CDW4ME is offline  
Old June 26, 2017, 01:24 PM   #9
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,522
I don't own a striker fired pistol.
pete2 is offline  
Old June 26, 2017, 01:28 PM   #10
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Western WA
Posts: 7,181
There really are eight people with striker-fired 357 SIGs?
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong.
RickB is offline  
Old June 26, 2017, 02:47 PM   #11
PP99
Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2013
Posts: 76
I don't like fishing.
PP99 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08464 seconds with 10 queries