The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 12, 2023, 10:25 AM   #26
stagpanther
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,230
I'm done with being on the bleeding edge (aka public testers) with new cartridges. Too much garbage hype and too much incremental updates to reamer specs while trying to get it right. Let someone else kaboom themselves. I'm going to wait at least two years after it's introduced before trying anything new.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill
I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk!
stagpanther is offline  
Old June 22, 2023, 06:39 AM   #27
Buckeye!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 835
6.5 Grendel is just a great round.. if u are a handloader … ammo just to expensive
Im a 7.62x39 .. has limitations.. as long as you know’em .. ur good to go
Buckeye! is offline  
Old June 22, 2023, 09:35 AM   #28
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,076
I also think the 5.56/.223 is as about general purpose as you can get out to 300. The cartridge is more capable than internet lore suggests.

Shorter or longer distances there may be other options.

What I’ve found is as you stray away from .223 you end up giving up something, be it:
Cost
Ammo capacity
Reliability
Ammo availability
Range
Etc
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!

Last edited by rickyrick; June 25, 2023 at 12:29 PM.
rickyrick is offline  
Old June 25, 2023, 08:41 AM   #29
Road_Clam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,691
300BO subs suppressed. NV equipped . "General purpose" all day long (and night)
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid"
Road_Clam is offline  
Old June 25, 2023, 10:17 AM   #30
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,788
Having just build a 6mm arc gun and having just shot it yesterday my perspective is shifting a bit. The main issue I have with it so far is ammo availability, or brass availability as I reload. 223/5.56 still has it beat hands down as far as availability goes. However I really like the way 6mm arc shoots and the extra energy and range it brings.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old June 25, 2023, 12:29 PM   #31
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,076
Just out of curiosity, how much bullet drop does subsonic 300bo have at 300yrds?

The OP wants to take game at 300yards.
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old June 25, 2023, 10:28 PM   #32
MTT TL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,759
300 yards hunting medium game will likely be better served with a 6.5 or 6.8 than 5.56. Either will work well at 300 yards. If you want to shoot farther, get the 6.5G with a longer barrel. Factory ammo is cheaper for the 6.5 if that matters.

Of course if you wanted to go with an AR-10 style the .277 Fury blows both of the others away with performance. With the AR-10 being a full size rifle as opposed to the lighter carbine.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war.
MTT TL is offline  
Old June 25, 2023, 11:53 PM   #33
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickyrick View Post
Just out of curiosity, how much bullet drop does subsonic 300bo have at 300yrds?

The OP wants to take game at 300yards.
About 15 feet. Flight time is about 1 sec.

The elevation on a m16 peep sight starts at 300yd and ends at 600yd. There must be some effectiveness even for the small .223, depending on your definition.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Last edited by tangolima; June 26, 2023 at 01:02 AM.
tangolima is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 02:13 AM   #34
stagpanther
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,230
Quote:
Having just build a 6mm arc gun and having just shot it yesterday my perspective is shifting a bit. The main issue I have with it so far is ammo availability, or brass availability as I reload. 223/5.56 still has it beat hands down as far as availability goes. However I really like the way 6mm arc shoots and the extra energy and range it brings.
I made my ARC brass from grendel brass, pretty straight-forward with nothing special other than watching for neck length growth and trimming it. I didn't have to do any neck turning. I have noticed that grendel brass has gone up in price (like everything else) but you can still find it--you can order it direct from starline if you don't won't to pay big bucks.The arc works well in an AR as well as bolt. If I was going bolt-only there are a few better alternatives--but it works very well in the AR but you might be limited in COL by the magazine (unless you do a front cut-out).
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill
I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk!

Last edited by stagpanther; June 26, 2023 at 08:46 AM.
stagpanther is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 11:23 AM   #35
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
If the OP is worried about an ethical / high probability kill at 300 yards, consider moving to a .308.
There are many quality components / complete rifles available that are 3/4 MOA or better with factory ammo.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 11:45 AM   #36
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXAZ View Post
If the OP is worried about an ethical / high probability kill at 300 yards, consider moving to a .308.
There are many quality components / complete rifles available that are 3/4 MOA or better with factory ammo.
Based on the numbers i have run, 6mm arc is generally good to between 350-500 yds, at 1800fps or more, which is generally the minimum expansion velocity for most hunting bullets
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 12:04 PM   #37
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,076
.223 does kill within the OPs range
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 04:47 PM   #38
MTT TL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,759
Quote:
.223 does kill within the OPs range
It does, but there are more effective options out there.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war.
MTT TL is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 05:59 PM   #39
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTT TL View Post
Of course if you wanted to go with an AR-10 style the .277 Fury blows both of the others away with performance.
We kind of don't know a lot of things about the .277 Fury. I know more now with a few fired cases on my desk. But for a hunting rifle, a .270Win does make A LOT more sense with a 24" barrel than 80Kpsi with a 16" barrel.

Oh, and the OP said AR15 pattern, so the 277Fury is not even eligible for consideration.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 06:09 PM   #40
MTT TL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,759
That is why I qualified that statement.

Not sure I would favor a 24" barrel AR for HD purposes. Just doesn't seem as handy.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war.
MTT TL is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 07:19 PM   #41
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,076
Quote:
It does, but there are more effective options out there.
I don’t disagree at all, but I’m looking at it from a do-all caliber point of view.

I tend to assemble components into purpose made ARs.

To restate my original opinion on the topic

Quote:
I also think the 5.56/.223 is as about general purpose as you can get out to 300. The cartridge is more capable than internet lore suggests.

Shorter or longer distances there may be other options.

What I’ve found is as you stray away from .223 you end up giving up something, be it:
Cost
Ammo capacity
Reliability
Ammo availability
Range
Etc
__________________
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 07:34 PM   #42
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,363
My first AR was a Grendel. 123SST in .3".
__________________
Reloading For: 223R, 243W, 6.5 GR, 6.5 CM, 260R, 6.5-06, 280R, 7mmRM, 300HAM'R, 308W, 30-06, 338-06, 9mm, 357M, 41M, 44SPL, 44M, 45 ACP, 45 Colt, 450BM.
GeauxTide is offline  
Old June 26, 2023, 08:07 PM   #43
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTT TL View Post
That is why I qualified that statement.

Not sure I would favor a 24" barrel AR for HD purposes. Just doesn't seem as handy.
AND, no way I'd pick the 16" 277 FURY for HD either.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old July 1, 2023, 08:31 AM   #44
wild willy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2006
Posts: 399
A couple years ago I would have said 6.8 SPC immediately but things have changed Sierra has discontinued bullets other bullets are impossible to get.The cheap overrun/surplus ammo is gone . I think the the 6.8 for my use is better than the 6.5 Grendel I have a fair amount of supplies for the 6.8 so I’m ok for a while but if I was buying one now it would probably be the 6.5
wild willy is offline  
Old July 7, 2023, 08:41 PM   #45
Maxx
Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 36
If you could only pick one caliber for general purpose in the criteria mentioned, seems to me .308 is the obvious answer. Reaches out quite a ways, drops medium game animals, and is easy to find.
Maxx is offline  
Old July 7, 2023, 08:50 PM   #46
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxx View Post
If you could only pick one caliber for general purpose in the criteria mentioned, seems to me .308 is the obvious answer. Reaches out quite a ways, drops medium game animals, and is easy to find.
But not available in an AR15, which the OP specified in the "criteria".
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old July 8, 2023, 09:15 AM   #47
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,973
I’m not sure what you guys mean about general purpose and the 223. It really isn’t great for pig hunting, which is why I have a Grendel now.
603Country is offline  
Old July 8, 2023, 10:01 AM   #48
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,076
For pigs, it depends on the range. I took 100s of pigs with .223. However, all of them were less than 100 yards and most within 50 yards. I’m not contradicting what 603country is saying either.
That being said I have different calibers for pigs now.
This is a tricky topic, but I still say that the best “all around” caliber AR is the .223/5.56.

Now if I wanted to nit-pick, then the chart posted in reply #9 shows that 6.8spc holds a slight edge over 6.5 Grendel. I have no way of knowing whether that information is accurate or not. However, im not finding a lot of 6.8spc factory ammunition as of late.
I think it depends on how the user wants to budget ammunition expenses In money or time.
My interpretation is that the OP is planning to through a significant number of rounds down range in practice and recreation.
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!!
rickyrick is offline  
Old July 8, 2023, 10:50 AM   #49
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,443
It is AR. The upper can be swapped very easily. I wouldn't confine myself to only one caliber. A combination of 2-3 complete uppers with associated magazines is what I would have.

But if I absolutely can have only one, I still pick .223 Wylde with 1:7 or 1:8 twist. I can handload with heavier bullets if I need expanded capabilities.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old July 8, 2023, 10:52 AM   #50
Pistoler0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2019
Location: Conifer, CO
Posts: 632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye! View Post
6.5 Grendel is just a great round.. if u are a handloader … ammo just to expensive
Im a 7.62x39 .. has limitations.. as long as you know’em .. ur good to go
yeah, I roll 7.62x39 with AR too, but not good for big game beyond 150-160 yards (falls below 1000 ft-lbs at that distance). But still nothing cheaper for factory ammo ($0.36 / round)

At $0.79/round for cheapest factory offering, 6.5 Grendel not outrageous.

[Prices per Ammoseek 7/8/2023 ]
__________________
Life is simply an inter-temporal problem of constrained optimization.

Last edited by Pistoler0; July 8, 2023 at 11:07 AM.
Pistoler0 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10362 seconds with 8 queries