The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting > Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 15, 2023, 10:37 AM   #1
PolarFBear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2015
Location: NE Tennessee, a "Free State"
Posts: 477
Question on Lead/tin ratio?

I've melted a lot of lead over 15 years. But, it just hit me on what that ratio thing is that Keith and the Lyman book talk about. Is the ratio of lead to tin measured in volume or weight? My method has never been precise. I just plop some linotype, pewter or tin into my wheel weight melt and it's all been good. I am a plinker, not into competition in any form. I DO use pure lead for my black powders.
PolarFBear is offline  
Old February 15, 2023, 04:19 PM   #2
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,060
It's the percent by weight. With all the awkward shapes different alloys come in, ingot shapes, wheel weight shapes, round shot shapes, and recovered bullet shapes, there's no simple way to measure by volume unless you want to take the time to do water displacement on everything. As a general rule, chemistry uses constituent weight to mix all solid material percentages. Fluids are done by volume if their constituent percentages are already known or if they are pure, in which case their molecular weights let you calculate the mass percentages.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 15, 2023, 07:01 PM   #3
PolarFBear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2015
Location: NE Tennessee, a "Free State"
Posts: 477
Thanks UncleNick

Just had a "brain-fart". Spent some time sorting brass and cleaned a few shooters. Back on track now.
PolarFBear is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 02:44 AM   #4
Recycled bullet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2022
Posts: 339
The ratios are to help you decide and use the bullets in a way that results in more consistent results based on it's specific physical properties like hardness, size, ductility, toughness resistance to plastic deformation etc.

If you powder coat the bullets the exact composition of the lead becomes less important. Powder coat is like an polymer jacket that gets baked on and later sized for consistent for into the brass and gun.

Different ratios are like different hammers or different golf clubs, use a specific tool for a specific job or can use a more general tool with some adaptations.
Recycled bullet is offline  
Old February 22, 2023, 09:53 AM   #5
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,060
The powder coat makes it less important as far as barrel fouling goes because the PC provides a form of gas check, expanding into land corners and providing a phase change material shield against hot gases and an elastic shield against particulates. The old poly-wads from the '90s did the same thing. But once you get the bullet out of the muzzle, hardness will still affect expansion. In a high-power rifle load attempting to approach jacketed bullet velocities, hardness prevents slumping under the high g-forces involved (at 40,000 psi, a 180-grain .308 bullet experiences a peak acceleration of almost 116,000 g.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03967 seconds with 10 queries