November 6, 2013, 08:27 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2013
Posts: 128
|
Instructor said this
I took a class as recommended. The instructor said many things of which I have several questions (which I will ask later) but at present time I am asking only about this:
1. Does not recommend CZs' 2. Recommends Smith & Wesson Revolvers over Ruger Revolvers. what should I make of this? |
November 6, 2013, 08:33 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
"CZ" covers a lot of guns from the 1920's to today. I suspect he may have had problems with one model, but I find it hard to believe all would be bad, even if I didn't know they are not.
As to S&W over Ruger in revolvers, that would be my preference, too, because the S&W guns are simply more refined and easier to use. That being said, Ruger's DA revolvers (I assume he was not referring to SA revolvers if he was making a comparison to S&W products), while rugged, strong, and reliable, do not have (IMHO) the smoothness and handling of a good S&W. Jim |
November 6, 2013, 08:35 PM | #3 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Unless (and maybe even if- his reasons and reasoning my not match yours) he can give good reasons to any "why" question you give him, then it's just his unsubstantiated opinion .... and may or may not be worth what you paid for it. Do your own Homework ..... Question with Boldness ..... |
|
November 6, 2013, 08:37 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2013
Posts: 128
|
I don't know James but I went to a store today and Ruger felt good unlike Smith and Wesson which seemed 'malnourished/underfed' for lack of a proper word. But then I am only beginner beginner.
As for CZ I asked him about CZ 75 BD full size gun. He recommends Smith and Wesson MP 9mm over it. Jimbob86 I like this - TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T." |
November 6, 2013, 08:43 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
With that said I would not hesitate to own either. Both Ruger and S&W make quality products. |
|
November 6, 2013, 08:45 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 946
|
Simply the instructor's recommendations, or opinion. I wouldn't put more into it than I would give any other opinion. I agree with the other comments. Do your own research and maybe ask "why" those recommendations were made and keep asking why after the first response.
Personally, I might choose a S&W over a Ruger, all thing being equal, but if I was looking for a new gun at a value price, I might choose Ruger over Smith and Wesson. CZ might not always have the same finish as some weapons, but they also make some that are. Regardless of the finish, there are people who would argue they are very reliable and accurate. Don't give my opinion any more weight though than others. Research and decide for yourself. |
November 6, 2013, 08:48 PM | #7 | |||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
And here we see my principle in action:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
FWIW, I think you both are wrong/misguided/whatever: COLT DA Revolvers have the best triggers, fit and finish, and handling characteristics, and they don't turn the wrong way, either! Sadly, they are not made any more, and repair parts are ...... a problem. |
|||
November 6, 2013, 08:58 PM | #8 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Colt DA triggers stack and so do Rugers (the LCR excepted).
Jim |
November 6, 2013, 09:00 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2013
Posts: 128
|
I looked for first time at you tube videos about guns and there is a 'grandfather looking' nice guy by name of Hickock45 who seems very intelligent and knowing of firearms and he seems to think CZ is a pretty good gun and so are Ruger revolvers.
Now should I take his word over my instructor's words? Edit -What is meaning of 'stacking' James K? |
November 6, 2013, 09:04 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Quote:
When you're in a class and the instructor says something that doesn't seem right to you, ASK! Don't just sit there like a lump, absorbing everything he or she throws at you. Be an active part of the learning process. Listen thoughtfully, ask about anything you don't understand or don't agree with or aren't sure about. Don't be a jerk, but don't take everything on faith either. If it's that guy's opinion you want to understand, you should be asking that guy -- not us. pax A man never tells you anything until you contradict him. – George Bernard Shaw |
|
November 6, 2013, 09:04 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
It is his opinion, yours and mine may differ as well. Keep in mind that just because he is an instructor, that doesn't mean his preference in guns is more valid than yours.
Personally, I prefer Smith & Wesson revolvers over Ruger based on how they feel and shoot. That said, Ruger makes fine reliable guns, I just prefer Smith. Don't buy a gun because someone suggests it, buy the one that you like and fits your hand the best.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
November 6, 2013, 09:09 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
|
charlesc,
My handgun is a CZ 75 BD full size. I love it. Recoil and muzzle flip is very low and it's really just a pleasure to shoot. If I had to, I could fire it more accurately and quickly than any other handgun in the house (we have 5). Might the Smith and Wesson M&P9 be a great gun? Yes, I've never fired one. Might it be the better gun for you? Of course. I did some research and like my CZ. One reason he could have recommended the M&P9 is because it's simpler. It has a long trigger pull and will fire every time you pull the trigger with no safety. The CZ 75 BD also has no safety but has two firing modes -- double action and single action -- as well as a manual decocker which sets it to half cock. Slightly more complicated. I also believe the CZ might be a little bigger, which I like as it's a gun for my house and my car. The bigger gun is more accurate in my opinion but harder to conceal. I also believe the CZ might be a little cheaper but I don't know that offhand. As for "stacking" that means the way the bullets are set. In single stack they lay on top of each other. This means that the magazine (and consequentially, the grip) is thinner. However, you may only get 8-10 rounds. With a double stack magazine, the bullets are staggered next to each other. This makes the magazine and grip necessarily wider but you may get as many as 12-20 rounds per magazine that way. It's all about preference. Don't listen to the above. This refers to magazine stacking, something totally different. I've highlighted it because it's still good general information. Should've read the thread better
__________________
Certified Gunsmith (On Hiatus) Certified Armorer - H&K and Glock Among Others You can find my writings at my website, pottsprecision.com. Last edited by dakota.potts; November 6, 2013 at 09:24 PM. |
November 6, 2013, 09:10 PM | #13 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Quote:
I never noticed ..... but I did notice that the pull on my Colt is smoother than all of the other revolvers I have fired, and lighter than most. |
||
November 6, 2013, 09:10 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2013
Posts: 128
|
The instructor also recommended Springfield XD over glocks. He said he had several Xd and some had 40k-50k rounds and still doing good and they did not need cleaning and he had cleaned them only very few times since they were new.
|
November 6, 2013, 09:15 PM | #15 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, Charlesc,
Stacking is when the trigger pull weight on a DA revolver increases as the trigger comes back and the mainspring and trigger spring compress. Colt developed some tricks, notably in the Python, to minimize the effect but it is still there. S&W uses a second cam with greater leverage that comes into play when the hammer comes back to keep the trigger pull consistent throughout. JIm |
November 6, 2013, 09:21 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2013
Posts: 128
|
Kreyzhorse said Don't buy a gun because someone suggests it, buy the one that you like and fits your hand the best.
____________ The instructor did not give a method to find which gun fits my hand best. He said there isn't any. Said to Just try all I could at the range and that can get really expensive. |
November 6, 2013, 09:24 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
|
Smith and Ruger are equally very good pistols and CZ makes one of the finest pistols there are.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain |
November 6, 2013, 09:25 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 75
|
How would you react if you took a driving class, and the instructor said that they don't recommend Subaru's.
Use some common sense and give these types of statements from anyone with a grain of salt (read: a likely oversimplified bias that makes THEM feel better). For me: people who make statements like these loose credibility points. You ARE on the right track to question the statements, and do your own research. YTube reviews, and A vs B vs C reviews, blogs, and other experienced shooters. Hickock45 is an institution and reliable reviewer. See, you are watching him USE a weapon, and tell you WHAT and WHY he likes or dislikes. You are not watching a video of me sit in front of the camera saying I don't like or recommend CZ's. The difference is obvious.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis SIG P226 MK25 9mm | SIG 239 9mm | Beretta Nano SIG M400 Enhanced Black | Ruger PC9 | Winchester 9422 Last edited by campbed; November 6, 2013 at 09:32 PM. |
November 6, 2013, 09:26 PM | #19 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
November 6, 2013, 10:10 PM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
That's entirely the instructor's personal bias speaking. None of the guns he mentioned are anything but exemplary.
Frankly, it's far from the first time I've heard such drivel from instructors.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
November 6, 2013, 10:14 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
If the "instructor" made such wide generalities about his preferences, I'd be suspicious of anything else he might have said.
|
November 6, 2013, 10:24 PM | #22 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,457
|
Quote:
|
|
November 6, 2013, 10:29 PM | #23 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
Charles,
Your instructor gave preferences, apparently without passing on much of a foundation. There is nothing wrong with those CZ pistols that are based on the CZ75. There have been problems reported with one or two of the newer polymer CZ pistols. I've worked with two CZ 75 compacts, ended up buying the last one despite my resolve to buy no more guns. Recommending a Smith M&P9 over a full-sized CZ 75D is comparing apples to oranges. Two different trigger mechanisms, two different sizes, two different weights, two different safety mechanisms. The Smith would be lighter, more compact, and its trigger would be easier for you to learn. It's a simpler pistol, and that may be the reason behind his recommendation. Define your own anticipated uses. If strictly a range toy, get whichever you like. If concealed carry, the Smith has a size advantage. The instructor's admonition against CZ pistols could be because they have a long double-action trigger pull, and a more complicated (slightly) operation that involves dropping the hammer after firing. The Smith doesn't have that. As far as Smith & Wesson revolvers over Rugers goes, that never fails to open up a metric ton of arguments. I'll state my own opinions, based on having carried both brands in uniform, working professionally with several samples of each over the past few years, currently owning several of both, and discussing both brands with custom gunsmiths: The Smith is more refined. The Smith is not what it used to be. The Ruger is a more modern design, not based on updates of the Smith's century-old basic mechanism. The Ruger was designed from the ground up to handle both higher pressures and a higher volume of sustained use. The Smith will tend to go out of time before the Ruger will (comparing DAs here). Both companies have suffered from quality control issues recently. Both companies have turned out overly-torqued barrels leaving canted sights. The Smith has had internal dimension changes over the past few years that leave it (full-sized models, not the Js) with a stiffer DA trigger and one less tunable. Both brands use MIM parts. The Ruger is a more durable gun. I am aware opposing opinions will follow, but at least I've given you the reasons behind mine. If you don't plan to shoot 40,000 rounds of hot loads through a revolver, the choice will make no difference to you. Pick the one you think you like, and then get a set of grips that'll fit your hand if what comes on it doesn't. Understand that the outa-box feel is not final, you can find numerous aftermarket grips to change how the gun feels in your hand for both brands. The Springfield XDs are a decent pistol, but not superior to a good Glock in my opinion, and they do need to be cleaned. I've carried Glocks in uniform & I've owned two Springfields. I am not a Glock fanboy, but I still own five, and I sold the Springfields. In your situation, I'd pass on an auto till you've got a more solid foundation behind you. I'd suggest strongly that you learn the basics with a simpler revolver. Failing that, the Glock, Smith, and Springfield will all be easier to learn than the CZ, because they're simpler to operate & have shorter & lighter trigger pulls. It's good that you took a class, but when an instructor makes recommendations for or against, ask him why next time. Denis |
November 6, 2013, 10:36 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
charlesc,
Don't take the instructor's comments to mean all that much. Now I LIKE S&W revolvers, especially older ones, but I sure don't say for self-defense they are to be picked over a Ruger. And I don't know what his problem is with CZs. One thing I learned years ago with teaching CHL, one keeps their personal opinions out of the class. Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
November 6, 2013, 10:47 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2008
Location: AL
Posts: 169
|
Deaf Smith said: One thing I learned years ago with teaching CHL, one keeps their personal opinions out of the class.
charlesc, you need to take your training from Deaf. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|