|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 16, 2019, 06:48 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
The BP "volume vs. weight" measurement system has been beat to death over many years over the net. I use both methods depending on exactly what type of firearm i'm shooting. For traditional muzzleload recreational target pistols and rifle I use volume measurements as it's quick, and easy "on site" loading. When I load my 1874 Sharps in 45-70 BPCR I use weight. IMO the weight measurement system is better for precision consistency and data documenting my loads. Volume measuring does bring some small inconsistencies when weighed from what I've observed.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
May 17, 2019, 09:05 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2011
Location: Washington state
Posts: 1,558
|
I will add that muzzleloader accuracy can be similar to modern firearms. Experiment with powder charges to find the most accurate load. I usually start a new rifle with 60 grains and work up in 10 grain increments. When accuracy drops or improves I fine tune it in 2 grain increments. Try Power belt bullets as well. One of my rifles loves them, one is ok, another won't do what I want.
__________________
You can't fix stupid....however ignorance can be cured through education! |
May 17, 2019, 09:13 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2011
Location: Washington state
Posts: 1,558
|
And the 1-28 twist will stabilize 385 grain conical bullets as well. No patch required.
__________________
You can't fix stupid....however ignorance can be cured through education! |
|
|