June 25, 2016, 06:05 PM | #1 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
5.56/.223 for hunting?
Pardon me for butting in here. I'm mostly a handgun shooter and that's the part of the forum where I typically hang out. But in the aftermath of Orlando I'm trying to gather facts and information so I can have it readily available to rebut/refute erroneous and false claims from the anti-gun side. I'm sure most of you have heard it before:
"AR-15's are only made for killing people. They are military weapons." In my state, 5.56x45/.223 is not allowed for hunting deer. The reason, from what I've been told, is that it's not large or powerful enough to ensure quick, humane kills. So if it's not deadly enough to hunt deer, what makes it so deadly when aimed at humans? My question is: What states allow the use of .223 for hunting deer, and what states do NOT allow it? For states where it's not allowed, if you know the reason I'd like that, as well. Thank you. |
June 25, 2016, 06:17 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: April 4, 2016
Posts: 22
|
Texas allows hunting deer with .223 or .556... A properly placed shot will kill anything !..... A friend of mine only hunts with a .223, he neck shoots them.
Last edited by sdrnavy91; June 25, 2016 at 08:59 PM. |
June 25, 2016, 06:20 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 26, 2005
Location: Osborn, Missouri
Posts: 2,697
|
Deer can be hunted in Missouri with 5.56/223, no FMJ ammo though.
Best Regards Bob Hunter |
June 25, 2016, 07:13 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
I've killed deer in Texas with a 223. Not my top choice of Calibers for that, but it will do with the right bullet and good shot placement. My cousin's kid killed a truckload of deer in Louisiana in his younger days with a single shot 223, and I hear he never had to use more than the one shot.
|
June 25, 2016, 08:18 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: Fairport, NY
Posts: 165
|
NNY allows it. The only requirement for rifle is that it must be center fire. There is no caliber minimum.
|
June 25, 2016, 08:39 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2016
Location: NOLA
Posts: 203
|
Many states do allow it, and it is quite effective.
|
June 25, 2016, 09:16 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Yes with a proper bullet and placement it will work .But there are better choices .
For the AR-15 there have been a number of wildcat cartridges developed ranging up to 458 SOCOM which uses a a load equaling a factory load for the 45-70. 300 gr at 1850 .I use that load with my 45-70 and that IS a potent load for deer and larger animals! The non-shooting public , of course , sees the AR-15 as an evil gun .
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
June 25, 2016, 09:48 PM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Gents, I understand I've ventured into the Hunting discussion area, but please meet me halfway and read the question.
I'm trying to build up background information to counter anti-gun arguments. I know you can take deer with a .223. I know you can take deer with .22 WMR and .22 LR. That's not the point. I know that some states do NOT allow .223 for hunting deer. I am trying to determine which states do, and which states do not. This has nothing to do with whether the round is adequate, marginal, or inadequate. I need to know where it's legal, and where it's not. |
June 25, 2016, 11:02 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,245
|
This has been discussed several times, just use the search feature. More states allow the .223 than not, here is a list for you that I've posted before. However, I think Wyoming now allows the .223 for some big game.
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
June 26, 2016, 01:39 AM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Exactly what I was looking for. many thanks.
|
June 26, 2016, 03:43 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: April 17, 2015
Posts: 83
|
Look HERE for an early AR-15 advertisement where it is touted as an inexpensive ($189), lightweight hunting rifle.
I'm sure most guns have been used during war time some place in the world by what you might call "irregular combatants", including the AR-15, but I"m not aware of any military force which has ever used the AR-15 as a weapon. It LOOKS kinda' like a weapon of war, but that does NOT make an assault weapon. You can go to New Orleans or Key West and see men that LOOK kinda' like women and in some cases EXACTLY like beautiful women ........... don't be fooled. |
June 26, 2016, 07:47 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
|
Here is a cut and paste of Wyoming's new regulations for 22 Center Fires.
For deer, antelope, mountain lion, and gray wolf, the major change is the addition of .22 centerfire cartridges as legal ammunition. For the taking of deer, antelope, mountain lions, and gray wolves in areas where they are designated as trophy game, hunters can use any centerfire firearm of at least .22 caliber, using a cartridge at least two inches long and firing a bullet of at least 60 grains. |
June 26, 2016, 09:45 AM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
So that makes it 14 states that do NOT allow .223 for hunting deer, and 36 states that do.
Obviously, my purpose in compiling this statistic is to refute the argument that the AR-15 round is so deadly that normal human beings shouldn't be allowed to possess anything that can shoot it. If it's so unimaginably deadly, why is it that fourteen states think it's too small to hunt animals as light as deer? |
June 26, 2016, 09:49 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: Fairport, NY
Posts: 165
|
The people that claim "it's so deadly" are obviously ignorant of the topic. You'd be better comparing the cartridge to a standard .300 or .30-06.
|
June 26, 2016, 10:49 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
|
Don't even bother to argue with people like that. They have a mindset that will not change. Look at the arguing that goes on in this forum and outdoors magazines. It is a waste of time.
|
June 27, 2016, 09:44 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
Elk and such still fall in the > 23 cal bullets.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
June 29, 2016, 06:41 AM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
I've killed deer with a .223, BUT IT'S NOT A DEER CARTRIDGE.
I'm a realist and will argue my point from now on. What CAN be done may not be ethical or practical. |
June 29, 2016, 07:14 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
I understand the argument you are trying to make, and a picture is worth a thousand words, especially to those who judge guns based on their appearance. Take a picture of the two most popular "assault weapon" cartridges .223 and 7.62x39 next to the two most popular deer cartridges, a 30-06 and 30-30. Then ask your gun ignorant friends to pick out the "high power assault weapons" cartridges. Another interesting picture is the "progression" of our choice of military cartridge starting with 45-70 as it devolves into the current .223. |
|
June 29, 2016, 08:13 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
|
I view it as an excellent varmint cartridge. I would only use it for deer hunting if that is all I have and I personally would not carry an AR in the woods deer hunting (unless that is all I had). That however does not apply to varmint hunting. I just want to go more traditional in rifle design deer hunting. That is me, and not saying that would or should apply to everyone.
My deer rifle recommendations start at .243 win and prefer something near to a 30 caliber for deer. My choice is 270 win. |
June 29, 2016, 09:36 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 111
|
I have killed deer with the .223 (AR15), .243 (Ruger American), .308 (M1A, 742), .308 Marlin Express (Marlin MXLR), .30-06 (1903A3). I've killed wild pigs with the .223, .308 and the .357 mag (Marlin 1894). The ones I killed with the .223 were just as dead as the ones I shot with the other calibers, and it doesn't bother me in the slightest to be seen carrying an AR15 while hunting.
|
June 29, 2016, 11:21 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
Well, gunrunner has a point, in that the deer can be killed with the 223. But I have found, over the decades, that (given equally good shot placement) they typically die a bit faster when shot with larger Calibers. That means they can't make it to their sanctuary area, like huge briar patches. And that is a good thing.
And that is why, when hunting pigs, I went from 100 gr bullets in my 260 to 120 gr bullets. The 120's definitely drop them faster. So...it's gonna take a lot of convincing to make me believe that a 55 gr 223 bullet will work as well. Over the years I have shot a number of deer with my 220 Swift and the 55 gr bullet, but I lost an unacceptable percentage of deer, so I quit using it on deer. Being a reloader, if I just had to shoot deer with my 223, I'd use either the 60 gr Partition, the 65 gr Sierra GK, or the Nosler 64 gr BSB. I wouldn't go hungry but I'd probably be back in the briar patch tracking deer from time to time. |
June 29, 2016, 12:25 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
As this list pointed out, in colorado we need to use calibers .24 and up to chase big game.
My AR is 7.62x39 when I chase deer in dark timber.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
June 29, 2016, 03:27 PM | #23 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
Maybe in some cases there's logic, but in most cases these decisions are made by some mixture of elected and unelected bureaucrats, many of whom have never hunted anything nor even handled a gun of any kind. Some of these laws probably originated before there WAS such a thing as a .223/5.56, maybe before there was ANY .22 centerfire.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
June 29, 2016, 03:34 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Location: Stillwater Oklahoma
Posts: 790
|
You can hunt here in ok with a 223. I prefer something a lot bigger though, it's kind of Handy though for the grandkids
|
June 29, 2016, 07:07 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2014
Posts: 645
|
I would think the more states it is legal to use as a hunting cartridge the harder it would be to ever ban them. Just because you can drive a nail with your $5000 TV doesn't mean it should be done. The problem isn't the cartridge, it's the fact that many of us always try to push the limits. My son has killed a couple of deer with his 223 but his shots are very short. I make his use heavy soft bullets also.
|
|
|