|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 7, 2011, 10:42 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
FOPA...
... As I understand it, would only apply in NJ if one were only transiting NJ. The stop to visit with the OP's parents would take FOPA out of the equation.
|
April 7, 2011, 11:08 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
April 7, 2011, 11:40 AM | #28 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have no doubt that NJ LE would arrest regardless of strict adherence to the FOPA. My point is that, in my scenario, they would be doing it in violation of federal law and that it would be indefensible for them in federal court. Showing malice and flagrant disregard for federal law, they would be subject to money damages, as well as injunctive relief. Quote:
Last edited by maestro pistolero; April 7, 2011 at 01:01 PM. |
||||
April 7, 2011, 01:21 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I would think that FOPA would cover the OP if he were driving directly to Newark and checking his firearms. In that case, an arrest might happen, but should be overturned, etc.
The OP's problem is that he's stated he'll be visiting NJ. If he got busted at Newark, but LE could establish he had been at his parents' house in NJ, the OP would be up the creek, as I understand it. |
April 7, 2011, 01:23 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
"I would think that FOPA would cover the OP if he were driving directly to Newark and checking his firearms. In that case, an arrest might happen, but should be overturned, etc."
He is not allowed to posses the weapon in NJ under NJ law. |
April 7, 2011, 01:29 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Right. And the whole point of the section of the FOPA that covers travel is to federally trump state law in the limited, narrow context of travel directly through restrictive states.
|
April 7, 2011, 01:33 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,254
|
Actually they can even make the argument that driving through NJ to Newark airport to fly out constitutes a destination in the state, and therefore illegal. Long story short do NOT bring your guns here. You run the very real risk of getting a short jail stay, and even if they drop the charges you'll spend YEARS with lawyers to get them returned.
NJ has definite issues where gun rights are concerned. NJ is the reason I won't join the NRA. This state is ripe for a huge lawsuit on constitutional grounds yet the NRA has never tried to get it into the courts. When the NRA decides to fight for my rights in NJ instead maintaining the status quo, I'll join. |
April 7, 2011, 01:34 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
brickeyee....
... see maestro pistolero's post above
I used FOPA multiple times for PCS transfers. Drove through NJ, NY, etc, all perfectly legally. Verified the law with base legal, looked up FOPA, etc, at those times. So long as I did not delay my trip in NJ, NY, etc, I was fine. I made sure to spend my nights in states where firearm possession was legal. However, I'm pretty sure FOPA would provide coverage for a rest stop, without undue delay, if a driver were too fatigued to continue. What FOPA does NOT cover is any sort of extended stay, period. |
April 7, 2011, 01:38 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
|
|
April 7, 2011, 01:39 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I believe they've tried it, maestro.... as I seem to recall reading about such an arrest having been made at either JFK or LGA. (Guy trying to check his firearm with the airline, in the manner required by the Feds, got arrested for having a gun in NYC.) Whether they succeeded or not with the case, I'm sure they made life unhappy for the gun owner for a while.
|
April 7, 2011, 01:41 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,254
|
It wouldn't be hard, and it's been done before. They aren't worried about the legalities. They want to make your life a living hell and they want everyone to hear about it to discourage anyone else from doing it, legal or not.
If you have to fly and take a firearm you are a lot better off flying out of phily. |
April 7, 2011, 01:48 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
At the right time, with the right folks, and with proper legal oversight, a carefully orchestrated event could shine the light of day on their shenanigans in a very public and defensible way. At the end of the road, there would be no more wiggle room without contempt being the result. Once 'carry' is codified as protected outside the home, the basis for such a direct challenge broadens. |
|
April 7, 2011, 01:57 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,254
|
In NJ the only place you can "carry to", and by carry I mean lock it your trunk unloaded, empty mag, is to the firing range unless you are moving. (and they put a guy in jail for 7 years for having his gun just as I described while moving, until Christie got him out)
NJ technically has concealed carry on the books, but the reality is the average person has ZERO chance to attaining it. I know retired police officers who have had to spend a couple of years waiting to get approved for concealed carry. Unless you're a millionaire with a battalion of lawyers or a security guard for the rich and famous you aren't getting one. PERIOD. |
April 7, 2011, 05:08 PM | #39 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
Hve we forgotten the original post, or did we not read it?
Quote:
Since that doesn't apply here, FOPA will not apply anywhere along his inbound route. That's generally not going to be a problem in most places along the route, but he WILL be illegal the moment he crosses into New Jersey. Any talk about Federal law trumping state law (FOPA) is irrelevant, because he doesn't meet the criteria to invoke the protection of the Federal law. |
|
April 7, 2011, 05:17 PM | #40 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
Quote:
He spent several DAYS in jail before he was able to make bail. Ultimately, the prosecutor dropped the charges so the case provides no useful court precedent, and the gentleman's suit against the Transit Authority for false arrest was recently dismissed. He wasn't convicted, but I'd guess the incident definitely ruined his day, weekend, month and year. But this was a VERY different scenario than that proposed by the gentleman who opened this thread. The guy arrested at Newark very much was transiting through New Jersey in "travel" mode. The OP here is coming TO New Jersey specifically for a visit, so NJ is his destination. He is not traveling through on his way to another state where he can legally possess the firearms. |
|
April 7, 2011, 06:18 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 637
|
One of my hunting buddies is a local retired LEO here in New York. Fastest way to one of our whitetail spots is through Jersey. He wont even DRIVE through NJ with a LONG-ARM.
We go the long way during deer season. 0 tolerance round there. |
April 8, 2011, 03:30 AM | #42 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 2,118
|
Quote:
What I said was: The only protection the FOPA gives you in this scenario is if you're flying from a state where you're legal to possess the firearms... The scenario which I referenced was the one you provided which only included flight plans with absolutely zero reference to driving anywhere through NJ. Quote:
You can't put your mitts on your guns while stopped in NJ and still expect to be covered by FOPA. Locked case ot not, your hands are on your guns. The seperate compartment bit is there for a reason, because you're not FOPA-ccovered to have them in your hands in states where you legally can't....
__________________
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." -Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights. Last edited by jgcoastie; April 8, 2011 at 03:41 AM. |
||
April 8, 2011, 06:55 AM | #43 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
Quote:
Many years ago, I flew from and back through Newark on trips to England from Connecticut. On the way out, my destination was a county in the southeast of England. On the way back, my destination was Connecticut. The fact the plan landed at Newark did not mean my trip ended in New Jersey. That would be like saying if I change from I-80 to I-84 at Scranton, my trip ends in Pennsylvania and I begin a new trip when I change highways. Or when I rode a Greyhound from Montana to NYC, the fact I changed buses in Chicago means one trip ended in Chicago and then I began a second trip from Chicago to NYC -- even though I never left the bus terminal and never opened my suitcase. The locked case is not a barrier when its in your car, either, but the law doesn't say the owner can't be able to open the case. The law only stipulates that the case be locked. You can't make it say more than it says. Sadly, when the FOPA was drafted the people who wrote it failed to take into account that people get from Point A to Point B by means other than privately-owned automobiles, and the law simply doesn't make clear that the intent of the law extends beyond travel by car. The law needs to be revised, but that should only be undertaken when there's a Republican president and a Republican Congress. |
|
April 8, 2011, 08:53 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,254
|
Look, we can argue this all day. But the reality is regardless of what any federal law states the NJ police are going to make you wish you hadn't been born. In the END, you may win. But the real question is do you have the time, MONEY, determination, and MONEY to deal with it.
Probably not. |
April 8, 2011, 01:19 PM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
This is a case NOT addressed by FOPA, so NJ will win. Leave from an airport in PA, fly to NJ, have the gun in checked baggage so you never have possession in NJ, and you will fly right through and be covered. Drive into NJ, unload at airport to board plane, and they will (and have) arrested people. |
|
April 8, 2011, 01:48 PM | #46 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
April 8, 2011, 03:54 PM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
You have entered the state, are no longer on your journey (you are making a stop at your parents house that is not required for your trip THROUGH NJ). When you show at the airport to check your gun, they will call the police and you will be arrested. You will then lose in state court 9repeatedly) and try to appeal teh federal court. The federal court may even elect to hear your case. Like the previous case you will then lose and likely be turned down by the SCOTUS. But hey, if you want to repeat the previous case go for it. |
|
April 8, 2011, 05:41 PM | #48 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,434
|
I agree that in THIS case the original poster would be illegal and, if caught and arrested, would lose in court. The law is clear -- without a permission slip from the State of New Jersey he cannot possess the guns in NJ. Since possession is not legal in NJ, the FOPA simply does not apply -- AT ALL, not even while he's passing through Nebraska (although there it won't matter).
However, if by "Like the previous case you will then lose and likely be turned down by the SCOTUS. But hey, if you want to repeat the previous case go for it." you are referring to the gentleman who was arrested at Newark Airport, he did not get convicted. You are leaving out essential facts and creating an incorrect understanding. He WAS arrested. He DID spend several days in jail before being released on bond. However, he was NOT even tried on the charge. The prosecutor dropped the case, so there was NO trial, and NO conviction. Why did the prosecutor drop the case? Pure speculation, but most likely because he knew that IF he got a conviction, it would be overturned on appeal due to the FOPA, and if it got to an appeal court it would be binding precedent for other cases. By dropping it, he left the police in NJ free to arrest other people on the same bogus charge, since there's no case law extant to tell them they're wrong. Where the gentleman was turned down by the SCOTUS was his lawsuit against the NYNJ Port Authority seeking damages for false arrest. That was a civil lawsuit with him as plaintiff, not a criminal case with him as defendant. He lost the suit, he lost again on appeal, and when he appealed that to the SCOTUS they declined to accept the case. Again-- the circumstances were quite different from this case, because he actually WAS in transit through New Jersey. And he was NOT convicted. But what the cops did to him is enough to make people justifiably nervous about relying on the FOPA in New Jersey. Which, I am convinced, is why the prosecutor dropped the charges -- to maintain the FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) factor among the populace. |
April 8, 2011, 05:57 PM | #49 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
Quote:
Aguila Blanca, thanks for helping to clarify things. |
||
April 8, 2011, 08:35 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: June 29, 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 70
|
Do NOT bring a gun to NJ unless you want it confiscated, and yourself arrested. NJ does not recognize the 2nd amendment nor the FOPA act. Remember that an appeals judge made special rules for those travelling in NJ that you have to transfer it to a dealer or the Police and get a NJ permit to get it back. NJ pistol purchase permits are not given to out of state residents. You would not be breaking any law, but you will still spend about a year in prison. DO NOT BRING A GUN INTO NJ unless you want to be arrested, and imprisoned.
Dont like it, but that is the socialist republic of NJ. Not part of the union, and the Constitution doesnt work here.
__________________
Marine, Retired LEO, Firearms Instructor, Life Member NRA Tea Party Member, and general all around trouble maker. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|