June 16, 2017, 08:04 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2017
Posts: 3
|
Colt Automatic 32
I have recently acquired a Colt Automatic 32 caliber rimless smokeless pistol.
I am trying to find some back ground info about it. Patented April 20,1897 Dec 22,1903 Hartford Conn Serial # 705xx It came with 2 magazines 1- has colt stamped on the bottom of it and the other has no markings on it. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks |
June 16, 2017, 08:33 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
|
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 Quote:
|
|
June 16, 2017, 08:57 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2012
Posts: 534
|
Mavracer beat me to it, that website link is one you should bookmark.
Also, check these: http://www.colt.com/Customer-Services/Archive-Services http://www.colt.com/Customer-Service...-Number-Lookup Also, post a picture of your pistol.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
June 16, 2017, 09:26 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
Based on the serial number it sounds like a type 1. Is there a bushing on the end of the slide? What is the condition?
In order for anyone to tell you much pictures will be necessary. Finding a type 1 in good condition would be quite the find because they are usually pretty rough or refinished. |
June 16, 2017, 07:38 PM | #5 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
IIRC, the first magazines were un-marked. C. 1908 when the ,380 was introduced, the caliber was marked. The magazines are not interchangeable, and the early .32's won't even accept the .380 magazine, though that changed in Colt's effort to reduce the differences for faster production.)
Jim |
June 16, 2017, 08:09 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2017
Posts: 3
|
Colt 32 magazines
They are both 32 clips the first one just has "Colt" stamped on the bottom and the second has no markings at all on it.
I'm trying to get a pic uploaded the gun is in good condition. |
June 17, 2017, 01:37 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2012
Posts: 534
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|
June 19, 2017, 08:56 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2010
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 474
|
They are considered junk and the 32 acp is an anemic round. I'll give you $50.00 for it.
|
June 20, 2017, 03:22 AM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,812
|
I'll give you $51!
If you are going to be tongue in cheek, or anything other than intending to be taken seriously, PLEASE use the "Smilies" or a statement (sarcasm intentional), etc. We don't want a flame war about how someone is trying to cheat the OP, now do we??
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
June 20, 2017, 07:15 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
.....I'll go as high as $60, and I'll pay your renewal fee for TFL membership for the next two years.
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
|
June 20, 2017, 09:04 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
These are neat little pistols. Everybody in the Magnum Era wants a .380 but I find blowback .380s to be hard kickers and less fun to shoot than a .32.
I wish I could put a lookout on quiksdraw and his many colleagues to be sure they always get all the rest of their firearms terminology correct. "Magazine" vs "clip" seems to pass as the height of Internet Expertise to many. |
June 20, 2017, 05:45 PM | #12 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2012
Posts: 534
|
Quote:
You may be right, I don't have that much Internet Expertise, whatever that has to do with guns I don't know. But I do know a joke or a "poke" when I see one. Did you miss it? The little smiley face was the clue.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
June 20, 2017, 06:37 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2010
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
|
|
June 20, 2017, 09:25 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
|
June 20, 2017, 09:51 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2014
Posts: 2,444
|
I love mine. They are fabulous shooters. You will have tons of fun.
|
June 21, 2017, 04:32 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 3,101
|
Tremendously reliable and fun.
|
June 24, 2017, 12:46 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2010
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 474
|
On a serious note, I have one and agree with all the positive posts on this thread. They are reliable, well made and a lot of fun to shoot.
|
June 24, 2017, 12:56 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 2,011
|
I love mine
I feel like it's the "prototype" for the 1911. For lack of a better word.
Very accurate, or at least mine is. Good luck with those tiny sights, if you can see em, the pistol will shoot. I made the mistake of putting the original good condition hard rubber grips away and put some Rosewood grips on it. Big mistake, wife paid no attention to the little Colt till I put them purty grips on it. Yup, she claimed it. That's OK cuz it keeps the round count low.
__________________
ricklin Freedom is not free |
June 24, 2017, 05:00 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2005
Location: North central Ohio
Posts: 7,486
|
[QUOTE] In that case, 44AMP should be ashamed of himself for offering such an insulting sum!......
He's very tricky...: (I'm "limited to using 6 images").
__________________
ONLY AN ARMED PEOPLE CAN BE TRULY FREE ; ONLY AN UNARMED PEOPLE CAN EVER BE ENSLAVED ...Aristotle NRA Benefactor Life Member |
June 24, 2017, 05:38 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2014
Posts: 2,444
|
Mine is a pleasure to shoot. It is easy to hold and points well. The recoil is negligible. The sights really are tiny.
|
|
|