|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 23, 2016, 03:27 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2013
Posts: 117
|
Mystery holster for the experts!
Anyone have an idea for what this is?
|
July 23, 2016, 05:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
Some form of size reference would have been extremely helpful. Looks like a revolver holster from the late 19th century.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
July 23, 2016, 06:24 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2013
Posts: 117
|
Sorry about that. My pictures with the scale didn't get attached. Too big I guess. It's about 7 inches long. I'll try them again.
|
July 23, 2016, 08:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2013
Posts: 117
|
Here are the pics with the scale.
|
July 24, 2016, 09:42 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
My guess would be a short barreled double action type of revolver.
But unless someone here has a twin to it, it might be easier to identify at a gun show, especially if you could actually try various guns in it.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
July 24, 2016, 03:09 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2013
Posts: 117
|
It looked like it could be European military to me. WW1 or older. Just couldn't find a match.
|
July 24, 2016, 05:19 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
The size is way to small for any military revolver, you could barely get a 3" J-frame gun into those 7". Military revolvers were BIG, usually with 6" barrels or so, but even a Nagant at 4.5" wouldn't fit that holster.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
July 25, 2016, 10:23 AM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
|
Looks very much to me like the generic "one size fits most, sort of" holsters that were common in the United States in the first half of the 20th century.
I've seen many of these over the years, and have one that came with my Great Grandfather's H&R .32 Double Action breaktop. These things were made, and sold, like M&Ms, and often accompanied one of the guns from the lesser manufacturers, H&R, Iver Johnson, etc., as a package deal.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
July 25, 2016, 10:26 AM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
|
"It looked like it could be European military to me. WW1 or older. Just couldn't find a match."
I'd bet not. Every European military holster I've ever seen has been far better quality. The stitching and general forming on that thing is atrocious. European military holsters also tended to be quite a bit heavier leather.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
July 25, 2016, 08:56 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 925
|
Looking at the pictures, I see extra holes in several places. I believe that this holster was cut down from another holster and stitched back together. That would account for the odd shape and extra holes.
TK |
July 26, 2016, 06:40 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2013
Posts: 117
|
The random holes are one of the things that bothered me about it. The clamshell type top piece seemed somewhat uncommon also. I like the idea that it is a cut down (recycled) of some sort.
|
July 26, 2016, 12:15 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
Looks decidedly home made to me. A commercial maker would have used one piece of leather for the whole thing. If it was an issue holster from anywhere there'd be manufacturer's stamps on it. Or the remains of stamps.
Like this. http://www.ima-usa.com/u-s-wwii-smit...y-holster.html
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
July 26, 2016, 12:54 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
|
"A commercial maker would have used one piece of leather for the whole thing."
Judging by some of the holsters I've seen that were paired with the lesser handguns of yesteryear... no. Scrapping pieces together wasn't out of bounds.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
July 26, 2016, 04:24 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 17, 2015
Location: South Central MO / Africa
Posts: 1,111
|
The flap of the holster almost resembles a Japanese Nambu holster that was refitted for something else.
Could be a flare gun holster. http://www.icollector.com/WWII-Japan...ster_i12219560 Webley holster?
__________________
NRA Life Member Last edited by drobs; July 26, 2016 at 04:32 PM. |
July 28, 2016, 11:50 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
The angle of the belt loop makes it look like the holster is for cross-draw use?
Old military cross-draw holsters are often "left-handed", as the sabre would be drawn with the right hand. The shape looks like it could accommodate a Luger, or Glisenti, or maybe a Baby Nambu? The 7" length might be throwing me off.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
|
|